tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-40469056507388739632024-03-21T06:17:58.950-07:00Hitler the jew and the faked world war IIhexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-35218589565160322332020-09-21T09:10:00.003-07:002020-12-29T06:23:15.115-08:00The second part of the liberation of France in 1944: Operation Lüttich, another sabotage by Hitler<p> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">I talked about the first part of the liberation of France in my article on the landing. I thought that after that, things weren't so interesting anymore. But when I watched a documentary in the summer of 2019, I realized that there were a few elements worthy of interest that showed once again that Hitler was an agent in the service of the elite.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">This documentary was about Operation Lüttich, decided by Hitler and which took place from August 7 to 13, 1944, just one week after the Allies began to break through the front in southern Normandy. Some could think it is only one battle among others, and therefore only of moderate interest. That's what I thought at the beginning of the documentary. But in fact, it was this battle that decided of the rest of the French campaign and was the last major battle at that time.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The situation was as follows. After the landing on June 6, 1944, the Allies advanced for two or three weeks. Then they were stuck in the Normandy bocage and could only advance very slowly for about a month (June-July).</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Then, between 25 and 31 July, they finally managed to make a breakthrough to the south-west of the front, towards <b>Avranches </b>(Operation Cobra). At the beginning of August, they began to spread south, east and north.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jFaNw34yZxE/X2jJAcbBNUI/AAAAAAAAAOo/eoFFz3-IyikXbRDOIPPcaLLG6VVZaE_fwCLcBGAsYHQ/s1971/cobra_operation.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1971" data-original-width="1500" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jFaNw34yZxE/X2jJAcbBNUI/AAAAAAAAAOo/eoFFz3-IyikXbRDOIPPcaLLG6VVZaE_fwCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/cobra_operation.jpg" /></a></div> <br /><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">The situation is then catastrophic for the Germans. Indeed, if they stay on their positions, they are sure to be surrounded and lose more than half of their troops, or even almost all of them. Here is the front line as of July 31:</p><p> </p><p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tXdUzLzu78o/X2jKBaME4nI/AAAAAAAAAO0/OPvMfA9gIDcdYp5mDQPxmB3wAOCdWKuMQCLcBGAsYHQ/s794/Front_august_%2B1st_1944.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="794" data-original-width="768" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tXdUzLzu78o/X2jKBaME4nI/AAAAAAAAAO0/OPvMfA9gIDcdYp5mDQPxmB3wAOCdWKuMQCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/Front_august_%2B1st_1944.jpg" /></a></div><p></p><p> </p><p>What is almost certain to happen is a large encircling movement on the part of the allies (red arrow).</p><p> </p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Odaf5sSzQjE/X2jKNVpoCuI/AAAAAAAAAO8/l8I1ZZzfjbISjYCUwUNrdTB-ryWIYqwowCLcBGAsYHQ/s913/possible_encirclement_of_german_troups_august_1944.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="913" data-original-width="883" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Odaf5sSzQjE/X2jKNVpoCuI/AAAAAAAAAO8/l8I1ZZzfjbISjYCUwUNrdTB-ryWIYqwowCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/possible_encirclement_of_german_troups_august_1944.jpg" /></a></div><br /> <span><a name='more'></a></span><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;"> And the Germans clearly cannot make a counter-attack, for lack of available forces and air control.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The obvious solution for the latter is to retreat behind the Seine (a large French river on the Paris-Le Havre axis) and destroy the bridges. It would then have been very difficult for the allies to pass. It would have delayed their advance. And it's not an invention of mine. Liddell Hart, one of the leading historians of that period wrote in his book "History of the Second World War", page 560 (French edition):</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i>It is obvious that the Germans would have had plenty of time to retreat to the Seine to form a strong defensive line. If Hitler had not been stubborn in his stupid prohibition "of any retreat". It is thanks to his madness that the Allies were able to regain lost opportunities and liberate France in autumn</i>".</p><p style="text-align: justify;">So, it is very likely that the front line on the Seine would not have lasted long, given Allied superiority. But it would have lasted a few more weeks, maybe two or three months. And above all, it would have saved most of the German army and then allowed them to retreat in good order to the Siegfried Line. There, it is not an army in rout that would have faced the allies, but a still relatively solid one, which could have delayed the victory of the allies by several months, even a year.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">But, once again, Hitler makes a foolish decision. Indeed, he orders his generals to counter-attack towards Avranches (Operation Lüttich) to cut the allied forces in two and close the opening created to the south-west of the front. Basically, he wants to do this:</p><p></p><p></p><p><br /></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YqOf4TrKD6w/X2jKlMAbX_I/AAAAAAAAAPI/3pGDlt0II2Iz4PzdHt_VO0b6ZYSxKq4bwCLcBGAsYHQ/s700/operation_luttich_1.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="430" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YqOf4TrKD6w/X2jKlMAbX_I/AAAAAAAAAPI/3pGDlt0II2Iz4PzdHt_VO0b6ZYSxKq4bwCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/operation_luttich_1.jpg" /></a></div><p></p><p style="text-align: center;">Operation Lüttich</p><p style="text-align: justify;">If he succeeded, not only would he close the gap, but he could also make prisoner part of the allied troops remaining south of Avranches (red circle), now separated from the rest of the army (orange circle) and therefore without supplies.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The decision is foolish, simply because the Allies have 550,000 soldiers while the Germans have only 250,000, a ratio of simple to double. They have 3,500 tanks while the Germans have only about 350 for the whole front. So the Allies have a very clear numerical superiority and an overwhelming material superiority. And they have total control of the sky, which makes it practically impossible for the Germans to carry out offensives. They are bound to fail. Moreover, the counter-attack is carried out in the Norman bocage, which according to official history has proved to be very unfavorable to the offensive. Finally, the Wehrmacht has not been able to repel the allies during the previous month (on the contrary, it has gradually lost ground). So, with the low resources gathered by Hitler (about 5 divisions and 300 tanks), there is no reason why it can do so over 30 km in August, while the allies are strengthening every day a little more. It is indeed the distance to be bridged until Avranches to close the breach, since at the time of Operation Lüttich (7 August), the allies are already in Mortain.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">And if it was an offensive whose failure was of little consequence, why not? But the consequence, here is quite simply a risk of annihilation of the German army by encirclement of almost 100%. The Allies will then be able to rush towards Germany without any opposition. So this is a crazy risk-taking.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">But then, instead of retreating his troops as quickly as possible towards the Seine, Hitler decides to counter-attack and brings the bulk of his army to the south-west of the front, i.e. to the bottom of the future fish trap in case of encirclement. And he keeps the rest of his troops on their positions. Moreover, to carry out his offensive, he strips the rest of his divisions of most of their tanks, which greatly increases the risk that the Allies could drive the Germans back at the entrance of the future pocket.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Then comes what was to happen. Because of the control of the air space by the allies and their numerical and material superiority, the offensive is a failure; and the allies, much more mobile, encircle the German forces in what will be called the <b>Falaise pocket</b> (name of a small town located at the entrance of the pocket).</p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3XH1UhITeTk/X2jK5CQYdMI/AAAAAAAAAPQ/6P6LB-BPI0AIfWy-xGChk957AX6REisfQCLcBGAsYHQ/s632/falaise_pocket_1.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="632" data-original-width="604" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3XH1UhITeTk/X2jK5CQYdMI/AAAAAAAAAPQ/6P6LB-BPI0AIfWy-xGChk957AX6REisfQCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/falaise_pocket_1.jpg" /></a></div><p> </p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ckSMA75wRVk/X2jLOqOSwkI/AAAAAAAAAPY/yG_UXRWR-4gIzNG6j3WIzubxyC0158vCACLcBGAsYHQ/s652/falaise_pocket_2.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="652" data-original-width="650" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ckSMA75wRVk/X2jLOqOSwkI/AAAAAAAAAPY/yG_UXRWR-4gIzNG6j3WIzubxyC0158vCACLcBGAsYHQ/s320/falaise_pocket_2.jpg" /></a></div><br /> <p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">As you can see on this plan, the majority of German units are at the bottom of the pocket because of the counter-attack.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">As the pocket begins to form, instead of retreating, Hitler decides to continue the attack, as can be seen <a href="http://www.memorial-montormel.org/luttich_la_contre_offensive_allemande_1_131.html" target="_blank">here</a>:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i>Mortain's failure left the German XLVIIth Armoured Corps spiked into the Allied position. <b>In spite of common sense, Hitler still refused to retreat eastward, ordering his out-of-fuel tanks to hold their positions</b>. The fighting continued over the next few days, but it was clear that the German forces had fallen into a trap - <b>by shifting their centre of gravity to the western end of the front</b>, they left only a curtain of troops to the north and south. Operation Totalise, launched by the Canadians on the road to Falaise, would try to catch them from behind</i>."</p><p style="text-align: justify;">It is only on August 16th, because the allied encirclement maneuver becomes more and more threatening and because the landing of Provence has just begun (the 15th), that Hitler finally decides the general retreat towards the German border. Fortunately for him, the allies took a very long time to close the pocket, which allows him to evacuate a significant number of soldiers.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">As for the number of soldiers who managed to escape, the figures vary greatly. Some speak of 20,000 to 40,000 out of the 250,000 in the pocket. For others, the figure is 200,000. There are also intermediate figures of 100,000 or 150,000. That's the big difference. And it is also not clear how many have managed to reach Germany.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">But what is certain is that the Germans are then routed, since they flee en masse to Germany, having suffered very heavy material losses. From now on, there is no longer any question of re-establishing themselves on the Seine or the Meuse, but only on the Siegfried Line on the German border, which demonstrates the extent of their defeat. The Allies then begin to rush towards the Siegfried Line. Almost all of France is open to them.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Operation Lüttich, decided by Hitler against the advice of his generals, was therefore of capital importance for the second part of the liberation of France. Without it, the Allied campaign could have been much more difficult and longer. Just look at what happened on the Siegfried Line. It took the Allies months to get through, while Germany lacked everything.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Given what we already know about Hitler, it is clear that, here too, this decision was taken voluntarily to make the German army lose more quickly. It was not the umpteenth huge mistake, but the umpteenth sabotage on Hitler's part.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">If this was the only bad decision, quirk, illogicality, impossibility coming from Hitler or linked to Hitler, the idea of a mistake or madness would be credible. But with everything we've already seen on this blog, it couldn't be that. It was obviously sabotage.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">1) What the press and experts say about it</h2><p> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Official history itself acknowledges that the offensive had very little chance of success and that it was decided by Hitler against the advice of his staff, who advocated a retreat of the troops. I put here a few references in case all of a sudden theories that Hitler's idea was quite valid would flourish on the Internet and elsewhere:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">We have the <a href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poche_de_Falaise" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>page about the Falaise pocket:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i><b>Against all military logic</b>, instead of retreating in order to the river cuts after the American breakthrough, Adolf Hitler imagines an offensive on Mortain. <b>By deciding to do so, he is in fact pushing the German army towards destruction</b>. The Führer has personally taken charge of the military operations in the West since the attack of July 20, 1944, because he has lost all confidence in the soldiers of his staffs. He no longer listens to any advice or warnings. <b>It is therefore a complete plan from Hitler's hand </b>that is addressed to Marshal von Kluge. Mortain's counter-attack, launched on 7 August 1944, was a bitter failure for the Germans, leaving part of their forces dangerously advanced</i>."</p><p style="text-align: justify;"> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">We also have the <a href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contre-attaque_de_Mortain" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>page of Mortain's counter-attack (Operation Lüttich):</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i><b>Decided by Hitler against the advice of his general staff who advocated a withdrawal of troops</b>, it follows the breakthrough of Avranches by American troops who managed to penetrate Brittany. The German counter-attack will be a bitter failure and will allow the Allies to encircle part of the Wehrmacht in the Falaise pocket."</i></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><i>"<b>Completely unaware of the real state of the German units</b> (worn out by two months of intensive and continuous fighting and without air support), pursuing his fixed ideas, Hitler ordered energetic action from the commander of Army Group B, Feldmarschal von Kluge, Rommel's replacement. The opportunity is too good, one thinks in Berlin</i>."</p><p style="text-align: justify;"> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">And the English <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_L%C3%BCttich" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>page about Operation Lüttich:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i>As the German commanders on the spot had warned Hitler in vain, <b>there was little chance of the attack succeeding</b>, and the concentration of their armoured reserves at the western end of the front in Normandy soon led to disaster, as they were outflanked to their south and the front to their east collapsed, resulting in many of the German troops in Normandy being trapped in the Falaise Pocket</i>."</p><p style="text-align: justify;"> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">And <a href="https://www.dday-overlord.com/bataille-normandie/operations-allemandes/operation-luttich" target="_blank">here</a>:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i>German officers, warned of an imminent attack, are <b>particularly pessimistic</b> about the chances of success</i>."</p><p style="text-align: justify;"> </p><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://www.battleofnormandytours.com/op-luttich-the-german-counter-attack.html" target="_blank">Here</a>:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i>This Operation, which he code named "Operation Lüttich", was to cut into the side of the 'neck' of the corridor through which American troops were now pouring into central France. Hoping to cut these advancing troops off from their resupply and defeat them, <b>Hitler's General in Normandy protested that launching this attack would cause the complete collapse of the front as the Germans did not have any tanks to spare</b>. The tanks needed would have to be taken from units that were already using them in the front line and with the now constant Allied pressure all along the German front this would only further weaken the German front everywhere and cause more holes to develop. Despite this Hitler refused to change his order and the required tank forces were withdrawn from the Anglo/Canadian front and sent west towards Mortain. As Hitler's Generals had predicted, this withdrawal of German armour from the eastern Normandy side of the front precipitated the start of the rapid Canadian push south to link up with the American forces. This link-up would finally seal the gap between the two Allied Armies and result in the Death and Destruction in the Falaise Pocket of the trapped German Armies there</i>."</p><p style="text-align: justify;"> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">So there you have it, the fact that it was a stupid decision, or at least one that had very little chance of success, is almost unanimously acknowledged.</p><p><br /></p><p> </p><h2 style="text-align: left;">2) One of the reasons for the attack on Hitler on July 20, 1944</h2><p> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">It seems that the explanation for Hitler's stubbornness on Operation Lüttich is partly based on the attack on July 20, only 15 days before.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">This is what we can read on the <a href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contre-attaque_de_Mortain" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>page of Operation Lüttich:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">"<i>Marked by the attack of July 20, 1944, which miraculously spared him, Hitler, against the advice of his generals who recommended retreat, decided alone to impose a counterattack. He no longer had any confidence in the high command of the Wehrmacht</i>."</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Since Hitler and of course all his generals were members or agents of the elite, there could be no attack from them. So this one is obviously a hoax. There was no attack and no one died.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">One of the reasons for this hoax is to participate in the idea that Hitler became increasingly paranoid and unbalanced towards the end of the war, in order to explain all his absurd decisions of that period. But it is quite possible that the date of July 20 was chosen specifically to explain the absurd decision to counterattack towards Avranches.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">It is true that the elite could have justified Hitler's decision without this attack. He seemed crazy enough as it was. But it helped to make it more logical.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The problem was that the explanation generally put forward around 1942 and 1943 of Hitler's psychorigidity and amateurism had to start getting pretty worn out. So the Elite had to find additional reasons for some of his new huge strategic mistakes, just to vary. Paranoia and insanity provided this variation while remaining more or less in the same theme.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><h2 style="text-align: left;">3) The fast arrival at the German border</h2><p> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">History aimed at the general public does not usually talk about the German rout after Falaise. As a result, we don't really know when they arrived at the German border (and therefore their speed of progress). Of course, in specialized books, it is said. So there is information. But in newspapers and books for the general public, it is very rarely the case.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">And even in specialized books, authors often don't usually dwell on the spectacular side of the Allied advance, and thus on the fact that the German army was in complete rout.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Here is a map of the Allied advance.</p><p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EMzyr0fyT98/X2jLuegFmBI/AAAAAAAAAPg/u8i_c4uAvhcFFLX17-bZushBBBDDOAKDwCLcBGAsYHQ/s652/allied_advance_august_and_september_1944.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="348" data-original-width="652" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EMzyr0fyT98/X2jLuegFmBI/AAAAAAAAAPg/u8i_c4uAvhcFFLX17-bZushBBBDDOAKDwCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/allied_advance_august_and_september_1944.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br /><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">We can see that on September 5, only 11 days after the liberation of Paris, the allies were in Brussel, 265 km from Paris. And to the east, they were in Verdun, 220 km from Paris. It is an advance of almost 20 to 25 km per day, which is huge.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">By September 8, 1944, only 15 days after the capture of Paris, the allies were already in northern Belgium. This is approximately the front line at that time.</p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7SnQTL9jtF8/X2jMN1bHM9I/AAAAAAAAAPo/_eNh8IkCfo4glcv0jlr5AgKMFX8VjhWswCLcBGAsYHQ/s1305/map_ww2_september_8_1944_western_front.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="833" data-original-width="1305" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7SnQTL9jtF8/X2jMN1bHM9I/AAAAAAAAAPo/_eNh8IkCfo4glcv0jlr5AgKMFX8VjhWswCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/map_ww2_september_8_1944_western_front.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><p> </p><p>Here is a more accurate one as of September 11, 1944.</p><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3mB1wp-q7f0/X2jMhHGja6I/AAAAAAAAAPw/S-dKLiw6UaEhoq9mXxD3PjSNSMzmWfKLwCLcBGAsYHQ/s1848/map_ww2_september_11_1944_western_front.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1343" data-original-width="1848" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3mB1wp-q7f0/X2jMhHGja6I/AAAAAAAAAPw/S-dKLiw6UaEhoq9mXxD3PjSNSMzmWfKLwCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/map_ww2_september_11_1944_western_front.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><p> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">So, it was a total rout, a stampede. It was more or less the French defeat of May-June 1940 in reverse. The Germans were running for the border at full speed.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">And the Allies knew it. As a result, no longer having anything to fear from the German army, they did not hesitate to advance at maximum speed. With almost no one in front of them, they advanced north and east like a hot knife through butter.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">And so, we can see here that after Falaise, everything was very easy in France (and even in Belgium) for the allies. There was almost no more fighting of any importance in this country, except in Alsace, on the north-east border. Finally, the French campaign ended more or less on August 21, 1944. The rest was a long pursuit of the Wehrmacht until the German border.</p><p>This clearly shows the extent of the German defeat at Falaise, and thus the strategic importance of the sabotage carried out by Hitler.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p>PS (December 29 2020) : the story doesn't end here. Allied generals also made many "mistakes" at Falaise (in fact sabotage). As it is more complicated to prove than with the Hitler's sabotages, the text is way longer. This is why I made it in pdf format. I present it here in french. An english version will follow.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VFjF4CpgrevqJgWkIDIGSpZSOjjLwsjI/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">Le sabotage des généraux alliés à la poche de Falaise</a><br /></p><p><br /></p>hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-49649010220388452782015-03-04T07:27:00.002-08:002015-03-04T07:34:11.528-08:00D-Day was staged too (part 2/2)<br />
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">9) The reason why the German high command didn't react the previous days and during the night of June 5/6</span></h2>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- Verlaine's message the days preceding June 5</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A first element that should have put on alert the German High Command was the message of <b>Verlaine</b>. The first part of it is broadcasted on June 1 at 9pm. Hellmuth Meyer, the intelligence officer of the 15th Army, captures it and understands its meaning. Indeed, a member of the French resistance paid by the Germans explained it to them. Meyer then sends it to Admiral Canaris, head of the German counter intelligence. The 15th Army is immediately put on alert.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Meyer then sends the message to the OKW, the HQ of Rundstedt, and that of Rommel. But even if Jodl sees the message, he doesn't do anything. He orders no warning for the 7th Army. The explanation is that he has assumed that Rundstedt had sent an alert message. Except that the latter had not done so because he thought the HQ of Rommel had. And about Rommel? Well, there is no official reason advanced. In any case, it seems he didn't take the message seriously; which is very strange, since he had said a few days before he thought that the landing would happen in the next 3 weeks.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The nights of 2 and 3 June, the message is transmitted again by the BBC.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
June 4, nothing is done either. So for three long days, we have this extraordinary thing that the 15th army is put on alert, but the seventh is not due to malfunctions in the high command.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On June 5, at 9:15 pm (in European time, 10:15 pm UK time), the second part of the message is transmitted. Meyer immediately warns General von Salmuth, who is at the head of the 15th Army. This one puts the 15th army on maximum alert.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Rundstedt's HQ is informed immediately after. But Blumentritt, the Chief of Staff of Rundstedt does not believe in the veracity of the information. According to him, the allies would not be as stupid as to announce the radio landing. What about Rundstedt himself? We do not know. But in any case, the 7th Army is not put on alert by Rundstedt's HQ.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Near 10 pm, Meyer warns almost everyone (OKW, headquarters of Army Group B, etc ...) with the following message: "<i>Teletype No 2117/26. Urgent. Message of BBC, 21.15, June 5 has been decoded. According to our available records it means "Expect invasion within 48 hours, starting 00.00, June 6</i>".</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One would think that he would also warn the 7th Army and 84th corps. But this action depends on the HQ of Army Group B (Speidel). This said, as this one was better disposed than Blumentritt, there was a hope that via the headquarters of Army Group B, the 7th Army be put on alert. But Speidel doesn't give them the information in question.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And so, during 5 days, the 7th Army wasn't put on alert. And not only that, but neither Rundstedt's headquarters in Saint-Germain en Laye, nor Kriegsmarine in Paris, nor Rommel's headquarters at La Roche-Guyon, nor OKW shows any reaction. It's a little too extraordinary to be true. This kind of thing doesn't happen, unless it's wanted.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And suddenly, the absence of various generals becomes even more suspicious. There is a warning that is given about an imminent landing, and yet, Rommel goes to Germany, the generals of the 7th Army leave to make a war game, and Admiral Krancke goes to Bordeaux? The least they should have done would have been to stay, just in case; especially since it's not as if they were unaware that the landing was going to take place soon.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Moreover, for the first part of the message, ok, there was a malfunction in the transmission of orders; but for the second, no putting the 7th Army on alert comes from the choice of Rundstedt's HQ. However, if he felt the need to put on alert the 15th army it is because he thought that despite the bad weather, a landing was possible. So why put the 15th Army on alert and not the 7th? Well, because it was essential to avoid that the 7th be; because then it could have caused the failure of the landing. So even if it introduced a big inconsistency, Jewish leaders preferred to do like that. They probably thought that anyway, it would suffice to say that the entire German high command didn't believe that the invasion would happen the following days, and that this explanation would go off without a hitch. And also, it would only be a nth detail which wouldn't be noticed and would only be known by a few specialists.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Blumentritt is supposed to have said it was ridiculous that the Allies announce the day of landing by radio. Except that it wasn't absurd at all, since it was necessary to warn the resistance as soon as possible so that they begin to sabotage the railways and the German communications. As if a general with the experience of Blumentritt could ignore it. And indeed, that's what has been going on for several days. Sabotage actions had multiplied in Normandy and Blumentritt was well placed to know it. And also, if the message is encrypted, no matter it is read by the enemy. But Blumentritt was certainly in the conspiracy and voluntarily played the naïve.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- Cancellation of naval and air patrols</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Since moving such a great fleet as the one of the D-day can't go unnoticed, how is it that the Germans were unable to quickly realize that the invasion began, and at least in the beginning, that it would take place in Normandy?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The boats left in the late evening (see <a href="http://www.dday-overlord.com/embarquement_attente.htm" target="_blank">here</a>); so, around 11pm or so and probably earlier for certain ships that were located farer (in Dartmouth for example).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Normally, <b>naval and air patrols</b> should have signaled the presence of this huge fleet. We speak indeed of no less than 7,000 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_landings#Naval_activity" target="_blank">vessels</a>, of which 1,200 warships. In less than an hour, the German high command should have known that the landing had begun, and the boats were heading towards Normandy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But it has not happened. Why? Well, simply because both <b>Kriegsmarine </b>and <b>Luftwaffe </b>patrols were canceled. This, first, because the German High Command considered that the weather conditions were dangerous (there was a storm), and secondly because he believed firmly that the Allies would not land in the next 2 days.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, it probably wasn't that much the storm that was the problem, since at midnight, allied aircraft, including gliders, flied over Normandy. And at the same time, Allied boats left to their landing points. So, ships and German aircraft should have been able to patrol too.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyway, the two main elements of observation, which could have allowed to alert the German headquarters about the invasion <b>from midnight</b> with certainty, had been deactivated for the night.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We can say that it is one hell of a chance for the Allies. It was necessary that the storm be just strong enough to drive the Germans to remove their patrols, but not too much in order to allow the landing to happen. And even then, that day, nothing said to the Allies that the Germans would stop their patrols, both naval and aerial. If the Germans had been advised just 6 hours before that the landing was to take place in Normandy, it could have changed everything. But, what an incredible chance, the Germans canceled their patrols.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Especially that the initial choice of June 5 had been decided long before, on tidal height criteria, Moon which had to be full, etc ... The weather preferably had to be rather beautiful (a little cloudy at worst) and with low wind. But apparently, except if the weather made the landing impossible, it was mainly the criteria of tide and moon which predominated. So there was a huge risk to come a day where there would have been a very beautiful weather and where the German patrols would have been in action; which would have led to a risk just as great that the landing fail. So the stroke of luck to have had a weather just bad enough that German patrols were suspended, but good enough to allow the landing becomes even more extraordinary.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And cancellation of air patrols is very strange; because planes can fly in bad weather. And the weather at this time (during the 10pm-2am period) permitted it, since the Allied planes could well fly (and we talk not only about motorized airplanes, but also about gliders). Nothing would have prohibited the Germans to patrol. So, bad weather could not be evoked to justify the suspension of air patrols.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And in the article of the newspaper "<a href="http://www.lepoint.fr/histoire/en-direct-debarquement-6-juin-1944-sie-kommen-ils-arrivent-06-06-2014-1832903_1615.php" target="_blank">le Point</a>" about the Normandy landing, you find:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"<i>0:34 am. After being warned by a listening station of the Luftwaffe that bombers of the US Air Force engage in missions of "meteorology"(Mercury flights) over the English Channel, Germans night fighters take off, patrol the indicated area... before going home, empty-handed.</i>"</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, there were German aircraft that could patrol that night. And in addition, they were present in the region.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Incidentally, at 02:30 am, the fixed transmitters "Bag Pipe" and "Chatter" from England get into action and <b>scramble the communications of the Kriegsmarine and the Luftwaffe</b> (German Air Force).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So that means that before 2:30 am, the naval and air patrols could communicate with their staff. And the communication disruption is also something that should have highly alerted the German High Command on the fact that it was most likely the D-day.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- Sources of information between midnight and 6 am</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But the boats and ships weren't the only elements which could detect the armada before 6:00 am. <b>Coastal radars and sonars</b> allowed to see it come early. <b>Airdrops</b>, Allied <b>bombings </b>and <b>sabotages </b>carried out by the resistance, also gave strong indications on the fact that it was a landing.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In "<i>The Desert Fox in Normandy: Rommel's Defense of Fortress Europe</i>", it is said that the first clash between paratroopers and German soldiers arrived at <b>0:40am</b>. And at 0:45am, two paratroopers were made prisoners just next to the headquarters of Friedrich-Wilhelm Richter, the commander of the 716th Division. This one has immediately informed the command of the 15th Army (von Salmuth). General <b>Marcks</b>, commander of the 84th corps is informed only around <b>1:45am</b>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At 2:06am: The Colonel Hamann, acting commander of the 709th Division, in turn calls Saint-Lô and reports enemy paratroopers near Sainte-Mere-Eglise. At 2:11am, the 716th tells him that paratroopers have landed east of the Orne, near Caen. <b>It convinces Marcks it's the landing</b>. He calls Pemsel, who is temporarily acting command of the 7th Army, minutes after.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At <a href="http://www.dday-overlord.com/debarquement_minutes.htm" target="_blank">2:29am</a>, the ships of the U Force have arrived off the coast of Utah Beach and drop anchor 11.5 miles from shore (21 km). Another <a href="http://www.dday-overlord.com/armada_alliee_2.htm" target="_blank">site </a>says 15km and 2am.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the book "D-Day: Minute by Minute", By Jonathan Mayo, page 107:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"<i><b>2:40am</b>. At his headquarters in Paris, the man in charge of the army located in France, Marshal von Rundstedt, studies the many reports <b>from Normandy</b>. The headquarters of the Navy say <b>their radar screens are covered with hundreds of beeps</b>; at the beginning, the operators thought their equipment had a problem.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Rundstedt is not impressed. He replies "perhaps a flock of seagulls?</i>"</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Furthermore, he is convinced that the airdrops are a ruse for covering the real invasion which will be at Calais. He doesn't consider the situation as being important enough to disturb Rommel in his home in Germany.</i>"</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So the radars (most probably coastal ones) also detect the presence of the armada in Normandy. This probably around 2:20am or at least 2:30am, since if Rundstedt reviews these reports at 2:40am, it's that the observations were made at least 10 or 20 minutes before.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At 2:51am, the ships of the O Force have arrived off Omaha Beach and drop anchor 11 miles (21 km) from shore.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Just before 3am, Cherbourg naval station tells to general Pemsel that it have detected by radar and sonar maneuvering vessels in the Bay of Seine (between Cherbourg and Le Havre). Since the 0 and U Forces have arrived, one can imagine that it is them who have been identified.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At 3:14am, the commander of the coastal troops is informed that naval units have been detected 11 km off Grandcamp (in front of Omaha Beach).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Around 5:15am, Major Werner Pluskat looks at the sea with binoculars (on the beach located near Eterham, east of Omaha Beach). He sees the vast Allied armada. He immediately calls Major Block at the HQ of the 352nd division to describe what he sees (that said, himself says 3h30 <a href="http://www.ina.fr/video/CAF93012581" target="_blank">here</a>).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So from 2am, things should have begun to be clear to everyone. And at 3am, because of radar and sonar detection, there shouldn't have been any doubt remaining. This means that 3 or 4 hours before the landing, the Germans should have been put immediately in battle order and should have flocked to the beaches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- The explanation for the lack of German reaction: the belief that the landing couldn't be done that night and that if there was one in Normandy, it would be just an decoy</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So how did the Jewish leaders make to explain the absence of German reaction despite the information that clearly showed it was the landing?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Well, again, Jewish leaders have used Operation Fortitude. The explanation for the lack of German reaction is that the high command was sure that the landing would be neither that day nor that place.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So the information came. But the high command has not listened to them, considered them to be false, or said that it was only a diversionary operation and not the real landing. So, the hours between 1am and 6am have been lost, ensuring a little more the success of the Allied operation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is essentially Speidel, Rundstedt and Jodl, who then played the role of decision makers blocked in their a priori.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="text-align: justify;"><ul>
<li><b>The time between 2am and 4am</b></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As we have seen, it's around 2am that Marcks realizes that it is the landing and calls Pemsel. Around 2:15am, the latter then calls his superior, General Speidel, who replaces Rommel at the head of Army Group B during his absence. So, from 2:15am, the German defense should have been put in place. But Speidel doesn't believe that the invasion can be made a day of such bad weather. And also, he thinks that the invasion will be in the Pas-de-Calais. Thus, he tells Pemsel to do nothing and hangs up.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And this situation will be repeated during the following hours.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A few minutes after 2:15am, it's von Salmuth, the head of the 15th Army, who phones Speidel. He said he heard distinctly by the phone machine gun noises when he telephoned General Reichert, who commands the 711th division. But again, Speidel refuses to believe that the invasion has begun.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
To quote again the extract from the book of Jonathan Mayo mentioned above, we therefore observe that at 2:40am, <b>von Rundstedt</b> had received clear and crisp information on the presence of vessels. But he refuses to consider them as true. And anyway, he thinks that the real landing will take place in the north. So he does nothing.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Just after this extract (always at 2:40am), we learn that:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"<i>However, at the headquarters of the 84th Corps, General <b>Marcks </b>has seen enough. He ordered that the Viebig code (which means" invasion ") be sent to all units.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Marcks wants to mobilize the only tank division near enough to be effective, the 21th division. They have already participated in many actions, many men fought with Rommel in North Africa. <b>Marcks contacted Rundstedt in Paris, and even the German High Command in Berlin, but each refused permission</b>. They too are not convinced that this is the real invasion</i>."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So Marcks wants to mobilize the 21th Panzer Division from 2:40am. But Rundstedt and the high command of Berlin refuse.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A little further, on page 112:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"<i><b>3:12am</b>: A signal is sent by General Max Pemsel, Chief of Staff of the 7th army, to his chief Hans <b>Speidel </b>(Chief of Staff of Army Group B) at the headquarters of Rommel, in la Roche-Guyon.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>'<b>Engine noises audible from the sea</b>, on the east coast of the Cotentin. Admiral, Channel coast, <b>reports naval vessels offshore Cherbourg, by radar</b>.'</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>In the same way that he had not been impressed earlier by the excitement of his friend von Schramm about Verlaine's poem, <b>Speidel remains impassive</b></i>."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, at 3:12am, audible motor noises, coming from the sea, are heard. Radars report the presence of ships off Cherbourg. But Speidel again refuses to consider such information.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Page 117, we find: "<i><b>3:40am</b>, the General Hans Speidel orders that the following message be sent to General Pemsel: "Western Army Commander in Chief (Rundstedt so) doesn't consider this as a major operation"</i>."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So Speidel managed to have Rundstedt on the phone. And, a little earlier than 3:40am, this one answered that he didn't consider all this as a major operation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In short, between 2am and 4am, Speidel and Rundstedt play skeptics and refuse to consider that the landing will happen that day, or at least that the operation is something else than a simple diversion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="text-align: justify;"><ul>
<li><b>The time between 4am and 9am</b></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
During the 4am-6am period, Speidel still doesn't believe in the invasion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Rundstedt also continues to not to believe in it, but given the scale at which the airdrops are done, he doubts a little bit. So as a precaution, he orders at 4:30am that the 12th SS Panzer and Panzer Lehr be sent immediately to Caen.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
To save precious time, he orders this before asking OKW the permission to do it. As we have seen, these troops are indeed under the direct command of Hitler. But the OKW didn't approve. And at <b>6:30am</b>, while the first maneuvers of landings have begun, Jodl reports that the two divisions can't be brought before Hitler give the order. But Hitler was asleep and Jodl refused to wake him. So Rundstedt has had to cancel his order and the two divisions have spent the morning waiting.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, at around 4:30am, Rundstedt undertakes to do something. But then, he is blocked by Jodl.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Once again in the book "<i>D-Day: Minute by Minute</i>", By Jonathan Mayo, page 125, we learn that at 5am, the reaction of Speidel had still not changed.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"<i><b>5am</b>. In Rommel's headquarters, La Roche-Guyon, in an anteroom where just hours before they were plotting the downfall of Hitler, <b>Hans Speidel</b>, Chief of Staff of Rommel, is having coffee with Major Wilhelm von Schramm, Admiral Friedrich Ruge who is the naval adviser of Rommel, and Colonel Anton Staubwasser who is an officer of counterespionage. They discuss reports indicating the presence of paratroopers enemies along the coastal region. Speidel is silent and preoccupied, "<b>we must wait and see, and discover the importance of all this before committing more forces</b>"</i>."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, while at 5am, all was now very clear, Speidel was still waiting to see what all this was really about.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At 6:15am, Max Speidel informs Pemsel that there are massive aerial and naval bombardments. At 6:45am, Pemsel reports to Rundstedt's HQ that landings have begun. But he adds that the 7th Army should be able to manage the problem alone. Because of this news, Salmuth, commanding the 15th Army, goes to bed; Speidel also, and most of Rommel's staff at La Roche-Guyon.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Later, between 6:45am and 8:15am, when everything had already begun, neither Rundstedt nor the OKW were convinced that this was the real invasion. Jodl asks Rundstedt "<i>are you sure that it is the invasion?</i>". Rundstedt replies, "<i>according to my reports, it could be a diversionary attack</i>." Inevitably, it doesn't help to convince the OKW that they have to send the panzers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is only with a phone call at 8:15 am, full of details about the vast armada of boats, that the High Command was finally convinced that it was a major operation, and not a small diversion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So we can assume that if Rundstedt has sent panzers, it was because it would have been fishy that no one do anything. With the order of moving the panzers, this problem was solved. But as Rundstedt was in the conspiracy, he had to sabotage this action by the statement that he still believed in a possible diversion. Thus, it was quite easy for Jodl to say that since the highest present general thought it was just a diversion, or at least it could be a diversion, there was no reason to send the tanks.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Jewish leaders could have made that Rundstedt believe in a major landing. He was not completely necessary for the goal of justifying the decision of Jodl. Speidel could be enough to support it. But with Rundstedt in addition, it was better.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Incidentally, the declaration of Pemsel saying that the 7th Army will be able to manage the problem alone shows that he too was part of the conspiracy. Otherwise, he would have made a hue and cry about the arrival of the 12th Panzer, Panzer Lehr and of all other divisions available. In making this statement, he allowed to justify a little more the lack of response from the OKW.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- To sum up</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So basically, when the message of Verlaine to inform the resistance is transmitted, the German high command refuses to believe it because of the idea that the landing can't be done by bad weather.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then, between 23pm and 0:30am, the high command is blind because he removed the naval and air patrols. And in fact, this problem of lack of naval or air patrol persists until 5:15 am; when the invasion can finally be seen with the naked eye from the beaches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Between 0:30am and 2am, the first airdrops begin. But the high command considers that there is not enough evidence this is a major operation. So he waits.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Between 2am and 4am, things are already quite clear. And some are convinced that this is the landing, of whom Marcks and Pemsel. But Speidel and Rundstedt, their superiors, refuse to believe it.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Between 4am and 8am: Rundstedt takes action at 4:30am (sending two panzer divisions), but still doesn't really believe in anything other than a diversion. And neither Speidel nor Jodl believes in a major operation. Thus, Jodl blocks any movement of panzers. So, from there, it's Jodl who blocks everything. And the opinions of Speidel and Rundstedt on the situation are obviously not likely to make him change his mind.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And at 6:45am, Pemsel finishes convincing Speidel, Rundstedt and Jodl to do nothing by saying that anyway, even if the first landings have taken place, the 7th Army will manage that alone without problems.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, in fact, the problem is that it was very difficult to remove land radars and sonars observation and almost impossible to prevent the soldiers at observation posts to become visually aware of the presence of the armada. Not counting the airdrops and bombings. So, another explanation had to be found regarding the lack of reaction from the high command. The cancellation of naval and aerial patrols allowed to buy time until 1 or 2 am. But after, something else had to be found. The belief of German high generals, thanks to Operation Fortitude, that the landing would be done neither that day, nor that place, was the reason used each time to justify this inaction.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The problem is that it was becoming more and more ridiculous and sleazy as the night progressed. Multiple reports clearly showed that this was a major operation. When at 7 am, while the first landings have taken place, Jodl is still reluctant to wake Hitler and send the panzers, it becomes grotesque.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">10) The hunt for paratroopers</span></h2>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Some things could have been done with the 3 or 4 divisions present in the landing zone. But again, it seems that the defeat has been organized (recall from the map shown at the beginning, only the 91th, 352nd and 21th divisions were mobile and could therefore move to reinforce other units, divisions 243, 709, 716 and 711 were not or little).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the area of Utah Beach, for example, the High Command should have made rush part of the 91th to the beaches. But no, it was sent to hunt for paratroopers (near 2:30-3am); and not only it, but also a part of the 709th. As a result, there won't be enough soldiers to fight on Utah Beach to counter the landing.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
They could have used a little of the 243rd. Even if it was not mobile, there probably was the possibility of transporting some of the troops or make them walk. Airdrops areas were only 25-30 km away. But no, this division stays where it is.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So the only mobile unit that is present in the area near Cherbourg, and which could come close to the beaches to counter the landing, the 91st, is busy chasing parachutists instead of going to strengthen the 709th. And the 709th itself is divided (and in addition, it's its mobile part which is sent against the paratroopers, See Defenders of Fortress Europe, Samuel W. Mitcham jr). Inevitably, these troops will be sorely missed during the landing.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the book "Invasion", Benoit Rondeau, we learn, page 120, that on <b>Utah and Omaha</b>, the Germans have committed only 1,000 men. So, on Omaha, the <b>352nd Division</b>, led by General <b>Kraiss</b>, had maybe 600 or 700 men present. <a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omaha_Beach" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>talks of 2,000 men: "<i>The German units defending the Omaha area has a workforce of 2,000 men</i>". The newspaper "<a href="http://www.lepoint.fr/actualites-monde/2007-01-17/j-4-omaha-beach-des-allemands-dans-l-enfer/924/0/29187" target="_blank">Le Point</a>" (May 27, 2004) even talks about 350 soldiers "<i>Over the assault waves, the 350 German soldiers deployed on Omaha Beach end up being overwhelmed by the number of attackers</i>".</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Yet, on the <a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/352e_division_d%27infanterie_%28Allemagne%29" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>page about this division, it is said that there were three German regiments of the 352nd division on site (the 914th, the 916th and 726th. 726th originally belonged to the 716th Division, but the 1st and 3rd battalions had been put under the command of the 352nd division). And, as noted above, a regiment consists of 2,000 to 3,000 soldiers. Therefore, at Omaha, there should have been between 6,000 and 8,000.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But the regiments were not complete. As we have seen, for the 726th regiment, there were only two battalions, that is around 1,300 men. For the 914th, same things. There was only the 1st and the 2nd battalion; so there again, 1,300 men. And the 916th regiment had only one battalion present on the two it possessed; so, around 1000 men. In all, there were only 3,600 men.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And the Allies have landed only on some parts of the beach (it was 30 km long). Therefore, only a part of the 352nd was involved. Most of the two battalions of the 914th Regiment were west of Omaha, a place where there will be little or no fighting. Same thing for the 726th regiment; over 40% is located in the west.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And also, the 916th was established mainly 2 or 3 km inland and therefore didn't face the Allies on Omaha beaches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This map allows to see which German units faced the allies on Omaha Beach:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Q9aF35Xiwbw/VPcQeSIcfdI/AAAAAAAAAG8/SvOTBo6fYnU/s1600/omaha_beach_german_units.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Q9aF35Xiwbw/VPcQeSIcfdI/AAAAAAAAAG8/SvOTBo6fYnU/s1600/omaha_beach_german_units.jpg" height="187" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As we can see, there are 5 companies of the 726th Regiment, and 2 of the 916th, where the Allied divisions attacked. A German company normally had 145 men. So, theoretically, there were <b>1,015 men</b> on this part of the beach (725 of the 726th regiment and 290 of the 916th). One of the maps that I could see also talked about a company of the 914th regiment located west of the landing zone. So, in this case there were <b>1,160 men</b> to prevent the Allies to establish a bridgehead on the beaches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But on the <a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/716e_division_d%27infanterie_%28Allemagne%29" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>page about the 716th Division, we are told: "<i>The division, which was <b>very weak</b> on June 6, 1944, was soon worn out (of approximately <b>4000 men</b>, 860 were killed ...)</i>". And, on the same page, we are told that this division was supposed to have normally about 8,000 men. So, the day of the landing, it was only at 50% of its original strength. This means that of the 725 men of the 726th regiment there were only 360 actually present. So, there wouldn't have been 1,015 men present, but 650; and maybe 795 if we add the potential company of the 914th Regiment.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, we have a figure of approximatively <b>650-800 men</b>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We are told that US troops have been on the verge of reembarking at Omaha. So, with the reinforcement of only 1.000 or 2,000 men on the beaches, things could have evolved completely differently.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What were the other men of the 352nd doing? Well, part of them countered the British in Gold Beach (a third of the 914th Regiment, part of the 916th, and the artillery regiment). But another part, <b>the reserve</b>, also called <b>Meyer group</b> (consisting of the 915th regiment and a battalion: that is normally within 3 or 4,000 men, commanded by General Meyer) was first inland to maneuver to the airborne troops. More precisely, the reserve has left from the vicinity of Bayeux to go to Carentan, located 40 km away (order given at <a href="http://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=2" target="_blank">3:10 am</a>). So, here too, rather than going to the beaches, where the bulk of the invasion was going to come, they focused on the paratroopers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One explanation is however provided. The high command believed that the Allies would land at high tide and the reserve troops would have all the time to return. But they landed at half tide, well before. So, the reserve was not there at the beginning of the landing and there were only between 650 and 800 German soldiers to oppose to 34,000 American soldiers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That said, since the reserve wasn't far from the beaches of Omaha, it had time to come back to them and change the course of the events in Omaha by withdrawing early. And precisely, there was an order saying they had to come back to the east. Indeed, at 5:50 am, Kraiss realizes that the threat of paratroopers isn't real where the division is going, (so, toward Carentan). It was apparently dummies. So, he should have made rush his soldiers to the beaches immediately.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In addition, the Meyer group hadn't had time to go too far. The head of the group was only at the Cerisy forest, located 17 km from the starting point. That is to say that during 2h40, they only made 17 km, that is a speed of 6.3 km/h. Pouncing toward Colleville right now, which was 15 km away, they could arrive in 2h20, and be there at 8:10 am. And perhaps less, because when they started at 3:10 am, time was needed to put the unit in motion. While now, the reserve was already in this state. We will see a little further than the High Command estimated that they could be there in 1h55. So they could arrive at 7:45 am. It could still do it, since the German troops present there managed to resist during a good part of the morning.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But then, inexplicably, General Kraiss lets the reserve do nothing during <b>1h45</b>. Until 7:35am, whereas the news of the landing was given at 6:30 am, the reserve remains stationary.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And at 7:35 am, he <a href="http://omahabeach.vierville.free.fr/302-SituationVueParLesAllemands.html" target="_blank">sends </a>a third of the Meyer group (the battalion I/915) on the center of Omaha Beach, north of Colleville, which is 15 km away. The battalion was supposed to arrive at 9:30 am. This is good, since it's actually where most of the action takes place. But, because of the air and naval attacks, the unit will be very late and will be able to engage the enemy only during the afternoon.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Regarding the rest of the Meyer group (the battalion II/915 and a rifle battalion), it was not until 8:35 am that he finally decides to make it move. So, two-thirds of the troops have remained unmoving for almost 3 hours. And then, instead of sending them to the nearest point where they can be useful, that is around Colleville, at Omaha, he sends them squarely to Gold Beach, around Arromanches, located 20 km from there. Again, these units will be late because of enemy fire, and this time won't arrive until late afternoon.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In short, because of the miscalculations and changes of opinion of Kreiss, the entire Meyer group was useless during the most crucial part of the day.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, as seen before, it was originally very well located to intervene in time at Omaha Beach. Indeed, these troops were near Bayeux, just 12 km from the beaches of Omaha where the bulk of the landing will be. So, going to the beaches from 3am, they had plenty of time to position themselves. And then, it wouldn't have been between 650 and 800 soldiers who would have been present to resist to the landing at 6am, but 4,000 or 5,000. And there, the landing at Omaha, would have had a much greater probability of turning into failure.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And also, the story about hunting for paratroopers located 40 km away is fishy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
First, there was no hope of reaching the paratroopers, beating them and then being able to return in time to Omaha Beach. Especially of beating them, because getting rid of paratroopers could take the day or days. So, there was very little chance of making them much harm before the landing (because if there were paratroopers, it was inevitably that there was a landing). It is true that the Germans thought that the Allies would land at high tide. But it couldn't in any way be an absolute certitude. The Allies could land earlier than expected (and they did, they landed only at half-tide). And even if they didn't, it would have taken too much time to beat them, or even simply to attack them and then to disengage from the fight. After that, Allied aircraft and navy could immobilize the Germans during the return trip. So going to hunt the Allied paratroopers located 40 km away was really ridiculous.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And in the configuration of a landing, paratroopers couldn't be mobile units, but static ones only used to hold strategic points and block the German units. So there was no fear of being attacked from rear on Omaha and Gold Beach. And, given their position, their role was clear. These units were used to prevent the arrival of reinforcements to the landing beaches. And given the very small number of men present at Omaha and Gold, it was unwise to send the Meyer Group in Carentan. It was the only major mobile unit present on site and therefore being able to lend a hand to those located on the beaches. And units on the beaches were so weak it was clear that facing tens of thousands of allied soldiers, they would be massacred. Thus, it was necessary, first, to bring the reserve closer to the beaches from 3am. As at that time, the Germans didn't know where the landing was going to happen, they had to send it around Trévières in order to be in a place to intervene quickly as well to the west or to the center or to the east of Omaha. And once the landing zone identified, around 5 am, it had to rush to the beaches to reinforce the very weak units located in Omaha. So make them go to Carentan was clearly sabotage. It allowed to justify the late arrival of the reserve to the landing beaches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So there was no justification for the fact of making Meyer group wait where it was until 7:35 am.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Moreover, regarding the tactic choice of Kreiss to make wait the rest of the group until 8:30 am, what one might think, is that he has probably thought that he had to keep a part of the reserve waiting to fill gaps if some places began to collapse. And then, when Gold Beach began to be in difficulty, while in Omaha, things were under control, he sent the reserve to Gold Beach. It seems to be a wise solution. But in fact, given the situation, it was not. It was clear that soon, it would be the Apocalypse, because of the firing of Allied ships. So, the movement of German troops would be greatly hampered by the navy. And locations threatening to collapse would have ample time to do so well before the reserve be there. And if that part of the reserve was too late, the allies would have had ample time to strengthen. And then, it was clear that the 2,000 German soldiers would be swept away. It is not with so few men against probably 10 or 20,000 Allied soldiers that they were going to do much. Especially with the reinforcement of allied ships and possibly aircraft. And that's what happened; they were massacred. So instead of waiting, the rest of the reserve rather had to rush as fast as possible to the beaches to stop the landing where Allied troops were still very vulnerable. So the fact of waiting until 8:35 am, that is to say 2h45 in all, here again was sabotage.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And even with the Kreiss strategy, it was necessary to come near the beaches much earlier. The other part of the reserve should have gotten closer to the beaches from the start, in order to be located 5 km from them and to intervene as soon as possible. Given the slow movement of these units (6 km/h), worsen by the bombing, keeping the rest of the reserve 15-20 km away also fell under sabotage.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So they had to go on the beach immediately. Then there was the problem of choosing one or more sides to go. It's not the biggest problem, but we can think about it. Should they send the majority of troops in Omaha, or two-thirds, or otherwise emphasize Gold Beach, as Kreiss did?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In this case, I think they had to focus Omaha, because it cut the Allied front in a more interesting place than Gold. Indeed, the troops located in Utah couldn't easily return to Omaha, because of the mouth of the Vire River and that of Carentan channel. Whereas if Omaha was taken by the Allies but not Gold, troops located in Omaha could attack from rear the German divisions trying to block the allies at Sword and Juno Beach. But anyway, the most crucial problem was mostly to send as soon as possible the reserve on the beaches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Incidentally, the fact of having put mostly troops of the 716th Division on the beaches of Omaha and Gold, which consisted of elderly man, convalescent and foreigners, and the fact that only 50 % of the this division was present during the D-day, most likely falls under conspiracy. Once again, it was staged in order to facilitate as much as possible the landing for the Allies.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Regarding <b>the 21st Panzer</b>, the other mobile unit positioned not too far from the beaches, it too, rather than rushing toward them, hunts down paratroopers. Between 1 and 4:30 am, only part of the division is engaged. At <a href="http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/dday/counterattack.aspx" target="_blank">4:30 am</a>, Speidel sends the whole division fight against airborne troops. But, the English are east of the Orne River, northeast of the city of Caen. So, the Germans are taken away from Sword Beach. It's only at 10:30 am, while the landing has begun 4 hours ago, that General Marcks, who apparently took command, finally decides to send it to the beaches. But, at that time, much of the division is inextricably involved in the fighting against the allied troops. And, it's only at 1pm that Feuchtinger, the commander of the 21th Division, decides to keep on site the elements the most committed in the fighting and make the others go to Sword Beach. In the end, a third remains (about 5,000 men), and two-thirds go to the beaches (10,000).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, it takes time to regroup units. But in addition, as the English seized the bridge between Ranville and Bénouville and it's the only one allowing quick access to Sword Beach, the troops which are sent to the beaches must take a detour and return to Caen, to cross the Orne. Of course, it makes them lose even more time; especially since the French civilians flee and impede traffic on the bridges. In the end, it is not until 4:20 pm that the 21st division will exit Caen and engage Allies near Périer. The English will obviously have had the time to create an important bridgehead and it will be already much too late.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A small breakthrough will be created. The rest of the division has been split into two groups, and the second one (named Rauch) achieves to sneak to the beach without being detected. Indeed, there is a gap between the British and Canadian forces. The Rauch Group therefore joins the 111th Battalion of the 736th Infantry Regiment, in Saint-Aubin-sur-Mer. The action is beautiful. But without reinforcement, it can't be exploited. And the 12th Panzer Division and Panzer Lehr will be put under the command of the 7th Army only around 19 pm. So there will be no reserves to exploit the breakthrough and this one will come to nothing.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, at 4:30 am, Speidel sends the entire 21st Panzer Division to hunt for paratroopers. However, at that time, things are becoming clearer about the landing. So, most of the division should be kept where it is, in order to be able to rush to the beaches. And assuming that at 4:30 am, Speidel has still a slight doubt, he shouldn't have it anymore at 5:20 am, when he is warned that Major Pluskat visually detected the armada. And, at this time, he still has time to cancel his order of sending the whole division toward the paratroopers. Normally, the 21st Division doesn't have already engaged them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In addition, the two areas of allied forces airdrops clearly serve to prevent German divisions in the periphery to come help the units located within these two areas. They therefore indicate where the landing will happen (in the middle of the two areas of course). And the seizure of Bénouville bridge is another indication in this direction. It shows that it is at the north-west of Caen that the landing will take place. Indeed, since the 21st Panzer Division was located east of the city, the aim of taking the bridge could only be to prevent it moving westward. And anyway, at 5:15 am, Allied ships were now visible and German soldiers saw that they weren't to the east of Caen, but to the west. So at least around 5:30 am, the division should have been sent to Sword Beach. The fact that, instead of that, the entire division is sent to combat paratroopers, and that the German HQ orders the withdrawal only at 10:30 am is pure and simple sabotage there again.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Incidentally, the 21th Panzer Division was a unit with a lot of obsolete tanks. It had 85 Panzer IV, almost like other armored divisions. But instead of the 70 regulatory Panthers, it had French tanks taken after the victory of 1940. Again, Jewish leaders made sure to prepare the defeat by putting weak units.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, the 2 mobile units not very far from the beaches, and even a part of the 709th and 352nd division are now wasting precious time to hunt paratroopers, while a part of these troops should be rushing to the beaches to reinforce already present units. Moreover, the reserve of the 352nd division is doing rubbish. All this doesn't depend on luck or error. The German generals deliberately weakened the defense near the beaches for the Allies have almost a boulevard in front of them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Incidentally, regarding Omaha, books speak of near disaster for Americans. But in fact, throughout the day, there were only 10% of losses (which apparently includes the wounded) and only 3% of deaths (including ¼ drowned), that is 3000 soldiers for the losses and just over 1,000 for the deaths; this, for 34,000 landed soldiers. It's difficult to see how it could have been a disaster with losses like that. For a landing, they are more or less normal losses.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But what we can think is that at least one place had to be presented as having been very difficult. Otherwise, the landing would have looked like a walk in the park. On all other beaches, everything went almost without problem. If it had been the case on all, it would have ended up being fishy. So, to avoid that, Jewish leaders presented the operation at Omaha as having been on the verge of failing.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Apparently, the US military wants to remain vague on the exact count of injured and dead. We can think it's because it actually inflated losses. Perhaps there haven't been 3,000, but only 1,000 or 1,500. In the same vein, coincidentally, almost all of the 119 photos taken by the sole photographer present that day in Omaha (the Jew <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Capa" target="_blank">Robert Capa</a>, born Endre Friedmann) have been lost, and the 11 that have been saved are blurred (by the way, only one photographer, that too is cheesy). Here too, it must be so that we don't notice that things happened much easier than what we are officially told.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">11) The justification of the German lack of preparation by the bad weather</span></h2>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All this unpreparedness is justified, we are told, by the mistaken belief of the Germans that the storm would last until June 10 and would prevent the Allies to land.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We are also told that if the Germans were not aware of the change of weather, it is partly because they had lost their weather station in Greenland. Thus, they couldn't predict the weather as well as before.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But then, the consequence of it should have been that knowing they were in ignorance about the upcoming weather, the Germans should have remained mobilized permanently. They would have known they could not afford to rely on the weather to slacken. And they knew that the landing was probably imminent. Indeed, the allies were not going to wait until the Russians have crushed Germany to intervene. And precisely, the thing was looming quickly on the horizon. It began to be a debacle for the German army. And on June 22, the Russian were already at the frontier of Germany. On August 19, they were at almost 500 km of Berlin. Without an immediate response from the Allies, Russia would dominate Europe. So it was almost certain that the Allies would land in 2 or 3 months to prevent that. Besides, Rommel had said a few days before the landing he was almost certain that this one would happen in the next three weeks.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyway, at the time, the weather forecast was of very low quality. So even with better coverage, they should have remained careful all the time; especially in the vicinity of the summer, the most propitious moment for an invasion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And they should have stayed even more mobilized precisely because they had canceled the air and naval patrols. Being blind then, the slackening of ground forces was unthinkable.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So the justification of the German demobilization because of the weather doesn't hold. The reality is that they have voluntarily given the Allies a free hand. They did it because the war was bogus and at that time, the scenario said they had to lose.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We are also told that during the night of June 5 to 6, the German staff didn't consider the presence of airborne troops as evidence of the landing. Again, it's a problem. Since the German estimated that the bad weather would last until June 10, the presence of these soldiers didn't make sense. Why would the Allies have sent troops without any hope of support to be massacred during 4 days, especially since it could put the Germans on the alert? So if there wasn't a planned invasion, it was nonsense. And if there was a planned one, but only for June 10, it didn't make much sense either, since it placed the Germans in highest alert and that during that time, the airborne troops would to be slaughtered. The only explanation was that the landing had started. Then, yes, it could be a diversion for a landing further north. But that was another problem. The German armies should have immediately been put in motion to counter a landing on the Normandy coast (and possibly to the north of course).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">12) A weather and forecasts a little too perfect</span></h2>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Since there was bad weather, how have the Allies been able to make the landing? Indeed it is recognized by virtually all experts in the field that a storm could have made totally fail the landing. Normally, it should have been postponed.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The answer is that the weather has changed overnight. And as the Allies had the advantage of having weather stations in England, and the weather is usually spread from west to east on the French coast, they could predict the weather while the German couldn't. Moreover, it is said that Allied meteorologists were better than the Germans. So the Allies knew that the weather would improve, while the Germans didn't.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is one hell of a luck. It was even the best possible configuration. If the weather had been beautiful, or even just moderately bad, the Germans could have used their aerial and naval surveillance and report much earlier the landing. And if the weather had been really bad, the landing couldn't have taken place. There, they were just in the perfect moment where the weather was bad enough for the Germans don't use their surveillance aircraft and boats, but where it was going to be beautiful enough for the landing can be made. And another stroke of luck, Allies forecasters had indeed predicted the weather correctly despite their limited means.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The problem still, is that meteorology was in a totally primitive state at the time. So it was still very difficult to say reliably that the weather would improve on the French coast. The forecast actually fell under mostly guesswork; which makes this prediction story very fishy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So this story of weather and perfect forecast is a little too good to be true. But Jewish leaders had to invent this story. Without it, either the Germans could patrol and see the landing coming much earlier, or the landing wouldn't have been possible. So either it became very difficult to justify the German unpreparation or there was no landing at all.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">13) The D-Day and illuminati symbols</span></h2>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We know that the Jewish leaders like to put numerological signs everywhere, notably the number 666. They also did it for the D-Day.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The landing started around 6:00 am on the 6th day of the 6th month. And if you quibble about the hour, it started on the 6th day of the 6th month of the 6th year of the war.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Incidentally, it is said that the sun rose at 5:58 am that day. Now, we know that in their rituals, there are many references to the sun. And, 5 + 5 + 8 = 18 = 6 + 6 + 6.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All this implies that the landing was planned for that day. So, the weather, unless apocalyptic, didn't matter. It's even possible that the media lied about the weather there really was between June 1 and 6, to make believe that there was an unexpected postponement of a day, when in fact, it was the date chosen from the start.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That said, it is possible that they had a Plan B. June 18 could have possibly done it. Here, too, there is a figure that gives an equivalent of 666. But it still was less perfect than the 6th hour of the 6th day of the 6th month.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Summary of various inconsistencies and suspicious elements</span></h2>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We will classify this summary according to the shady or illogical nature of the various elements, with the fishiest ones first. Well, the ranking is not necessarily perfect. The importance of a particular point relative to another can be discussed. But it is to give an idea.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1) The landing itself, which necessarily rested on huge strokes of luck to succeed (those in the following list).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Imagine that the Germans have not canceled the air and naval patrols, that the 91st and 21st divisions were used, that the 12th, the 2nd Panzer and Panzer Lehr have been located closer, and that they were sent on time, things could have turned into a defeat for the Allies. So, all this was incredibly risky. The decision to make the landing clearly implies that the Allies knew that the Germans were going to do bullshit.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2) The fact that Hitler chose a clearly losing in-between strategy. He always had strong views. But all of a sudden, he's hesitant, influenced and choosing a compromise.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3) The fact of not having awakened Hitler at such a crucial moment.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
4) Continuing to not send the 15th army when the Allied troops received more and more reinforcement in Normandy. And this, until late July.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
5) The cancellation of air and naval patrols, and at the same time, the absence of many generals.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
6) The fact of not sending a part of the available mobile troops immediately to the beaches; and instead of that, taking these troops and some of those located on the beaches to go hunting paratroopers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
7) All the hesitations from the German generals about the fact that it was not at a landing, and if so, whether or not it was a diversion for an invasion in the north. This whereas the information communicated didn't leave any doubt from at least 3am.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
8) The choice by the Allied command of the day and time of the landing clearly displaying an illuminati type reference.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
9) The fact of not having put in alert the 7th Army during the 5 days following the decoding of the first message announcing the landing (the text of Verlaine).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
10) The too perfect weather and forecasts.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
11) That the Germans did not try to discover what was really behind Operation Fortitude by making low-altitude flights or sending commandos.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
12) Completely lame hierarchical organization of the German army located in France.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
13) The choice of putting the 2nd Panzer Division far away, to a place where it wouldn't be able to intervene quickly during the D-Day, either in Normandy or in the North.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
14) After the D-Day, the fact that Hitler prohibits divisions located near Cherbourg to move back, which makes them lose a lot of men unnecessarily and accelerates the conquest of this very important city strategically speaking, since it was the only one in the region to have a deep water port.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All this can't have happened by coincidence. So, it's quite clear that the D-Day was staged. It's another example of how Hitler and the Jewish leaders did to make Germany lose, and of the fact that the course of World War II was arranged and planned.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS: Why the landing in Normandy and not in the North? Since Jewish leaders could do almost what they wanted, they could have justified a success in the north. It would have made things easier.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Yes, but in Normandy, it allowed to explain that there was a very well defended area (the north) and another not (Normandy). It allowed to justify that much of the troops have remained in the north to wait a second invasion after the first landing. And it allowed to explain a slow arrival of German divisions. So it offered many advantages.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
With an attack in the north, that is, where the Germans were supposed to wait, none of that was justifiable. The army was supposed to wait resolutely the landing. And once this one achieved, it's the whole German army which would have attacked them immediately. There, Hitler could not justify that the troops arrive slowly, saying he expected that the main attack be elsewhere. So the landing would have been extremely unlikely to succeed without accumulating inconsistencies and quirks much more numerous and greater than those we have seen in the present article.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS2: apparently, Hitler maintained a big strength in Norway (500,000 men), to protect the supply of iron, essential for Germany. However, after the invasion of Italy, there was little chance that the Allies open a second front in a minor country (although crucial economically for Germany) and so well defended. Moreover, without an invasion of France, it would have rather given the keys of Europe to Stalin (if Germany had collapsed due to lack of steel). And it was obvious that it wasn't what the Allied leaders wanted. And if there was an invasion of France also scheduled, it led to a dispersion of Allied forces. So it should have been obvious that there was little risk that the allies attack Norway. Thus, Hitler would have been able to repatriate 200 or 250,000 men to put them on the beaches of the Pas-de-Calais and, above all, of Normandy. Or even only 100,000: it would not have changed much the defense of Norway and it would have greatly strengthened the one of Normandy (about 9 divisions more). If he did not, it's once again to be able to make Germany lose the battle of the landing more easily.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-11568501702933190862013-09-14T06:14:00.000-07:002013-09-14T06:21:05.703-07:00The sleazy things regarding the invasion of Italy<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Allies invaded Italy on 3 September 1943.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At first sight, the invasion of Italy seems normal. It seems logical that the Allies wanted to open a second front right away.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But when you study more closely how things happened, you see that, once again, there is something fishy.<br />
<br />
The fishy thing is the fact that just when the Allies were on the verge of invading Italy, Mussolini was thrown out of the power.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And what is fishier is how things happened. On 24 July 1943, The Grand Council of Fascism met. It was the first time that this body had met since the start of the war. One of the resolutions on the agenda asked the king to resume his full constitutional powers; to the detriment of Mussolini of course. This motion carried by a 19-7 margin. The next day, Mussolini was arrested by Carabinieri on king's orders.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The problem is that such things can't happen. It's just ridiculous. Mussolini would have seen the motion proposal on the agenda of the meeting. And faithful subordinates would have warned him about it. Then, Mussolini would have immediately put in jail or more probably killed the guys who had proposed the meeting.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Even if he had let the Council meet, he would have sent the conspirators to prison during the Council, or just after (or killed them).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Even the demand of a Grand Council of Fascism meeting, at this very moment would have obviously seemed extremely suspicious for Mussolini, or for anybody with an IQ above 20. You are losing the war, the national territory is now under attack, and someone wants suddenly to meet the Grand Council, a council whish hasn't met since the beginning of the war? You would of course think: "Hey guys, aren't you trying to oust me from power? Do you really think I'm gonna let you do this"?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Those guys would in fact never have dared to meet the council. They would have been sure that Mussolini would have made them killed for treason right away.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And they would have known that Hitler would send his troops in Italy and would destroy their work after just one week, making all those efforts and risks totally worthless. And the German troops being already present in Italy, the conspirators would have known they had a high risk of being taken by them and being executed.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<a name='more'></a>There would have also been a great risk that most Italian generals would have remained faithful to Mussolini and would have arrested the conspirators immediately. They would have known this and wouldn't have dared to take such a risk. As the plan was only between the King and some politicians, and thus as the army was almost not involved, most generals would have regarded this as a coup and would have stayed faithful to Mussolini.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is said in Wikipedia that Mussolini was informed by people devoted to him, agents of the OVRA and the Germans that plots were going on. Thus, he was certainly informed about what was being prepared and he would have crushed right away the conspiracy against him. So, you can't even invoke the surprise from Mussolini.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
To explain the very fishy behavior of Mussolini, Jewish leaders have propagated the idea that he was depressed because Italy was losing the war; and thus was very apathetic. But this explanation sounds very lousy and phony. When you keep the power during 20 years, you don't let it go so easily. You are used to fight for it. And you don't let it go especially when you know that otherwise you will much probably be judged and executed very soon (your enemy can promise you safety, you know you can't trust them). He knew the war was a fight to the death, not only for Italy, but also for him. And he wasn't of the suicidal kind.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
So, it's clear that the fall of Mussolini was staged by Jewish leaders. They ordered him to leave the power. He would have never left it so easily without an order from them. And the conspirators were of course jews too (and thus knew they didn't take any risk in doing this).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The question is why Jewish leaders wanted him to do that?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My opinion is that they did that because of D-day (Normandy landing of June 1944).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Their first problem was that even if they controlled each side, they didn't control every level of the German army. And the second problem is the success of a landing is something very hazardous during the first days. So, if there had been, let's say, just 200.000 more Axis soldiers in Normandy, with some uncontrolled Colonels and low-rank generals resisting too well, a failure would have been possible. So, we can think that in order to be sure to avoid a failure of the D-day, they tried to get as few Axis soldiers as possible in Normandy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The problem here is you can think that, anyway, Germans only had already very few reserves in 1943, and thus could send very few soldiers in Normandy in order to wait for a possible landing. Same thing with Mussolini. You can think he didn't have many troops left to be sent in Normandy. So, there was no special need to invade Italy in order to force Germany and Italy to have troops locked there.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But when you know certain figures, things become very different. Hitler was able to send 600.000 German soldiers in Italy in order to fight against Allies. And Italy had not less than 4 million soldiers. So, without the invasion of Italy, we can think that at least 150.000 German soldiers could have been sent in Normandy and 200.000 Italians, that is 350.000. Of course, Jewish leaders could have avoided sending those troops in Normandy. But it would have seemed strange.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And with the Luftwaffe much less exhausted without the Italian war, Allied forces wouldn't have got total air superiority. The German war machine would also have been in a better shape, since it would have been less bombed in some areas.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then Allies could have failed during the D-day. It could have been a success, but there would have been a non-negligible risk of failure.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Such a risk was inacceptable for Jewish leaders. This is why they staged the fall of Mussolini, and after that, the invasion of Italy (before all this, the invasion of Sicily was of course required to justify the fall of Mussolini).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The fall of Mussolini was crucial, because without it, Italy was still a fascist state enemy of Allied countries. Thus, there were still the 4 million soldiers ready to fight for Italy. Even if Jewish leaders had sold the idea that Italian soldiers were of low quality, and even cowards, it would have been quite difficult to make Italy be invaded so easily without the thing seeming fishy (especially with Germans helping them). And, here too, the success of the landing would have been hazardous. But with Italy's new government being a friend of Allies, the landing was not a problem anymore, since the troops were ordered not to fight. And the 4 million soldiers weren't a threat anymore either.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is why Jewish leaders ordered Sicily to be taken. It allowed them to justify the fall of Mussolini. And the fall of Mussolini allowed: 1) Allied troops to land on Italy almost without any risk; 2) to make disappear the problem of the 4 million Italian soldiers; 3) Then with the invasion of Italy and the disappearance of the 4 million Italian soldiers' threat, they could force Hitler to send 600.000 German soldiers in Italy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One month after the staged replacement of Mussolini (24 July 1943), the new Italian government concluded an armistice with the Allies (3 September 1943). The Allied troops landed on Italy the same day at Reggio Calabria (Operation Baytown). It is said that, as the armistice was made public only on 9 September 1943, the landing at Reggio Calabria was not impacted by it. But, we can think that Italian troops were secretly ordered to fight as little as possible. There were few German troops there, but they were ordered to retreat, because the German Headquarters thought the main attack would happen at Salerno. After that, Allies landed at Taranto on 9 September 1943 (Operation Slapstick). Because of the armistice, there was virtually no opposition. Within 48 hours of landing at Taranto, the airborne division reached and occupied the port of Brindisi and Bari (80 km north-east of Taranto) on the Adriatic coast without opposition from the Italian or German defenders. The 8th army, which had landed at Reggio Calabria, was able to march 300 miles north to the Salerno area with no opposition other than engineer obstacles. So, as planned by Jewish leaders, the fall of Mussolini made the landing in Italy, and after that the march toward the north, very easy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dJnm6565pHk/UjRgaYeFP0I/AAAAAAAAAEo/DsNRrp7HBFw/s1600/Invasion_of_italy_1943.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dJnm6565pHk/UjRgaYeFP0I/AAAAAAAAAEo/DsNRrp7HBFw/s320/Invasion_of_italy_1943.jpg" width="266" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-tkHKN0fjXkE/UjRgfjSx8xI/AAAAAAAAAEw/1n96V5v3vgE/s1600/Italy_Defense_Lines_South_of_Rome_1943_4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="218" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-tkHKN0fjXkE/UjRgfjSx8xI/AAAAAAAAAEw/1n96V5v3vgE/s320/Italy_Defense_Lines_South_of_Rome_1943_4.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then, Germany was forced to send 600.000 soldiers in Italy. The former 4 million soldiers army of Italy had almost ceased to exist (after the rescue of Mussolini by Germans, only 100.000 Italian soldiers were found to fight with Germans). The Luftwaffe was completely exhausted by this new effort. Thus, Germans weren't able to send any more troops in France; and they couldn't ask Mussolini to send Italian troops in Normandy either. So, there was no risk anymore that the D-day could fail.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Another sleazy thing is timing of the coup d'état. Normally, you would have expected it to be made after the end of the Sicily's invasion, for example on 25 August 1943. Then, the armistice with the Allies could have been concluded almost right away; Germans wouldn't have got enough time to send reinforcements, and the Allies could have invaded the entire Italy easily. But no, the coup was made at least one month before the moment Allies could invade Italy (they were busy invading Sicily). This let Germans plenty of time to send a lot of troops and to be able to prevent Allies to conquer the entire Italian territory.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course the men behind the coup couldn't ignore things would happen this way and that it would lead to a long battle on the Italian territory. So, they voluntarily made their coup at the wrong moment.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, we can think that things happened this way because it was planned by Jewish leaders. They probably didn't want to let the Allies conquer the entire Italy as soon as 1943, because then, their agenda would have been quite disturbed. Germany could have been almost paralyzed by the bombings. And the Allies could possibly have crushed the German armies in the North of Italy, or could have been able to land on the coasts of Croatia or of France. Then, the Allies could have invaded Germany long before 1945. They could have made it in 1944, when Russians were still in Poland. And as Jewish leaders had already planned that USSR would control a half of Europe, they didn't wanted Allies to control All Germany and maybe a part of Balkans. Of course, Jewish leaders could have arranged things in order to prevent this from happening. But it would have introduced more fishy events.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, to avoid this, Jewish leaders had to make the coup d'état happen one or two months before the invasion of Italy by the Allies, in order to give Hitler enough time to send troops.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The problem is that it introduces an inconsistency. Normally, conspirators wouldn't have chosen this moment to make their coup. They would have made it later, when they were sure that Allies could invade Italy right away. So, the timing of the coup d'état is very sleazy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The timing was fishy for another reason: the coup was organized in a very short time. The conspiracy began on 4 June 1943, when the king Victor Emmanuel III suggested Dino Grandi that a vote at the Grand Council of Fascism could permit him to depose Mussolini. So, it took only one month and twenty days to carry out the coup d'état: too quick to be true. Usually, such things are prepared during at least 6 months, time to convince important people to follow the first conspirators. Because, when you are a conspirator leaving in a dictatorship, you are very cautious. Any guy you reveal your intention to could denounce you and make you arrested and killed. But as all this was staged, the conspirators knew they didn't risk anything (most of the guys who were supposedly killed in fact weren't) and that everything would go fine.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But in fact, we can consider that the plot was carried out in a shorter time than that. Neither Victor Emmanuel III nor Grandi could know that the Allies would invade Sicily on 10 July 1943. And they couldn't know either that Sicily would fall so quickly. So, the 4 June 1943, the plot could only be something still vague. Things were accelerated only when Sicily was invaded. But then, it means that the coup was organized in only 14 days. Not credible. Even, if we accept to think that things were already more precise at the beginning of July, it still makes only 24 days and it is still incredible.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, Jewish leaders could have made the landing on Italy happen only in October or November. Then, the coup d'état could have been carried out later and his timing would have been less sleazy. But then, it would have been strange that Hitler wouldn't have already sent troops in Italy. As Hitler had seen how Italian troops had collapsed so easily in Sicily, he couldn't have waited the invasion of Italy without doing something. And with a lot of German troops already in Italy, the coup could never have been made;</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS2:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, at the end of the war, Mussolini wasn't killed, as official history would like us to believe. They most probably took someone who looked like him. And as it wasn't enough, they disfigured him in order to make him unrecognizable by people. As Mussolini was a jew (like Hitler or Franco), Jewish leaders wouldn't have killed him. Otherwise, high rank jews like him wouldn't want anymore to serve Jewish leaders. So, they faked his death, and sent him somewhere else (as they did with Hitler). This is something Jewish leaders have also made nowadays with the jews Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS3:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We can also think that the weak resistance in Sicily was staged. Maybe Mussolini didn't put enough troops there, or didn't give clear orders of resisting as much as possible. It is said that he was very apathetic during the invasion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS4:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
You could think that the invasion of Italy had also the purpose of decreasing the pressure on Russian armies. But Jewish leaders could make Hitler take wrong decisions leading to massive losses of troops. So, I don't think the Russian front was the main goal of Italy's invasion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-78811682287703839722013-09-12T04:22:00.000-07:002013-09-12T04:34:13.603-07:00Hitler's strategic mistakes between 1941 and 1942 in Russia were made on purpose<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
As we have already seen it, Hitler was just a lieutenant of Jewish leaders (as Roosevelt, Stalin, Churchill, Blum, Mussolini, Franco, etc…). His main role was to allow the creation of Israel and to push ordinary jews to emigrate there. Once his work accomplished, he wouldn't be needed anymore. So, his role as Nazi leader was meant to last only a limited period of time. It means he had to succeed at the beginning, and then to start losing. As all the sides were under control, the entire war was staged (by Jewish leaders).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Regarding the Russian campaign, Hitler's army was supposed to be vastly superior and to have great successes at the beginning, and very soon after, to stop winning. As the result couldn't be left to chance, Hitler the Jewish agent (and his generals) had to make voluntary mistakes in order to lose at the end. Same thing for Stalin.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Let's see the official history.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<br /></div>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Before Operation Barbarossa</b></h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Even before the Russian campaign, Hitler has made errors.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He doesn't mobilize all Germany. This will lead to a lack of soldiers during Barbarossa and after. It will also lead to a lack of equipment.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
German tanks have a very complicated design; thus, they are produced extremely slowly. Whereas Russian tanks are much more standardized and can be produced en masse.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Even if German soldiers were trained in Russia during the rearmament period, it seems that German generals don't know the rasputitsa (moment of the year when the ground becomes very muddy). Therefore, their tanks aren't adapted to it.<b> </b><br />
<br />
<br />
<h3>
<b>1941: operation Barbarossa</b></h3>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyway, Hitler invades Russia in June 22 1941. Stalin is totally surprised by the invasion, thus the Russian army is unprepared. Because of that, the disorganization is complete. The German army is also largely superior to the Russian one (better organization, more mobile, better officers, etc…). It allows Germans forces to win easily at first, using blitzkrieg strategy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There are three German army groups (north, center, and south).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Army Group Center is the most powerful. It's the one which makes most of the prisoners. By using blitzkrieg, they encircle Russians at Bialystok and Minsk between 22nd June and 3rd July and make at first 420.000 soldiers. 1.500 canons, 2.500 tanks and 1.669 airplanes are also captured. But, the encirclement is not perfect and many soldiers are able to escape, thus, only <b>290.000</b> are taken at the end.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
For Army Group North, the strategy was different. They weren't supposed to encircle Russian troops, but to make a breakthrough with the panzers and make them advance as quickly as possible toward Leningrad.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Army Group South beats Russian at Brody, between June 23-29. The 9th July, they are at 75 km of Kiev and 40 km after Ternopil.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SFOwucSekRU/UjGi1gn5S7I/AAAAAAAAAEQ/-WMwi7iblUg/s1600/Eastern_Front_1941-06_to_1941-12.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="245" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SFOwucSekRU/UjGi1gn5S7I/AAAAAAAAAEQ/-WMwi7iblUg/s320/Eastern_Front_1941-06_to_1941-12.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As Germany shouldn't win, first mistakes and fatalities had to happen after the first success. Otherwise, Germans would have won very quickly.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<a name='more'></a>Army Group Center progresses very fast. The 10th July, they are at Smolensk. The 16th July, Smolensk falls. Germans have already advanced 650 km. It's an incredible success.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The first mistakes come with <b>Army Group North</b>. The panzers progress very fast too. In only 4 days they have made 300 km and are on the Dvina River (the 26th June). But suddenly, there are ordered <b>to stop during 6 days</b>; this because Leeb (who command the army group) thinks their flank is exposed. It destroys totally the momentum of the attack. Besides that, a part of the infantry of army group north is sent to the east in order to participate to attack Russians at Polotsk (the 14th July). It also participates to lose momentum of army group north. But, starting again, the 4th July, panzers are at Ostrov, which is 220 km farer than the Dvina River. And the 14, they are on the Louga River. Leningrad is now only 120 km ahead. But, <b>once again they are stopped during 6 days</b>, this time in order to resupply. Once again, the momentum of the attack is destroyed.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Army group south encircles Russians at <b>Uman </b>between the 15th July and the 8th August. There are 200.000 Russians killed and 100.000 who are made prisoners.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
After the 16th July, Army group center should continue to advance. Even if Russians have succeeded in reconstituting a front, Germans are now very superior. However, nothing happens. Why? Because the 19th July (some say the 23), Hitler has ordered almost all panzers of army group center to be sent to south-east, toward Kiev (directive 33) and to north-west. Then, deprived from vital troops, Germans are blocked on Smolensk. Until the end of September, that is during two months and ten days, front center won't move.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Some don't consider this as a mistake because the success at Kiev allowed Germans to destroy an indeed dangerous salient and to have 615.000 Russians killed or prisoners.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, many people think it's a mistake because Moscow was a big transport center (railroads, roads), apart from the fact that it was an administrative center and the capital of Russia. Everything coming from south to north-west passed by Moscow. So if Moscow had been taken, all soviet armies at the north would have been destroyed easily, because of the lack of supply. And all German armies from north-west would then have been available to fight with army group center. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Because of this dispersion of the German forces, the assault on Moscow is delayed of 2 months and 10 days. When Germans attack Moscow at the end of September, it's too late. The winter is there very quickly; and Russians have been able to reinforce and to make defense lines. Germans can't take Moscow. And after December, Russian reinforcements from Siberia enable them to make Germans retreat.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On the north front, reinforcement from army group center wasn't enough to enable Germans to take Leningrad.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
During 1941 and the beginning of 1942, Germans have lost almost 800.000 soldiers. In 1942, they can't continue to attack everywhere as they have done during 1941. They can attack only on one part of the front.<b> </b><br />
<br />
<br />
<h3>
<b>1942: operation "case blue"</b></h3>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hitler decides to attack at the south of the front, in order to take oil from Caucasus. At first sight, the goal is not stupid, since without oil from Caucasus, Russians won't be able to continue the war. But once again, there will be multiple mistakes which will prevent Germans to obtain a success.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In order to reach this goal, army group south is separated into two groups: army group A (Caucasus campaign) and army group B (Volga campaign). Army group B will reach Stalingrad in order to cut the road of Caucasus to the Russian forces. During a hypothetic second phase of the plan, Germans are supposed to go to the north toward Kazan. Army group A will go to the Caucasus in order to take control of oil wells and refineries.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Army Group A, under Wilhelm List (Caucasus campaign)</div>
<ul>
<li>First Panzer Army</li>
<li>Seventeenth Army</li>
<li>Third Romanian Army</li>
<li>Eleventh Army</li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Army Group B, under Maximilian von Weichs (Volga campaign)</div>
<ul>
<li>Second Army</li>
<li>Fourth Panzer Army</li>
<li>Sixth Army</li>
<li>Second Hungarian Army</li>
<li>Fourth Romanian Army</li>
<li>Eighth Italian Army</li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Having two army groups is already quite dangerous, since Germans are greatly diluting their force.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The campaign begins the 28th June 1942, so, lately once again.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But in fact, one month before this, the second battle of Kharkov (May 12-28) led to the surrounding of 270.000 Russian soldiers. It gave Germans the opportunity to progress during some months on the southern front without encountering too much opposition.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The second thing which made that Germans had little opposition during some times is that when they launched their offensive on the southern front, Stalin thought their final objective was Moscow. He thought they would turn north toward Moscow after Voronezh. Thus, he decided to reinforce front center near Voronezh rather than the southern one.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Here is the map:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vh0RIys0Qxg/UjGjLEAzx3I/AAAAAAAAAEY/mv_34wEOE_4/s1600/Eastern_Front_1942-05_to_1942-11.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="245" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vh0RIys0Qxg/UjGjLEAzx3I/AAAAAAAAAEY/mv_34wEOE_4/s320/Eastern_Front_1942-05_to_1942-11.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At the beginning of the campaign, everywhere Russians retreat. The 5th July, Group B is at Voronej. But, as the Fourth Panzer Army is involved in the battle for this town, Germans lose time and aren't able to encircle Russians. These are able to flee. Russians have learned from last year, and retreat instead of fighting. Then, because Germans find only scattered troops, Hitler think it's the debacle for Russians and that victory is near.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Regarding Army Group A, they are able to take Rostov the 23rd July, but once again, are unable to encircle the Russian forces.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Army Group B is progressing very quickly toward Stalingrad. The 22nd July, they are at 60 km north-west of Stalingrad, on the Don River.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, they don't attack; because Fourth Panzer Army has been sent to the south to help Army Group A to cross the Don River (the river makes a bend, so it's the same river near Stalingrad and in Rostov). As the Sixth Army was advancing very fast, Hitler thought it could go to Stalingrad alone. But now, they find important resistance from Soviet troops on the left side of the Don and are conscious the Sixth Army can't beat the Russian forces alone especially at Stalingrad.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Fourth Panzer Army takes Kotelnikovo the 2nd August. Then, they are sent to the north to join the Sixth Army in order to help it crossing the Don and taking Stalingrad. But before that, Fourth Panzer Army is split into two: one part trying to go to the Caspian Sea, the other part joining the Sixth Army.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Sixth Army crosses the Don only the 23rd August. The 24th August, they are on the suburb of Stalingrad.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The 29th August, the Sixth Army could encircle Russians. But once again, a counter-attack prevents them from doing this.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Having made its junction with the Fourth Panzer Army (September 2), the Sixth Army enter Stalingrad the 12th September.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A frontal battle begins. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_Blue" target="_blank">Wikipedia </a>says: "<i>To deal with the complete air superiority of the Luftwaffe, the commander of the 62nd Army, General Vasily Chuikov, ordered his troops to engage the Germans in close quarters fighting ('hugging' the enemy), rendering the German superiority in combined arms tactics almost useless. The Luftwaffe nevertheless played a crucial role, as it suppressed Soviet artillery on the eastern bank of the Volga and caused heavy casualties to the Soviet attempts to reinforce the defenders over the river</i>."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The battle lasts from mid-September to mid-November. Germans capture 90 % of the town.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At the beginning of November, anticipating victory, Hitler decides to withdraw a substantial number of aircrafts to the Mediterranean.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The 19th November, Russians launch "<b>operation Uranus</b>" which leads to the encirclement of the Sixth Army and parts of the Fourth Panzer Army which are in Stalingrad. Flanks are mainly guarded by Romanian, Hungarian, and Italian soldiers, who are exhausted and poorly equipped.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then, instead of ordering the Sixth Army to break out, Hitler orders it to remain on the defensive.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
They are supposed to be resupplied by air. But of course such a task is far over the capabilities of the Luftwaffe. Thus, the ability of the Sixth Army to resist decreases more and more, and Russians are able to take back the northern part of the city.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
To break the encirclement, Army Group Don is created at the south of Stalingrad. The 12th December, the attack is launched. They progress up to 48 km of the south flank of the Sixth Army, but are unable to go further. The Sixth Army still don't try to escape the encirclement and stay in defensive mode (following the initial order from Hitler).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2nd February 1943, 300.000 remaining German soldiers of the Sixth Army surrender at Stalingrad.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Following this, Russians launch "operation little Saturn" the 16th December. After some battles, 85.000 Italians and 60.000 Hungarians are made prisoners, and 100.000 Hungarians are killed. Almost all the territory gained during operation "case blue" is lost.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Let's go back to Army Group A. After having taken Rostov the 23rd July, they progress very fast. The 9th August, they are at Maykop, 300 km away from Rostov.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then they go west and east of Caucasus. On the west side, they take Novorossisk the 10th September. On the east side, they take Mozdok the 25th August, and they cross the Terek River, near Grozny on September 2.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
After that, the progression is very slow. They take Nalchik (90 km south-west of Mozdok) only the 27th October. Then, they take Alagir (65 km south-east of Nalchik) the 5th November.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What happens is that Russians stop retreating, and once again logistic problem arose.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In November, after several unsuccessful Soviet counterattacks, Germans decide to remain on the defensive, waiting for the spring of 1943 to resume the offensive if Stalingrad operations proved successful.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Finally, with the disaster of Stalingrad, Army group A is forced to retreat in order to avoid isolation from the rest of the German army.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Something interesting is that the Luftwaffe had the possibility of bombing oil wells and refineries of Grozny. But Hitler ordered the bombing only at the beginning of October. And on October 8, he specified that it could be done only before October 14, because aircrafts were needed for Stalingrad. Thus, bombings were done on Grozny only between the 10th and the 12th October. And at Grozny (and Maykop, which had already been taken) there was only 10 % of oil production. 90 % was at Baku (460 km at the south of Grozny, on the Caspian Sea). Germans bombers could have bombed it in August, when there was almost no Russian aircrafts there. But, no order was given at this moment.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">
1943:</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
During 1942, Germans have lost many men and material. So, in 1943, they can't even afford anymore to make a general attack on a part of the front. They can just afford to attack Russians on a limited part of it. This one is located at Kursk. But the preparation of the attack takes too much time, and because of that, Russian forces know that Hitler will attack there, and thus are extremely well prepared. Of course, the attack is a failure. After that, Germans will never be able to make such a powerful attack anymore. They are now doomed to fail.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>There are several problems with the official version:</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Why was Stalin so surprised by the war, when he had transferred all the military industry behind Ural (after 1936) precisely because he expected a war against Germany? In 1936, he was sure a war would happen, but just days before it, he didn't believe it anymore. Quite bizarre isn't it?</li>
<li>How could Stalin be surprised by the invasion, when he knew that the whole German army was mobilized just behind the frontier? It doesn't make sense. Historians say Stalin thought it was just a threat and told his generals not to react to this provocation. But you can't believe in such a thing when the whole army is just behind the frontier and your secret services tell you the invasion is imminent, especially with someone as erratic as Hitler, and who had invaded so many countries in just two years. And even if you believe it's just a threat, you send your army, and put it in maximum alert, just in case. So, the reaction of Stalin is extremely fishy.</li>
<li>And if Stalin feared a war against Germany, why did he make the Great purges which totally disorganized the soviet army? Not really the good moment for doing that.</li>
<li>German lost 800.000 men during 1941. But they sent the same amount of men for reinforcement during the beginning of 1942. Thus, in 1942, Germans should have still been vastly superior to Russians, and they should have been able to attack at least on two fronts. So, how could the German armies be so weak in 1942 that they were able to attack Russians only on one part of the front?</li>
<li>Funny, there was no collapse of the Russian army on several points of the front as there was with the Anglo-French army. The Russian army was even less mobile, was less organized, and was much more surprised about the German attack than the Anglo-French army was. But no, no collapse of the front, no chaos. What a chance.</li>
<li>How could Russians avoid so easily encirclements by just retreating, since they were supposed to have problem of mobility and since encirclements were made by panzer armies, which were extremely mobile?</li>
<li>During operation case blue (1942), how could Hitler and German generals believe erroneously that Russians were in full flight, since they could see with their planes that it wasn't the case at all?</li>
<li>Why did Hitler absolutely want to take Stalingrad, while it had no strategic value and the battle would obviously lead to huge losses of men since the German army couldn't use blitzkrieg there?</li>
<li>Why did Hitler maintain the attack of Stalingrad, while he was perfectly informed that Russians were amassing tons of troops on his flanks?</li>
<li>Why didn't Hitler try to recruit non-Russian people (and even Russian ones) to fight against Soviets? As communism and Russia (for Non-Russians) were not appreciated at all by people, they would have been more than willing to fight against the Soviet army.</li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Knowing what we already know about Hitler, it is clear that if things happened the way they did, it's because the defeat was planned since the beginning. Hitler's strategic and organizational mistakes were made voluntarily.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hitler had to win at the beginning. Otherwise: 1) He couldn't have gathered Russian jews; 2) Germans wouldn't have got enough time to make the so called holocaust (of course, it's a lie, but we are talking about official history here); 3) it would have seemed strange that he was beaten so quickly after all the previous successes; 4) the front could have stayed immobile, none of both camp being able to take the advantage. But, as Jewish leaders had sold the concept of German Blitzkrieg to the world, it would have seemed strange that suddenly, the war was like WWI and that Germans weren't able to make a massive breakthrough; 5) as England and the USA were not ready yet to invade Germany, Stalin would have possessed all Europe if he had won. And that's not what was planned by Jewish leaders. Or Russia would have not taken all those territories from Central Europe, but then, there wouldn't have been the very powerful Soviet Bloc. And Jewish leaders wanted this. Or Stalin would have taken the territories from Central Europe as he did historically. But then, without the Allied forces in front of him, it would have been difficult to explain why he didn't take more territories.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is because Hitler had to win at the beginning that we are said that Stalin didn't believe in the invasion and forced his troops to stay inactive during the first day of the battle. It made it easier to explain the retreat of the Russians.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But, of course, Hitler should not win completely. And he had to make mistakes: before Operation Barbarossa, and immediately after the first victories. Events also had to be against him. Thus, his inability to win during 1941 and 1942 would seem to be logical.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Let's see the mistakes he had to make before operation Barbarossa.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
German tanks and other kind of weapons and equipment had to have a very complicated design, and thus to be produced extremely slowly; whereas Russian weapons had to be much more standardized and be produced en masse. It permitted to explain the lack of tanks and aircrafts during battles against Russians during late 1941 and 1942 (and after of course), and thus, a part of the defeat.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He also had to declare the war too early. By declaring it just one year after the battle of France, the lack of proper equipment could be explained (and of course, the two front war).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
By not making a total mobilization of Germany (regarding men and equipment) and not demanding an important effort from his allies as soon as 1941, the fact that he did not win in 1941 or 1942 could also be explain. And that was also made on purpose.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He had to start the operation too late. Thus, it would allow to explain why he wasn't able to win totally during Barbarossa.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The German army also had to lack winter equipment. This would allow to explain why they were forced to retreat during winter.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>During operation Barbarossa and after</b>, all the so called strategic mistakes or the supposedly reasonable decisions leading to a failure were of course made on purpose.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Not using Ukrainians, Latvians, Russians, etc.., as soldiers against the soviet regime was also intentional. With their help, Hitler would have got much more soldiers fighting for him; and things could have been very different (80 million of them were under German domination). But, as the real goal of Hitler the jew was to lose, using them was out of the question.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On the northern front, the two stops of 6 days each of the 56th Panzer Corps were necessary. Otherwise, Panzers of Army Group North would have taken Leningrad as soon as July. Then, maybe the entire Soviet north front would have fallen.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The 16th German Army also had to be diverted from rushing toward Leningrad. It had to help Army Group Center to fight on its left wing and thus losing precious days. And the 56th Panzer Corps had to be called to help the 16th Army near the 12th August. Otherwise, once again, maybe Leningrad would have been conquered.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On the center front, the decision of stopping the attack in order to help the northern front and the southern front (at Kiev) was also made with the purpose to make fail operation Barbarossa. If Germans had attacked Moscow near the 20th July 1941, they would have taken it during August or mid-September. And if Moscow had fallen, all the Soviets forces of the northern front would have fallen also, because the town was an enormous railroad and road center; thus the northern front wouldn't have been resupplied anymore. As Hitler had to lose the war against Russians, such a thing wasn't possible. So, Hitler had to suspend the attack against Moscow.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, <b>the salient of Kiev</b> was a threat. But this salient was also made on purpose. Why would Stalin let such a salient with so many men inside when things went so bad, thus when there was such a risk of having it encircled by German? It was extremely dangerous. But in fact, it was made in order to justify the stop of Army group Center before Moscow. Without this salient, there was no reason for Army Group Center to stop attacking the center of the front. Then, front center would have fallen and the northern front would have fallen quickly after that. The fact that Stalin let his troops stay in this salient of Kiev during one month and a half (from the 15th July to the end of August) shows quite clearly that he wanted Germans to attack there and his one million soldiers to be made prisoners.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And finally, attacking Moscow at the end of September, when winter was almost there, was also made in order to make operation Barbarossa fail.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The fact that winter clothes weren't brought fast enough and that the weapons weren't adapted to the extreme cold of the Russian winter was once again something staged. It allowed to explain partly why Germans lost during the battle of Moscow.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Finally, the enormous quantities of German soldiers and weapons lost during 1941 permitted to explain why during 1942, Germans weren't able to attack on the entire front as they did in 1941.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>In 1942</b>, as Germans armies were now quite advanced in the Russian territory, the next attack from them had to lead to nowhere (regarding military strategy). They couldn't once again make major encirclements, as in 1941; because maybe Germans would have been able to destroy a part of the front, and things could have become quite dangerous for Russians. Germans making a lot of prisoners would also have been problematic for the end of 1942 and for 1943. Imagine Germans making 1 million prisoners. Then, the Russian counter-attack from fall of 1942 would normally have been much less successful. So, the attack had to be made in a part of the front where Russians could retreat, thus avoiding encirclements. And the main goal of Germans shouldn't be encirclements, but taking control of some territories. That way, Russians just retreating an not being killed or made prisoners wouldn't be so much of a problem for Germans.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This means Germans couldn't attack at the center of the front; because there, Russians couldn't retreat. Retreating would indeed have led to the fall of Moscow, and the fall of Moscow would have led to the fall of the northern front. Russians couldn't stay there and defend the Moscow area either. Because in this case, the problem is that normally an attack there would have been a success (since Germans were still quite powerful), and would have led to the conquest of Moscow by Germans, and thus to the fall of the northern front; and maybe to the destruction of front center. So, not retreating wouldn't have been a solution either.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The other possible side for the attack could have been the north. But an important advance there could have allowed to destroy the armies fighting against Finland and thus, to make a major breakthrough. Moscow and the center of the front would have been threatened. So, attacking there could have been dangerous for the plan of Jewish leaders.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is why Hitler had to attack in the south. At the south, Russians could retreat on a long distance without losing crucial territories. And as the main goal of Hitler was to take oil (thus mainly to gain territory), German forces would not try very much to destroy Russian forces and to make a major breakthrough.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Regarding the goal of operation "case blue", the rest of the war showed that finally Germans didn't have so many problem of oil. They were able to produce enough oil to continue the war against Russians during 1943 and 1944. So, attacking there was far from being absolutely necessary. But, of course, this wrong estimation was once again voluntarily made by Hitler.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
From the beginning, the operation was very hazardous, because it implied splitting Army Group South into two. And the group fighting the most would have a lot of Italian, Hungarian and Romanian troops, which were supposed to be much less reliable and less equipped than German ones. So, it was sure that with only a half of Army Group South and many soldiers of a lesser quality, it would be difficult to beat Russians. And of course, it would be much more difficult to make large encirclements and take many prisoners. But, as the goal was to lose this battle, it was a very good thing for Hitler.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The goal of reaching Stalingrad was strange. Normally, the goal of Germans should have been to reach the Caspian Sea as quickly as possible, in order to cut Russian troops located in the Caucasus from the rest of the Russian army. It would have been very difficult for Russians to prevent this from happening. And once this done, a little retreat from Germans wouldn't have opened Russians the way toward the Caucasus. Whereas with the strategy of taking only Stalingrad: first, the road toward the Caucasus wasn't entirely blocked; and second, if Stalingrad was taken back, the Russians could easily send reinforcements again toward the Caucasus.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, Hitler's goal wasn't completely absurd or stupid (of course if he had got a genuine will of winning), because, without the oil of Caucasus, Russians would have been in a bad situation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He was even quite close of reaching it. But once again, very fishy "mistakes", so called bad luck and fierce defense from Russians led him to lose.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
First, surroundings of May 12-28 at Kharkov, leading to 270.000 Russian prisoners, and the fact that Stalin thought erroneously Germans would go to the north after Voronezh were required in order to allow Germans' first successes. Otherwise, Germans forces wouldn't have been able to advance so quickly and wouldn't have been so dispersed; thus the final success of Russian forces would have seemed fishier. So, Stalin perfectly knew they would go to the south, and the success at Kharkov was planned by Jewish leaders. It was the same thing regarding the ability of Russians to flee quickly enough not to be caught up by Germans. Normally, with their panzers, Germans should have been able to rejoin Russians and to overtake them very quickly. So, this strange ability to flee faster than the panzers was required for the success of the Jewish plan (which was: to let the Germans disperse themselves enormously, to let them be trapped in Stalingrad, to destroy a great part of the German forces at Stalingrad and after, and finally to make them retreat toward the front line of April 1942).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Second, encirclements were supposed to be one goal of this operation. But, after the first success, what a bad luck, each time they failed, either because of problems of supplies or because Soviet counter-attacks delayed their advance.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And at the beginning, Hitler thought wrongly that Russians were in full flight, thus, he didn't try to pursue them. This erroneous estimation of the situation was of course fully wanted.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Another justification of the lack of successful encirclements is that finally, encirclements weren't really a major goal of the operation. The main goal was to reach Stalingrad. So, Jewish leaders could justify that encirclements weren't pursue with all the necessary will because they were just a goal of secondary importance.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The third kind of voluntary "mistakes" was to split regularly the effort of his armies, leading to fatal delays regarding offensives and weaker attacks. The first of this kind was splitting Army Group South into two Army Groups (Groups A and B). The second one was making Fourth Panzer Army going to the south to help Army Group A to cross the Don (something justified by the fact that Hitler thought Russians were in full flight). It allowed to delay the success of the attack of Army group B (also to cross the Don). The third one was splitting Fourth Panzer army into two, with one part going toward the Caspian Sea and the second one toward Stalingrad. The fourth one was with Army Group South, one part going to the west and the other to the east.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Attacking Stalingrad was another voluntary "mistake". There was no reason at all to take Stalingrad. Germans were already controlling the roads leading to the south. But the plan of Jewish leaders was to make Germans lose at Stalingrad; so Hitler had to send them conquer the town. Creating a salient and leaving Italian, Romanian and Hungarian troops (that is weaker ones) defend the flanks, thus making sure that those wouldn't resist against Russian assaults, was once again intentional. Letting the 6th army stay in Stalingrad, even though Hitler knew there were tons of Russian troops amassing near his flanks was also wanted. Same thing about forbidding the 6th army to try to break out once it was surrounded.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, withdrawing a substantial number of aircrafts to the Mediterranean Sea just before operation Uranus was also made with the purpose of making Germans lose at Stalingrad.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Not bombing oil fields of Baku during August, and bombing those of Grozny only between the 10th and the 12th October, was another false mistake.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We can also think that the weakening of Russian attacks at the beginning of 1942 was made in order to justify that Hitler got the impression that Russians were exhausted.</div>
<br />
<br />hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-66060684990729112942013-07-31T21:55:00.003-07:002014-04-05T03:31:23.096-07:00The strange clemency of the USA and Britain toward Germany after World War I<div style="text-align: justify;">
Just after WWI, the treaty of Versailles (June 1919) forced Germany to pay reparations to several countries it had fought. Germany had to pay 20 billion gold-marks before May 1921. A commission had to estimate the total amount of reparations Germany would finally pay. In 1921, at the conference of London, the final estimation of the amount due was 132 billion gold-marks. The repartition was the following: France 52 %, England 22 %, Belgium 10 %, Italy 8 %, and 8 % for other Allies.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But, immediately, voices in England said the reparations were unfair for Germany and bad for the European economy. It started with a book from the famous economist John Maynard Keynes "The Economic Consequences of the Peace" (1919), which knew a great success.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Those fears about economic problems caused by the payment of reparations seemed to become real when hyperinflation hit Germany (between 1923 and 1924). At least, the USA and England seemed to think so. Then, Germany declared it could not pay the reparations and asked for a moratorium.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Quickly, the USA, more and more followed by England, didn't stop pushing for a decrease of the amount of reparations and finally, for an annulation of them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
France, on the other side, which had been hit very hard by the war, defended the idea that reparations had to be paid until the last gold-mark. When Germany said in 1923 it couldn't pay, France, with Belgium, invaded the Ruhr in order to get paid (by taking control of mines, industries, etc…). But, being under the pressure of the USA and England and isolated diplomatically, France finally evacuated the Ruhr in 1925. And progressively, it accepted more and more decreases of the German reparations, until finally, the payment ceased.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, the USA and England were indeed very merciful with Germany.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<a name='more'></a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Some things are quite strange regarding this clemency and the reasons of it:</div>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>The USA were already entirely controlled by Jewish leaders and Freemasons (as France and Belgium). Why would jews from the USA let European countries get all the money? They would have certainly asked for a part of it.</li>
<li>Even if we stay in the official history, the USA government was not known for its selflessness. So, they would most probably have wanted a part of the German reparations. And they would have some reasons to ask for it. They lost many young men during the war. They were forced to invest in the war machine, which is not productive. They had legitimacy to ask for this.</li>
<li>England and the USA should have been very happy with the German reparations. Germany was their greatest economic competitor. With the reparations, England and the USA had the opportunity to gain market shares. France just played second fiddle. It wasn't a great threat. And France had to reconstruct a part of its economy. So, the reparations weren't going to give it a decisive economic advantage. So, the only great adversary was Germany. And England and the USA weren't known to be apologists of economic equilibrium. For example, the USA was very happy with the poverty of countries from South America; it didn't want to have an economic power which would become a competitor there. And when the economic crisis hit the Occidental countries in 1929, England and the USA should have been more eager to weaken Germany. Thus, why try to favor Germany? And as Germany didn't waste its money on military things anymore, it had a very important economic advantage against Britain and the USA. It was quite unfair. So, Britain and the USA should have taken the reparations as a way to reduce this unfair disadvantage.</li>
<li>Germany was still an economic giant. With England, it was the factory of Europe. As war was over, they didn't have to pay incredible amounts of money anymore into the war machine. Also, as Germany didn't have to maintain an extremely costly army anymore (its army was reduced to only 100.000 soldiers), its economy was extremely advantaged. So, there was no risk at all for Germany to fall into economic depression. The best proof is that they were able to rearm. It has been estimated that rearmament cost yearly 7 times more than would have cost reparations each year. And for example, in 1928, Germany was making 10 % of all world commercial exchanges (13 % in 1913). It was once again first in chemistry, optic, electro-technic, and mechanical industries. The USA and Germany knew all that of course. So, why fear that Germany would fall into economic chaos or depression?</li>
<li>The quick change of opinion of England regarding the reparations is a little too shady. At first, they accept the idea of reparations. They accept to get 22 % of the total amount. And they accept the amount of 132 million gold-marks in 1921. And suddenly, after just three or four years they change their idea and decide it won't be good for the economy and political stability of Europe. Of course, in-between, there had been the German hyperinflation. But still. They could have thought, as France, that it was a trick from Germany in order to avoid paying. And because of points 3 and 4, they wouldn't have thought that the situation of Germany was catastrophic.</li>
<li>Of course, there could have been the ultimate argument that Germany could fall into political chaos and would finally become a communist country. But as Germany had no army, there was no risk of anything like this. If such a thing had become real, France would have invaded Germany and in one month, would have re-established a democratic government. If we consider things with a more conspirationist point of view, we can add England and the USA knew that as Germany was then a democracy controlled by jews and freemasons, there was no more risk of rebellion from people than there was in Jewish controlled countries as France or England or the USA, etc... In such a case, the Jewish controlled government would have killed as many people as required, and the rebellion would have ended very quickly. Thus, the only threat with Germany was an economic one, eventually. But we have seen that this threat was phony. So, why did the USA and England fear so much about an economic or a political chaos in Germany?</li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If you analyze the situation via the theory that Hitler was a Zionist jew working for more powerful Jewish leaders who wanted to create Israel and to push ordinary jews to go there, you have another version of the story.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Reality, my friends, is the following.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Jewish leaders planned to have WWII nearly twenty year after the first one. They needed this amount of time after WWI in order to stage all the events leading to WWII. They planned this at least 80 years before those events happened.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But, during all this time, Germany was going to rearm, to rebuild its army. Thus, as this rearmament couldn't stay unknown from England and France, the question was going to be: "why France didn't attack Germany when its army was still weak? Why didn't France do anything?". As France had suffered enormously from WWI, it should have been totally inflexible about any attempt of rearmament coming from Germany. The immediate consequences of it should have been an invasion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, Jewish leaders had to create the conditions which would explain why France didn't attack Germany when it was still possible to do it with very few losses.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
During the 30's there was the explanation that the German army wasn't negligible anymore and that as French people were traumatized by WWI, they didn't want to fight another war. This is why pacifism dominated the French political life. But it was credible only during the 30's, when Germany's army was once again quite powerful.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the 20's, as Germany's army was very weak, it was difficult to sustain this idea to explain the lack of action from the French government.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The feebleness, the cowardice and the chaotic aspect (of course staged) of the democratic French government was a good start. But it wasn't enough at all to explain its lack of action. After all, few years before, the French government had been able to win a war against Germany.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, in order to explain this, Jewish leaders staged a phony opposition between the Anglosphere (England-USA) and France.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Reparations had to be imposed on Germany with the agreement of England, France and other allies. But very soon after, England and the USA had to show concern about a possible economic and political instability caused by them. These fears had to seem to become real with the German hyperinflation of 1923-24 (of course, this hyperinflation was created and organized by Jewish leaders). Then, England and the USA had to go back on their decision and to put the pressure on France to renounce to get paid by Germany. The argument from the Anglosphere would be that those reparations were undermining the world economy and the political stability of Europe. And thus, for the sake of the economic prosperity and political stability, France and the other beneficiaries of the reparations had to accept a reduction of the amount of reparations, or even to accept not being paid.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As England was being paid reparations by Germany and was a European country which had been quite hardly hit by the war, they had to be in an in-between situation which would evolve quite quickly. At first, they had to approve France (and Belgium) during the Ruhr affair. But quickly, they would break away from the action of those two countries and would promote with the USA an ever more important decrease of the amount of reparations.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In this relationship, France would be the weak one and England and the USA the strong ones. At the beginning, France would protest and would even act independently (with the Ruhr invasion of 1923 for example, made with Belgium). But after some time, France would obey to the English-American influence and would renounce to get paid. Of course, reparations were not the point. Jewish leaders didn't mind at all about the reparations. It was just a mean and not an end. The point was that France would renounce to invade Germany (because they would feel diplomatically pressured and isolated). The main goal of Jewish leaders was to explain partly why France didn't try to invade Germany whereas this one was slowly rearming.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What the psychodrama of the reparations allowed is that an invasion of Germany by France would be seen as a try to get the reparations by force. France could have claimed it only wanted to prevent a rearmament from Germany, people would have said the true goal for France was to get paid. And as England and the USA were on the side of Germany, there would have been diplomatic pressure and maybe even economic retaliations from them against France. As the French government was presented as weak and coward, the fear of being diplomatically pressured and isolated was supposed to be enough to explain why France didn't try to invade Germany after this Anglo-French psychodrama.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, most of the other countries benefiting from the reparations would remain silent and neutral (except Belgium. France couldn't be entirely isolated; it would have seemed strange). This is because if they had united with France against England and the USA, it would have been difficult to explain why France finally renounced to get paid. France had to be almost alone in this affaire in order to explain why it renounced to the reparations.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All this had to lead to the impression that the Anglosphere was clement with Germany and hard with France. Somewhere, Germany was almost the new ally of England and the USA, and France was almost an enemy. Thus, France would not dare to invade the whole Germany.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is why the USA could not demand reparations from Germany (whereas it would have been perfectly normal for them to claim a part of them). If they had been involved, them forcing France to abandon the payment would have seemed strange. But because of that, Jewish leaders have introduced another logical problem ("why didn't the USA demand reparations from Germany?").</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, John Maynard Keynes wrote his book on behalf of Jewish leaders. Certainly, John Maynard Keynes was a jew. His face is very Jewish. And his name is a derivative of Kahn or Cain, which are Jewish names. And his international celebrity, which is still intact nowadays, shows clearly he was a jew. Jewish leaders don't let Gentiles economists access to such a celebrity. So, Jewish leaders asked him to write a book in which he would defend the idea that German reparations were unfair and a threat on European prosperity and stability. And as a good sayanim, Keynes wrote it (or a think tank wrote it for him).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The hyperinflation of 1923 in Germany had also another goal. It allowed Jewish leaders to make Germans angry and consequently to boost the popularity of Hitler. Same thing for the invasion of the Ruhr by France. So, with the reparations, Jewish leaders could kill two birds with one stone: they could explain partly why France didn't invade Germany when the later began to rearm, and they could explain partly the anger of Germans and the rise of Hitler.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The 6th chapter of the book of Keynes (about the situation of countries of Central Europe) was so apocalyptic that it was ridiculous. Keynes predicted millions of death because of a hypothetical economic collapse. Nothing like that happened of course (in Germany or in other countries from Central Europe). And, as we have seen in point 4, Germany was still an economic giant. Keynes also thought goods wouldn't be transported to people because of the failure of the transport system. But during WWI, there was no problem to transport goods. Then, why would have there been any problem after the war? But the book of Keynes had to be exaggerated like this. Keynes had to make an apocalyptic presentation of the European situation (and especially the German one) in his pamphlet. English and U.S governments, and the newspapers, all controlled by Jewish leaders, also had to seem to take this ridiculous theory very seriously. And when there was hyperinflation in Germany, they had to apparently think that it fully confirmed the thoughts of Keynes. All this, in order to finally explain why France didn't invade Germany when the later was rearming.<br />
<br />
PS: of course, some will say that the German rearmament began to take place only after 1933, which would make my theory pointless. But, even in 1933, it is still valid. And in fact, rearmament took place long before 1933. There has been a hidden rearmament since 1919. You can't create such an army in just 5 or 6 years.</div>
<br />hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-39855936670327532342013-07-24T07:23:00.000-07:002013-07-24T08:27:16.796-07:00Yes, 99 % of websites saying Hitler was a jew or an agent are made by jews<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the nationalist community, many people say that the stories of Hitler being a jew are bullshit, because they are told by jews. In the conspirationist community they say they are told by jews, or illuminati agents or CIA agents, etc… So, for them, those stories are phony.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
And yes, they are right.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Indeed, 99 % of the websites saying Hitler was a jew are run by jews and are talking bullshit.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, it is perfectly understandable that most of those people think that Hitler wasn't a jew or an agent and that those stories are phony.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the conspirationist community, people are more receptive to the idea that Hitler was a jew or a mason. So, there are much more people believing that Hitler was not what he seemed to be than in the nationalist community. But usually, they are more easily deceived about the whole story than nationalists who have begun to understand what all this was about.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The question is: why would Jewish leaders do such a thing?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At first sight, it doesn't make any sense.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If it was false, if Hitler was really a Gentile Nazi, why would Jewish leaders make so many websites of this kind? It wouldn't make any sense. I mean, they have a golden story. With Hitler being a real Gentile Nazi, they have the perfect Gentile bad guy. They can make Gentiles feel guilty during centuries about the bad Hitler killing poor jews, and the vile Gentiles doing nothing to stop him. They have the perfect incarnation of evil. It has worked perfectly well for 60 years. Why would they kill the goose that lays the golden eggs? Why introduce confusion?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<a name='more'></a>And if it was true, at first sight, it still doesn't make any sense. If Hitler was really a Zionist jew working for more powerful Jewish leaders, the later would do anything to avoid the awakening of people regarding this question. They would do anything to prevent people from understanding this enormous plot. Thus, sending their valets in order to say that Hitler was a jew, or an agent is absurd. They had a perfect situation where people believed the official theory without questioning it. The deception was perfect. And suddenly, they would destroy themselves all the good work, regarding such a crucial topic? Incredible.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But, if Hitler was a Zionist jew, there is one case which makes this behavior logical: it's if people begin to understand. In this case, it can be profitable to reveal a part of the truth. By doing this, you deceive people into theories which will neutralize the revolutionary potential of the complete truth. Thus, people still don't understand the real deal, and you still win. In fact, doing this is even necessary. If you don't do that, then you let the field open to real truthers. And quickly, there will be many people believing the right version of the story. Maybe even if there is only a threat that people begin to understand, it can be enough to begin to send valets to reveal half-truths.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, to the question "why would Jewish leaders do such a thing"? The answer is: Because it's true, and because some people began to understand the truth, or because Jewish leaders feared that some people would soon be able to understand it. And if the truth about Hitler was known by gentiles and ordinary jews, it would be apocalyptic for Jewish leaders. Thus, they need to introduce confusion in order to avoid having Gentiles and ordinary jews to be able to understand what is going on.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is why you can have 99 % of the website saying Hitler was a jew being run by jews themselves and still the story be true.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, Jewish leaders could also say this theory is bullshit and make people feel guilty to think about such a "stupid" thing. The problem with this solution is that it's not 2001 anymore. Conspirationism is now much more widespread. A lot people would believe that Hitler was a zionist jew. And it would spread quickly. They use this solution, but much less than the confusion strategy. They use it for ordinary people and for nationalists, but not for conspirationists (who are the people who really count in that matter). It's a complementary solution, but not the main one.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The other problem is that, as we have seen in another <a href="http://hitler-the-jew-and-the-faked-wwii.blogspot.fr/2013/05/why-did-jewhis-leaders-reveal-that.html" target="_blank">article</a>, ordinary jews know that Hitler was jewish to some extent. So, saying it's bullshit wouldn't work with jews. Thus, Jewish leaders need to introduce maximum confusion in order to avoid that jews understand the real deal. As we have seen this in another article, they have already introduced lies about Hitler being quarter jewish and a self-hating jew during the 30's. As jews are quite paranoid and knows that conspiracies are for real, if they found the real deal (like the present blog), they would very quickly understand the plot from their "beloved" leaders. And a big part of the obedience from ordinary jews toward their leaders come from their belief that they are on the same wavelength and that they all are one (money and fear and other things form the other parts).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, the idea is to introduce maximum confusion by pushing different versions of the story (which never give you the whole figure), and making quite obvious that most of the guys telling them are in fact jews or agents. This is why there are numerous versions of Hitler begin a jew, a mason, an agent, etc… The goal is to avoid that Gentiles and ordinary jews understand the real deal.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Let's remember the good version first: Hitler was a full jew put in place by more powerful Jewish leaders in order to give a reason to create Israel (the suffering of jews and the holocaust) and to push jews to go to Israel. The war was completely staged by Jewish leaders, as all the other events which took place before WWII.</div>
<br />
Now, let's see what those false versions are:<br />
<ul>
<li>Hitler was quarter Jewish and a self-hating jew. He made all this alone. He didn't work for more powerful jews. The whole story (war, holocaust, etc…) is the same, except that Hitler was quarter Jewish and hated jews because of that.</li>
<li>Hitler was a Gentile working for the illuminatis; and not for the Jewish leaders who wanted to create Israel. The goal for the illuminatis was to gain control of Germany and to have more control over people.</li>
<li>Same thing, but with Hitler being quarter Jewish.</li>
<li>Same thing. But the goal of the illuminatis was to create Israel and to push jews to migrate there. The illuminati needed to create Israel because it would be a necessary step toward the advent of the anti-Christ.</li>
<li>Quarter Jewish or not, he was a man of the illuminatis or of the Jewish leaders, but rebelled against them. This is why illuminatis or the Jewish leaders declared war on him.</li>
<li>Jewish leaders just pushed Hitler. They just helped him to get the power. But he was independent from them and after that, didn't obey them anymore.</li>
<li>He worked for the Rothschild. The intermediary goal was to create Israel and to push jews to go there. But the real goal was to create a personal kingdom for the Rothschild in Israel (thus, even Jewish leaders are a puppet of the Rothschild).</li>
<li>He worked for the British government.</li>
<li>Hitler was a reptilian and all those events were a part of a great galactic conspiracy against humanity.</li>
<li>On one or two occasions, I have seen websites giving the good version (but with few details) among false ones (Henry Markow).</li>
<li>Others… (for example, Speer Willams says that Zionist leaders are white who want to spread anti-Semitism and finally exterminate the Semitic gene)</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In those versions of the history, they will often introduce or not the following element. Hitler has indeed ordered the holocaust. For the conspirationists or the nationalists who know the holocaust is a lie (that is, most of them), it makes them reject right away the theory that Hitler was a jew or an agent. It's quite convenient. For other people, it won't prevent them from believing the story. But then, the story is finally not far from the official story (except that Hitler was illuminati). And in some versions, this will introduce discrepancies. For example, if the goal of Hitler was to send jews to Israel, why kill them? Thus, those people will believe that these conspiracy theories about Hitler are all bullshit.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
By making obvious that the guys who defend those false versions of the story are jews or masons or at least agents of the jews or the CIA, Jewish leaders make also sure to neutralize the problem. Many people will understand one day or another that those people are agents; so, they will think that those stories are phony and that the only true one is the official story (minus the holocaust part eventually). And if they don't discover that these stories are made by agents, they will believe one of those false versions which lead to nowhere. Only one or two % will understand the real truth. Thus, for Jewish leaders, the job will be done.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And with all those different versions, some of them being completely ridiculous, many people who discover them will tend to reject all this en masse.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Why did they begin to make those websites only near 2006-2007? It's because some Gentiles have very probably begun to talk about this on some websites (with the right version of course). Then, Jewish leaders knew they had to introduce confusion very quickly. Otherwise, the real deal would have been the only one present on the web. And they couldn't afford to have this situation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As we have already seen it before, Jewish leaders have already lied about Hitler in the 30's. As ordinary jews knew Hitler was jew to some extent, Jewish leaders had to promote discretely the theory that Hitler was a self-hating quarter Jew and hated jews for that. So, they made it before, but it was only for jews. And it was quite different from now. They didn't use the "confusion strategy". At this time, as they controlled entirely the media, they didn't have to use it. They just introduced one lie in order to make fit the official story with what jews already knew about Hitler. Whereas now, Jewish leaders try to introduce maximum confusion in order to maintain more or less the official theory.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-14460024707620532482013-07-04T02:13:00.002-07:002013-07-04T02:16:41.538-07:00Henry Ford was a jew or a freemason and his "anti-Semitism" was staged<div style="text-align: justify;">
I have quickly talked about Ford in the previous article. I am going to study his case further.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
According to the official history, in 1920, Henry Ford bought a newspaper called "The Deadborn Independent". He transformed it into an anti-Semite newspaper (of course, for people conscious about Jewish plots, it was not "anti-Semite", but helped people to be more conscious about Jewish power and plans: I use the word anti-Semite just for convenience). Journalists wrote the papers; but they signed many of them "Henry Ford". Ford didn't stop this, because he didn't read the papers, just the titles (according to his own words). In 1920, he published also a book (written from the newspaper articles): "The international jew". Jews pressured him to stop publishing the journal and the book, which he did in 1927.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There are several problems with this story.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
First, if Ford was the president of such a huge company, it was certainly because he was either a jew, or a mason. The USA has been controlled by jews since the beginning. Founders of America were freemasons, thus Jewish puppets. So, it was impossible for a simple Gentile to become the owner of such a big company. They can own little or medium companies, but not huge ones. Considering that he was either a jew or a mason, Henry Ford publishing an anti-Semite newspaper didn't make any sense. The only thing which could make sense is that he was ordered to do so.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Second problem, it is said in his biography that he was not good at writing and reading during his school years. It means he most probably didn't like reading. We can add to this that his career most probably was consuming all his time, so he didn't even had time to read. Thus, how did he come to know about Jewish plots, when almost nobody was talking about them? In 1918, in the USA, someone add to read a huge amount of books to finally come to know just a little bit about the Jewish power. Only people who like reading a lot, that is intellectuals, could do that. And even in that case, it was very difficult to come to those ideas, since nearly nobody talked about the Jewish problem in America at this time (just few intellectuals were doing that in Europe). And even with this knowledge, someone had to be able to accept it. Without having quite strong political opinions or being extremely open minded, it was very difficult to think it wasn't bullshit. It is still the case in 2013 for most people; so, in 1918, in the USA, it was considerably more difficult.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<a name='more'></a>Thus, as Henry Ford didn't like reading and didn't have time for this, it is almost impossible that he was able to learn about Jewish plots. The only explanation for his sudden anti-Semitism was that he was in fact a Jew or a freemason being ordered by powerful Jewish leaders to simulate anti-Semitism.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
Ford bought the Deadborn Independent in 1918. He was 55 years old. Before that he didn't show any sign of being politicized. All that did matter was his company. People don't change at 55. When you haven't been politicized during all your life, you don't become suddenly a champion of a political cause. You don't become Robin Hood when you have been Henry Ford until 55. Maybe when someone loses everything, he can eventually change. If Ford had lost everything because of jews, he could have been bitter and decided that they were his enemy. But this wasn't the case for Ford. His affairs worked perfectly. So, it's very dubious that Ford could change all of a sudden. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The reaction of Ford to the Jewish attacks is also strange. This guy was supposedly conscious that jews control the world, that they control the media, etc… He knew that they don't have mercy against their enemies. And he decided to write about them. So we could suppose that before doing that, he thought seriously about it. In this situation, there are two possibilities: either you do it unmasked and you then accept the risk of facing dangerous Jewish retaliations, or you stay anonymous and you risk much less. As Ford made all this unmasked, you could think that he was prepared to face Jewish attacks, whatever the cost. He knew that his company would be under attack, that he would be criticized by Jewish newspapers, that they would stop fighting him only when his company would be bankrupted or controlled by them, etc… But no, after just few attacks, he quickly stopped publishing the "Deadborn Independent". He also said that in fact he didn't know what his journalists wrote. If he knew he wouldn't resist after just few attacks from them, he would then have attacked them anonymously. And you can't think he overestimated his courage. A young man could have done that. But he was 55. At 55, you know your limits. So, his behavior doesn't make sense.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The reactions from jews are fishy too. If Ford was a real Gentile fighting them, they would have destroyed his company or would have taken control of it, even if he had quit attacking them. They would have never excused him. And after his death, Jewish Medias (that is Medias) would have almost never talked about him anymore. But, no, they didn't destroy nor take control of his company. They kept talking about him, and in positive terms. In 1946, Ford was lauded at the Automotive Golden Jubilee for his contributions to the automotive industry (which was controlled by jews of course). The event took place at a freemason temple. That same year, the American Petroleum Institute awarded him its first Gold Medal annual award for outstanding contributions to the welfare of humanity. The US government (controlled by jews) also asked him to produce tons of aircrafts during WWII.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Ford also demanded to have compensations from the US government in 1946 because his factory located in Germany (Cologne) had been bombed by the Allied. And he obtained them (1 million dollars). It means that a Jewish controlled government gave money to a clear anti-Semite. Extremely strange isn't it? But not strange at all if he was a jew or a Freemason.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, what we can think is that Henry Ford was a jew or a mason and that he did all those anti-Semite things because Jewish leaders ordered him to do so. In this affair, the goal of Jewish leaders was to make people think that anti-Semitism concerned every occidental nation of this time. As it plagued almost all European nations to some degree, the USA couldn't be totally free of it. It would have seemed strange. They also probably had to justify the economic help from Ford to Hitler.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The anti-Semitism of Ford also gave a reference for the anti-Semitism of Hitler and nazi. It is said that Hitler was inspired by Ford regarding his anti-Semitism. Indeed, the problem was that Germany didn't have many references regarding anti-Semitism. Latin countries like Italy, Spain, Portugal, had the French movements (like the "Action Francaise") and French intellectuals to inspire them. But Germany didn't have that kind of thing (and Jewish leaders couldn't use the French as a reference for Germans, since they were enemies). Jewish leaders didn't use German intellectuals to write anti-Semite books before the rise of Hitler; probably to avoid having a political movement already existing before the rise of Hitler. And as Germany had to be the aggressor during WWI, it was difficult to say that it was a Jewish controlled government. Thus, the rise of the German anti-Semitism could come only after WWI. And, as there was a lack of intellectual references to explain where Hitler found his ideas and information about jews, Ford was mandated by Jewish leaders to be at least one of the sources of inspiration of Hitler.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is because those things were made on command that Ford didn't suffer any real consequences from them. As his role was only temporary, he was meant to be forgiven by jews. As Jewish leaders probably don't have tons of good servants, they can't throw them out of the game without facing quickly a shortage of personnel. Plus, they can make gentiles and ordinary jews think either that jews can forgive anti-Semites, or that jews aren't so powerful that they can destroy the life of a powerful gentile (thus, that the Jewish power is a myth).</div>
<br />hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-81583674834276328762013-07-01T00:46:00.002-07:002013-07-01T00:46:54.645-07:00Nationalist movements and individuals in France, England, and the USA were also phony<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, all the presidents of democratic countries and dictators involved in WWII were jews. Their political movements were also full of jews. But there was another case. In democratic countries, there were also famous Anti-Semite or racists individuals, and nationalist movements which didn't succeed (into taking the power). All of them were jews (or at least freemasons) or run by jews. As Jewish leaders were able to control much greater and powerful political movements, it was kids play for them to do that.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />As they didn't succeed in promoting their ideas or taking the power, people think they were real nationalists or Anti-semites. Real ones who were blocked on the road of power or were silenced (for individuals) because of the jews running those countries. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But, they were indeed jews. Their role was to make people think that racism and anti-Semitism was plaguing every important country. You couldn't have, dictators, fascists or Nazis in Italy, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Greece, etc…, and not having anti-Semites, racists, or anti-democratic movements and individuals in France, USA and Britain. Anti-Semitism, anti-democracy, and racism had to be almost everywhere (in different degrees).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It was also good to make gentiles of those countries feel guilty (once the war finished), and to feed the paranoia of the average jew.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As all those political movements of the 20's and 30's couldn't appear all of a sudden, nationalist, racist or/and anti-Semite movements and writers had to appear long before that. This is why there were people like Joseph Arthur de Gobineau (19th century), Edouard Drumont (fall of 19th century), the "Action Française" (beginning of the 20th century), etc… Those French intellectual and political movements influenced political life of Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Greece of the 20's and 30's.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, this list is limited to only three or four county, because in many European countries, nationalists have won (and we are talking about political movements which didn't succeed). And in Russia, there was the communist dictatorship (so, it was impossible for other political movements to exist). Thus, the list is limited only to democratic countries. France and England are the main countries concerned by this phenomenon, but the USA also.</div>
<br />
In this category we have:<br /><br />President of Ford Motor Company (US): Henry Ford<br /><br />French political movements: "Action Française", "croix de feu", "Parti populaire Français"<br /><br />French writers: Louis-Ferdinand Céline, Joseph Arthur de Gobineau<br /><br />French political activist: Edouard Drumont<br /><br />UK political movements: Britons, Imperial Fascist League (IFL), British Union of Fascists (BUF)<br /><br /><br />Of course, about individuals, the acts of retaliation against them (pressure from the jews, prison, etc…) were not for real.<br /><br />So, all nationalist movements or famous nationalist individuals of this era were in fact phony.hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-25204822793574974412013-06-28T02:07:00.001-07:002013-06-28T19:59:38.974-07:00The Battle of Britain and the uncertain strategy of Hitler: other intentional "mistakes"<div style="text-align: justify;">
June 1940. France and Britain have been defeated by Germany. The British army has lost a huge part of its heavy armament and equipment while embarking at Dunkirk. Hitler begins to think about invading England. But, instead of doing this, he attacks Britain only with the Luftwaffe (which is already quite bizarre).<br />
<br />
In July, Hitler begins by attacking the boats. Then, seeing the small results of this strategy, he changes his mind and decides to destroy the royal air force (RAF) and military strategic points.<br />
<br />
Between the beginning of August and the 7th of September, Things go quite well. The RAF is on the verge of being destroyed. But, suddenly, Hitler changes once again his strategy and begins to bomb the towns.<br />
<br />
The explanation of this is that, on August 24, a German bomber sent erroneously its bombs on London while he thought he was bombing the Thameshaven refinery. The day after, the RAF sent bombers on Berlin in retaliation. Furious about this, the 7th of September, Hitler stopped attacking the RAF and military areas and began to bomb only towns. This lasted until October. Then, Hitler decided to not invade England. Thus, the military effort on England was strongly decreased. There were still some bombings (until spring 1941), but much less than during September.<br />
<br />
<br />
Those strategies and changes of strategy seem already strange even when you believe in the official theory. Hitler knew that attacking boats would not lead to anything, since the boats would go in safe areas of course. So, why try to attack boats? Then, he began to do the right thing, that is, attack the RAF and strategic points. It was good. But the new change of strategy (bombing towns) was once again very strange. He was on the point of destroying the RAF in just one month, and suddenly, because of just one little bombing on Berlin, he was suddenly dominated by his nerves, and decided to abandon completely his winning strategy? Very strange indeed.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>But, as we know that Hitler was a Jew working for more powerful Jewish leaders, in order to create Israel and to push everyday jews to go to it, and that his role was meant to be only temporary, the real explanation is easy to find.<br />
<br />
Jewish leaders didn't want England to be defeated, because otherwise, Hitler couldn't have been defeated four years later (or Russia would have conquered all Europe, which wasn't in the Jewish leaders plan either). So, Hitler couldn't invade England.<br />
<br />
In fact, he couldn't even try and fail; because if he had done it, it would have postponed the war against Russia. He would also have tried to defeat England in the Mediterranean Basin. Many things of the Jewish leaders plan couldn't have been made the same way they were made, or there would have been more discrepancies (and much stranger ones).<br />
<br />
But, Hitler couldn't remain inactive. It would have seemed bizarre. So, he had to pretend to do something. He had to attack England, but either in an inefficient way, or in an efficient one but during a limited period of time.<br />
This is why he attacked the Navy at first. He knew it would lead to nothing. That was the goal.<br />
<br />
Of course, he couldn't do only stupid things. This is why he began to attack the RAF and military strategic points (but avoided attacking strongly enough the radars, this allowed the RAF to not be crushed by the Luftwaffe).<br />
<br />
But as the success was not the real goal, it had to last only a limited amount of time. This is why he suddenly decided to bomb towns after just one month. The initial mistake of the German pilot was of course planned in order to justify this change of strategy. And the bombing of Berlin was also planned by Jewish leaders in order to justify a great anger from Hitler and thus his change of strategy.<br />
<br />
The problem of succeeding with the air attack was that people would have then wondered why Hitler wouldn't have invaded England. This is also why Hitler had to change his strategy quite soon.<br />
<br />
The bombings of England also allowed Jewish leaders to goad English people. They had to excite their hate. Otherwise, there would have been just few soldiers killed in the fight against Germany. Jewish leaders had to transform this war into a dirty one, in order to explain why Britain wanted to fight to the death. Of course, war would have continued without the bombings. But, it allowed Jewish leaders to present another reason why Britain was still fighting.<br />
<br />
Finally, with the abandon from Hitler of the invasion plan, he didn't have to justify anymore his strategy against England (and thus, his mistakes). Otherwise the absurdity of this strategy would have been more and more obvious and difficult to justify.<br />
<br />
The Luftwaffe would also have lost too many aircrafts. Thus, Germany wouldn't have got huge air superiority against Russia. And the first months of advance in the Russian territory would have been more difficult to explain.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, those mistakes from Hitler weren't mistakes at all, of course. They had been planned since the beginning.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-32431665610314536952013-06-26T04:06:00.001-07:002013-06-26T04:20:58.462-07:00Hitler doing masonic handshakes and signs<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves/>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
<w:LidThemeOther>FR</w:LidThemeOther>
<w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>
<w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
<w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
<w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
<w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
</w:Compatibility>
<m:mathPr>
<m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
<m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
<m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
<m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
<m:dispDef/>
<m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
<m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
<m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
<m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
</m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"
DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="267">
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Tableau Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
</style>
<![endif]--><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Here are
some photos and paintings with Hitler doing masonic handshakes and signs.</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FAU4nXgaps8/UcrE-htrxoI/AAAAAAAAACU/msRTTVk_Dnc/s1600/hitler_masonic_sign_1937_Knirr.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FAU4nXgaps8/UcrE-htrxoI/AAAAAAAAACU/msRTTVk_Dnc/s1600/hitler_masonic_sign_1937_Knirr.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: xx-small; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">A clear masonic sign with the left hand (the two middle fingers are stuck together while the others are separated from them, an unnatural position)</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: xx-small; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">This first image is in fact a painting from Heinrich Knirr (made in 1937).</span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Of course, skeptics could think that maybe Knirr invented this masonic sign and Hitler never did it. But historians say Knirr made his paintings from Heinrich Hoffmann's photos. And he tried to just copy the photo the most faithfully possible. There is just one painting from life of Adolf Hitler: it's a portrait made by Knirr in 1935, at Berchtesgaden. All the other ones were made from photos.</span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">You could also make the hypothesis that maybe Knirr was a freemason himself and that he maliciously painted this masonic hand sign. But, if Hitler and the Nazi regime had been what they seemed to be, Knirr would never have dared to do that. As the portrait would be seen by everybody, he would have feared that some antimasonic Nazi would have been able to recognize the masonic sign. Then he would have been sent in prison or in a concentration camp, or even executed. He would have never taken such a risk just for the little pleasure of putting a masonic sign on a painting of Hitler.</span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">So, it's indeed Hitler who did this masonic sign.</span><br />
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span><br />
<a name='more'></a><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Anyway, there is another image with Hitler doing the same sign. And this time, it's a photo.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5sLT_lBocH0/UcrGigl64iI/AAAAAAAAAC0/W0m0b8iyQ0s/s1600/hitler_masonic_sign-1925.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5sLT_lBocH0/UcrGigl64iI/AAAAAAAAAC0/W0m0b8iyQ0s/s320/hitler_masonic_sign-1925.jpg" width="224" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: xx-small; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"> The same masonic hand sign (photo from 1925, soon after Hitler was released from Landsberg prison)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Another painting made by Heinrich Knirr shows another kind of masonic sign. </span></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZDeAOvMl9_8/UcrFfwb2KWI/AAAAAAAAACc/tnDcmkGiKqk/s1600/hitler_masonic_sign_1935_Knirr.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZDeAOvMl9_8/UcrFfwb2KWI/AAAAAAAAACc/tnDcmkGiKqk/s320/hitler_masonic_sign_1935_Knirr.jpg" width="232" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-s-y4bijNTrU/UcrFqQx9_cI/AAAAAAAAACk/RaTJrNpgdWg/s1600/Hitler_masonic_sing_1935_Heinrich_Hoffmann_photo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-s-y4bijNTrU/UcrFqQx9_cI/AAAAAAAAACk/RaTJrNpgdWg/s320/Hitler_masonic_sing_1935_Heinrich_Hoffmann_photo.jpg" width="233" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"> The painting from Knirr is once again made from a Heinrich Hoffmann's photo (taken in October 1935)</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZDeAOvMl9_8/UcrFfwb2KWI/AAAAAAAAACg/K5-m-FIyHQ4/s1600/hitler_masonic_sign_1935_Knirr.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">This time, it's a lion paw (left hand). If the fingers made a 90° angle with the fist, you could say it doesn't mean anything. But here, the fingers are making an angle of between 30 and 45 degrees with the hand. It's a very unnatural position. Thus, it's clearly the masonic sign of a lion paw.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">The following photos are about Hitler doing masonic handshakes (thanks to thirdeyewise who posted them <a href="http://newsfromatlantis.freeforums.org/the-nazi-jews-t1959-20.html" target="_blank">here</a>)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4igKLJ5qrD4/UcrKQ9nJTLI/AAAAAAAAADM/gfplQmn7GhU/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="302" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4igKLJ5qrD4/UcrKQ9nJTLI/AAAAAAAAADM/gfplQmn7GhU/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TeDhSchBcS4/UcrKQ4EdHhI/AAAAAAAAADE/ez7oiG-cmOE/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="235" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TeDhSchBcS4/UcrKQ4EdHhI/AAAAAAAAADE/ez7oiG-cmOE/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZyVGz5--noM/UcrKQ9Wf5rI/AAAAAAAAADI/aPeuJR4MlGE/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZyVGz5--noM/UcrKQ9Wf5rI/AAAAAAAAADI/aPeuJR4MlGE/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_3.jpg" width="225" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZV7E0rdu6Tc/UcrKRRvJCtI/AAAAAAAAADU/ycs23Nx1qQk/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="220" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZV7E0rdu6Tc/UcrKRRvJCtI/AAAAAAAAADU/ycs23Nx1qQk/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_4.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-I0OG8Of2kIQ/UcrKRU2yWxI/AAAAAAAAADY/8WugDo6XYhM/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-I0OG8Of2kIQ/UcrKRU2yWxI/AAAAAAAAADY/8WugDo6XYhM/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_5.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Ak_CA9eJwRk/UcrKRsbi9wI/AAAAAAAAADc/NVZjh_vMq5I/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_6.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="281" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Ak_CA9eJwRk/UcrKRsbi9wI/AAAAAAAAADc/NVZjh_vMq5I/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_6.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JPVNnE1KNGY/UcrKSB6estI/AAAAAAAAADs/8BIVFT2JdsY/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_7.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="239" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JPVNnE1KNGY/UcrKSB6estI/AAAAAAAAADs/8BIVFT2JdsY/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_7.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OHjrYK4eT5g/UcrKSFL-w4I/AAAAAAAAAD0/rnsSLPvrbYU/s1600/hitler_masonic_handshake_8.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OHjrYK4eT5g/UcrKSFL-w4I/AAAAAAAAAD0/rnsSLPvrbYU/s320/hitler_masonic_handshake_8.png" width="226" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">So, why would Hitler do masonic handshakes and signs, if he was for real? Why was the supreme chief of the Nazi party, someone who was supposed to be an extreme anti-mason, doing masonic handshakes and signs? The answer is simple and obvious: because Hitler was a mason of course (and a jew). He was not what he seemed to be. He was in fact a jew put in power to allow Jewish leaders to create Israel and have a lot of jews going to it.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Of course, it could be fake photos, made by jews in order to be "debunked" one day or another and thus to ridicule the theory that Hitler was a jew. Jews like to do things like that (for example, the African DNA of Hitler). However, all those photos have been well known for decades. Thus, such a thing would be very improbable. There would be two versions of the photos. This would be easy to find. This manipulation would have been identified quickly.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<br />hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-17345399751340308332013-06-22T09:07:00.000-07:002013-06-22T09:09:13.188-07:00The strange Greco-Italian war decided by Mussolini<div style="text-align: justify;">
I have already talked about Greece in the previous article. We are going to see more details about this affair.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, the 28th of October 1940, Mussolini suddenly declared war on Greece. 560.000 Italians faced 300.000 Greeks. Then, not only Greeks weren't defeated, but they even counter-attacked. In December, they had been able to advance of nearly 50 km in the Albanian territory. The 9th of March, Mussolini launched a second offensive, which didn't work either. After one week and 12.000 soldiers killed, he decided to stop the offensive and to let Hitler resolve the problem. For days after, his army left Albania. Thus, Hitler was forced to intervene in order to avoid a serious defeat for his ally. Germany invaded Greece the 6th of April, and Greece lost the 28th of April.<br />
<br />
There are several logical problems with this affair.</div>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>It's not the strangest of all the discrepancies, but why did Mussolini attack Greece? The argument that Mussolini was jealous of Hitler is quite ridiculous. Maybe the one that he wanted to remake a Roman empire is a little bit believable. But the Greek government was a dictatorship. Metaxas was anticommunist. His ideas were close of those of Mussolini. He should have been an ally instead of an enemy. It's a little bit like if Mussolini had attacked Spain. </li>
<li>Why did Mussolini attack at this moment (October 28 1940)? The timing of the attack was bizarre. At this very moment, things didn't go very well in North Africa: the 150.000 soldiers of the 10th army weren't able to attack the 36.000 British soldiers. Ok, the attack hadn't already taken place. But the Generals of Mussolini were warning him that the armies of North Africa weren't ready for an attack. And as Mussolini didn't know what would happen in North Africa, he should have been cautious and wait before attacking Greece. He should have waited until the battle of North Africa was finished, and attack Greece after that. Autumn and winter were also not especially the best seasons to make an attack. It is said that it's because the season was inappropriate for an attack that Hitler didn't attack Greece right away.</li>
<li>How could they lose, and so quickly? They were vastly superior concerning the number of soldiers (there were 560.000 Italians against 300.000 Greeks, so, almost 2 against 1). And, as Italy was much bigger and richer than Greece (44 million people against 7), they were much better equipped than Greeks. According to Wikipedia, they had 163 tanks when Greece had only 20, 463 aircrafts (Greece 77). Thus, they shouldn't have lost so quickly.</li>
<li>What did England do there? When they began to send troops (the sending was finally decided the 22nd of February, and the first troops were sent the 6th of March 1941), they knew Germany was on the verge of participating to the invasion (they invaded Greece the 6th of April 1941). So, they were absolutely sure to lose. And, at the same time, they were almost sure to win in North Africa. So, why mobilize 58.000 soldiers in Greece where they were sure of losing instead of sending them in North Africa, where they were sure to win? British also took troops of North Africa to send them in Greece. This is why the attack against Italians in North Africa was stopped the 7th of February 1941. Germany began sending troops in North Africa the 11th of February (via Tripoli). But there were enough of them only at the beginning of March. So, during one month, England could have obliterated the Italian forces and pushed until Tripoli (in 15 days, between the 22nd of January and the 7th of February, they had progressed 400 km). It is also said that sending British troops in Greece was not accepted by Greek government at the beginning because there was a high risk that it would lead Hitler to attack Greece. And indeed, the intervention of England in Greece was one of the reasons he did it.</li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
When you understand that Hitler was a Jewish shill and that World War II was staged, all those discrepancies can be explained.<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
War in Greece was once again staged. It had three goals:<br />
<br />
1) to cause a delay concerning the war against Russia. Delay which would explain partially why Hitler didn't win in 1941.<br />
<br />
2) to justify that British troops were stopped when they were on the verge of throwing Italian forces out of North Africa.<br />
<br />
3) to give another reason to explain why Hitler still didn't try to send troops in North Africa (the explanation was he was too busy preparing and managing the assault against Greece, and after that, Russia)<br />
<br />
With this in mind, you can understand the reason of the several discrepancies.<br />
<br />
Mussolini didn't attack Greece because he was jealous of Hitler, or because he wanted to make a new Roman Empire. He was a jew as Hitler, and of course a part of the plan of Jewish leaders. As Hitler, he wasn't for real. So, if he attacked Greece, this because of the three goals listed before.<br />
<br />
He did it at this moment (28th of October 1940) because in the Jewish leaders plan, Italy had to be severely defeated in North Africa in December. Thus, if the war against Greece had begun in January 1941, it would have been much more difficult to justify. People would have wondered why Mussolini had started this war when his troops were being crushed by British forces in North Africa. So, even if the war in North Africa did not go well, he had to launch the attack against Greece, otherwise, the discrepancy of attacking it would have been much bigger. There was already incoherence, since there was already a second front where things were not happening very well, but if he hadn't attacked at this moment, the incoherence would have been huge.<br />
<br />
Even if it leaded to a very fishy event, Mussolini had to lose (or at least to be stopped) against Greek armies because otherwise Germany wouldn't have got any reason to intervene. Thus, Germany wouldn't have been late regarding operation Barbarossa. England also wouldn't have got enough time to send troops in Greece. Thus, it would have been more difficult to explain why they didn't expelled Italian armies from North Africa.<br />
<br />
Thus, if England sent troops in Greece, whereas they were sure to lose against Germans forces and sure to win in North Africa, it's because they precisely had to stop winning in North Africa. If they hadn't stopped their attack because they had to send troops from North Africa to Greece, they would have won in North Africa. And if they had sent the 58.000 soldiers stationed in Greece in North Africa, they would have won even more easily.<br />
<br />
And this wasn't at all in the plan of Jewish leaders, because otherwise, Hitler would have been obliged to postpone his attack against Russia in order to get rid of the British threat in North Africa. Then, he would have got all the time needed to beat the British forces (and it would have taken time to be able to possess North Africa again). So, not only North Africa would have been lost, but the Mediterranean Sea also. May be England. The whole war would have lasted much more time. And finally, Hitler could have been able to attack Russia at the right time (I mean, without being late), with new weapons (tanks), with a better preparation, without having to fight on other fronts, and with unlimited supplies of oil. Then the defeat against Russia would have been very difficult to explain.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, you could answer: "What if Germany had sent troops sooner in North Africa"? Then the invasion of Greece wouldn't have been necessary for England, since the danger of having Italian forces expelled from North Africa wouldn't have been a problem anymore. The problem is all happened very quickly in North Africa between Italy and England. The battle lasted between the 8th of December 1940 and the 7th of February, only two months. And Germany needed a little bit of time to send troops in North Africa: at least one month. Thus, Hitler couldn't send his troops at the beginning of January, since it would have meant that he knew at the beginning of December that Italy would lose the battle, which was impossible. Thus, he could only begin to send them at the beginning of February, because in January, he knew that Italy would probably lose. But, it had to take at least two months to have enough troops to be able to attack. Thus, the problem of having Italian forces being expelled from North Africa before the coming of enough German troops remained. And it could be resolved only by sending enough British soldiers from North Africa to Greece, which would allow justifying the stop of the attack.<br />
<br />
There was another reason for sending British troops in Greece. As we have seen it at the beginning of the text, the presence of 58.000 British soldiers pushed Hitler to invade Greece. Probably that without this, the German invasion would have seemed a little bit strange. Hitler could have use diplomacy to make Italy and Greece have an arrangement. In fact, this is what happened at the beginning. And even without an arrangement, there were no huge risks of Greece trying to push farer than Albania and invade Italy. So, Greece was not really a threat for Germany, and neither for Italy. Thus, without the British troops, no war from Hitler on Greece.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is something else which would have made Hitler to have no reason of invading Greece. In fact, Hitler didn't plan to use Italian troops during the invasion of Russia. Mussolini decided to send soldiers once he knew about Barbarossa. But Hitler informed him about the operation just one day before it. Obviously, Italy wasn't a part of this operation. Italy could have continued its war against Greece, it would have made no difference for Hitler regarding his own war against Russia. So, without the presence of British troops in Greece (and without Churchill trying to make alliances with some Balkan countries), Hitler would have got no reason to invade Greece. He could have said: "well, continue your stupid war against Greece, I am going to invade Russia with my other allies". Whereas, with British troops present in Greece, it was completely different. Hitler had to invade Greece in order to get rid of this threat.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
PS: Metaxas, the Greek dictator, was also strange. This guy was supposed to have more or less the same ideas than Mussolini or Franco. He supposedly was a Germanophile. Germany was Greece's largest trading partner. Thus, he should have been on the side of the Axis. But no, he was more on the side of England; he had offered the British military bases on Crete island as early as 1939; and to cap it, he had summoned the Greek shipowners to put their ships at the disposal of the British Government. Historians say it's because he feared an Italian invasion. But, then, an alliance with the Axis would have prevented this threat from happening. It would have been clearly the best way of being safe. Whereas being friendly with Britain and having British troops on his ground was the best way of being invaded by Italy or Germany. So, nothing makes sense. But if he was a jew, his behavior is not strange anymore. He couldn't make an alliance with the Axis, because, otherwise, the Greco-Italian war couldn't have happened. And Jewish leaders wanted it to happen.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We can also think that his death (January 29 1941, just 3 months after the beginning of the war) was staged or was phony. With Metaxas the Germanophile dictator dead, there couldn't be any diplomatic issue to the Greco-Italian war.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But why a Germanophile dictator? Why didn't Jewish leaders use a democratic state? It would have been easier to justify the invasion. But, with Metaxas being a Germanophile dictator, it was easier to justify that Mussolini didn't warn Hitler he would soon invade Greece; and thus, invaded it alone. If Mussolini had warned Hitler of what he was going to do, the latter would have persuaded him to not do it. With a democracy, there would have been no reason to keep Hitler out of the process (or at least, much less reasons). And Hitler would even have helped Mussolini until the beginning. Thus Greece would have been defeated long before the end of April 1941. Of course, it wasn't impossible to have the same scenario (Mussolini attacking without warning Hitler) with a democracy; but it was easier with a dictatorship.</div>
<br />hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-44325786575943171672013-06-17T14:12:00.000-07:002013-06-17T14:14:18.197-07:00Why didn't Hitler attack British forces in North Africa in 1940?<div style="text-align: justify;">
Another discrepancy is about the Battle of North Africa. In August 1940, the Battle of France was over. England had lost a lot of his heavy armament. They were under the attack of the Luftwaffe. They were under the threat of being invaded. In this situation, they couldn't send troops to North Africa.<br />
<br />
At this time, there were only 36.000 British soldiers in North Africa, with 250 airplanes.<br />
<br />
So, Hitler had a free hand to be able to defeat them and to get the oil of the Middle East. And oil of the Middle East was very important for Hitler. Officially, this is why he attacked the Russians in the south in 1941, instead of attacking Moscow, and thus, lost the war against Russia.<br />
<br />
Hitler knew that British wouldn't be able to send reinforcements. And during the following 10 months, his armies wouldn't do anything. So, in August 1940, the moment was perfect to send troops in North Africa and beat the British armies. He didn't have to send tons of soldiers; just 100.000 would have been enough.<br />
<br />
But no, Hitler didn't do anything until the beginning of 1941 (of course, it was already almost too late). And he sent only few forces. Thus it wasn't enough to make the decision (he did something only because Italians had big problems against English forces).<br />
<br />
Once again, if you think that Hitler was for real, you don't understand. Ok, there are the arguments that Hitler relied on Italian forces at the beginning, or that he was concentrated on invading England, and then on invading Russia.<br />
<br />
But Italian Forces had proved to be inefficient. The battle against English forces of North Africa was constantly delayed. And even for Italian generals themselves, it was obvious that this offensive was doomed to failure. They didn't have enough heavy tanks, enough anti-tank material, enough trucks to transport troops, etc... And Italians had proved to be quite inefficient during the Battle of France. So, Hitler had to know this, obviously. Thus, as the objective was very important, he should have wanted to help the Italians; for example by giving them material and some troops (let's say, at least 50.000 soldiers), in order to have a quick result.<br />
<br />
Ok, he was concentrated on England, and after that, on Russia. But, not even one year before, he was not so concentrated on the Battle of France that he forgot to invade Denmark or Norway. Also, it didn't have to distract him very much. He just had to ask one of his generals to plan the attack. And it is said by historians that in fact, he didn't take the invasion of England too seriously. So, in August, Germans should have been able to plan and organize an attack in North Africa.<br />
<br />
All those excuses sound clearly phony. But when you know that Hitler was a jew working for more powerful Jewish leaders, you can understand what happened. Hitler had no intention at all to vanquish British forces in North Africa. For Jewish leaders, it would have been very problematic.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>If Hitler and Mussolini had won in 1940 or at the beginning of 1941, then all North Africa would have belonged to them. They also could have blocked the strait of Gibraltar. Thus no more exhausting war in North Africa, no invasion of Sicily; no invasion of Italy; no need to have tons of soldiers and material stationed in the south of Europe in order to prevent an invasion; the possibility for Germans to get the oil of the Middle East; thus, no necessity to attack in the Caucasus instead of Moscow.<br />
<br />
The landing in Sicily and in Italy, and the threat of a landing in the south of France allowed to partly explain why Hitler lost against Russia. Otherwise, it would have been more difficult to explain. With those landings, Hitler had to take precious troops from the Russian front, which participated to his final defeat. The error of trying to get the oil of Caucasus was another explanation of the defeat of Hitler against Russian. Without it, it would also have been more difficult to explain why Hitler lost against Russians. Thus, with the possession of North Africa, losing the war against Russia would have seemed much fishier. And Jewish leaders, who had staged all the war, didn't want to have big discrepancies (and of course, a victory of Hitler against Russians was out of the question). So, North Africa had to still be controlled by Allied forces. No way could Hitler win there.<br />
<br />
That's the general idea. But studying closer how things happened brings us interesting details and new discrepancies.<br />
<br />
What happened is that since June 1940, British forces under the command of O'Connor had made small attacks against Italian forces. Thus, Mussolini had been preparing an attack against them. It had to take place near the 15th of July, and be conducted by marshal Italo Balbo. There were already a lot of Italian troops in North Africa (something like 250.000 soldiers). So, an attack could be made quickly. But things took a long time. Balbo was aware that the equipment of Italian forces was very insufficient. He was awaiting better armament and equipment. Then, Balbo died. He was killed by friendly fire when his plane was shot down over Tobruk by Italian anti-aircraft guns. Thus the attack was delayed until September. At this time, the Italian army still almost didn't have the equipment demanded by Balbo. But Mussolini ordered to launch the attack right now.<br />
<br />
With our revisionist way of considering things, we can think that in fact, this slowness was voluntary. Jewish leaders wanted Italian commandment to lose time in order to delay the intervention of German forces as much as possible. The death of Balbo was probably not an accident (or maybe was faked). It allowed losing a little more time. And once again, there is a discrepancy about the behavior of Hitler. As the goal was very important, he should have wanted to help Italians by giving them at least dozens of medium tanks, airplanes, some anti-tank weapons and other material. It would have been nothing for him, but would have helped a lot the Italian army. But of course, when you know he was in fact a Jewish shill, and that winning this battle was out of the question for Jewish leaders, it isn't a discrepancy anymore.<br />
<br />
The first real operation began on September 9 1940, and lasted until the 16th of September (Italian troops entered Egypt). Then 150.000 Italians attacked 36.000 British soldiers. But there was almost no battle. British troops just retreated of 80 km on better defensive lines. After that, all operations were delayed until the beginning of December (the 8), that is, three months. Once again, the Axis had lost a lot of time. Of course, here also, it was made on purpose. And of course, during all this time, Hitler still didn't help Italians by giving them anti-tank weapons and other material. It is also said that the position of the Italian army was worse after the advance of 80 km than before. Thus, maybe this advance was planned by Jewish leaders in order to weaken the Italian forces.<br />
<br />
In December, you would think that after those 3 months, Italian forces had got a better armament and material at least from the Italian army itself, and thus were on the verge of attacking the English forces. But, no, to the contrary, the 8th of December 1940, it's the British army which, with only 36.000 soldiers, attacked the 150.000 Italian soldiers, who were still lacking appropriate weapons and material. And not only they attacked, but it was a disaster for the Italian forces. In two months (until the 7th of February), they lost 130.000 soldiers (most were made prisoners), 1.300 pieces of artillery (on 1.600 they had at the beginning), and 400 tanks (on 600). And they were forced to retreat on 800 km. British forces could have thrown them out of North Africa. But the attacked was stopped because the British government forced them to send troops in Greece.<br />
<br />
Once again, you have something strange here. During all the war, British weren't very known to attack without having an important superiority. They were quite cautious. But here, they were suddenly super audacious, almost disciples of Alexander the Great. They had only 36.000 soldiers, few tanks. But they didn't hesitate to launch an attack against the Italian forces. Ok, they could think that without heavy armament, Italians were beatable. But still.<br />
<br />
If you have in mind that the war was staged, you can think that Jewish leaders were forced to make Italians retreat on 800 km. They had to produce movement on the front and to create quite a disaster for Italian armies. If the front had stayed immobile, thus, there would have been no reason for Hitler to intervene. Even if the front had finally been stabilized by Italians, Hitler would have had a reason to stay out of this affair. Same thing if the Italian forces had been almost intact. If they had lost only 20.000 or 30.000 men, Hitler could have say that things were not so bad. But with tons of losses, a retreat of 800 km, and a high probability of being expelled from North Africa, it was not the same thing.<br />
<br />
Without this retreat, the front would also have been too close from Egypt (or in Egypt). Thus, when Germany would have sent troops, Jewish leaders couldn't have made them win (temporary). Otherwise, they would have been too advanced in Egypt of even in the Middle East.<br />
<br />
It's true that Hitler sent only 13.000 soldiers at the beginning. So, you can think that, after all, Jewish leaders could have made the front to stay immobile. They would have justified this by the fact that there weren't enough German troops. But, once again, if the front hadn't moved why send German forces? And if the front hadn't move, then, there still would have been the 150.000 Italian soldiers. With the reinforcement of German soldiers and equipment, it would have been difficult to explain how they weren't able to beat the British forces. So, British had to be able to destroy almost entirely the Italian army and to make them retreat on 800 km. Then, when the Germans would come, with only 13.000 soldiers, it would be possible to make them win at the beginning, but not definitively because of a lack of soldiers and equipment. But the Germans should not send 40.000 or 50.000 soldiers at first. Otherwise, they would have won quickly.<br />
<br />
The other interesting things are: 1) Italians weren't expelled from North Africa; 2) the reason why British didn't do it.<br />
<br />
They weren't expelled because the British government sent a part of the British army of North Africa to Greece.<br />
<br />
So, British forces were about to throw the Italian forces out of North Africa. Nothing could have prevented them from doing it. And it was a very important victory, because it would have been difficult for the Axis troops to come back. Thus, North Africa could have become a base for the invasion of Sicily or Italy much sooner than what happened historically. But, suddenly, they stopped. And why did they stop? Because they wanted to send troops into Greece.<br />
<br />
The problem is that it was completely stupid. They could send only little forces in Greece (only 58.000 soldiers; soldiers who would have been much more useful in North Africa). And they knew that very soon, Germans would send his armies in Greece. So, this help was useless. And indeed, British forces were forced to retreat almost without fighting.<br />
<br />
So, we can think that in fact, the war in Greece was once again staged. It had three goals:<br />
<br />
1) to cause a delay concerning the war against Russia. Delay which would explain partially that Hitler didn't win in 1941.<br />
<br />
2) to justify that British troops were stopped when they were on the verge of throwing Italian forces out of North Africa.<br />
<br />
3) to give another reason to explain why Hitler still didn't try to send troops in North Africa (the explanation was he was too busy preparing and managing the assault against Greece, and after that, Russia).<br />
<br />
If the British troops hadn't been stopped by their hierarchy when they were about to expel Italians from North Africa, then they would have controlled North Africa. And then, they would have become an important threat for Germany. Thus, Hitler would have probably delayed the invasion of Russia in order to get rid of this threat. He would also have sent a lot of troops in order to defeat them once and for all. And he would have very probably tried to control the strait of Gibraltar, with or without the authorization of Franco.<br />
<br />
So, in the plan of Jewish leaders, British forces had to be stopped in their victory against Italians. And they had to still have just a little amount of soldiers in North Africa in order to keep being just a little threat for Hitler. Thus this threat wouldn't require sending many German troops in order to be controlled. It had to last until the invasion of Russia from Germany. Then, British would be able to send much more troops and Germany would do the same. This would enable to explain partly the defeat of Hitler against Russians.<br />
<br />
So, Hitler sent only 13.000 soldiers between March and June 1941. In front of them, there were 20.000 British soldiers. The 22nd of June 1941, Hitler declared war on Russia. Then, the period of time were the lack of a strong German intervention in North Africa was very fishy was finished. After June 22, Jewish leaders were able to explain why, each time, Hitler was not sending enough troops to be able to destroy definitively the British forces. They could say it was because of the war against Russia. The period of the big discrepancy about the behavior of Hitler regarding North Africa was over.<br />
<br />
And the fact that Hitler sent only 13.000 soldiers between March and June 1941 was still a big discrepancy. He knew that once he would be fighting against Russians, he wouldn't be able to send enough troops against British, and, to the contrary, that the British high command would be able to send much more troops to North Africa (since they wouldn't have the threat of an invasion anymore). So, he knew that there was a high risk of losing North Africa. And he was conscious of what it meant. With almost all his forces in Russia, he would then be very weak in other parts of Europe. He already had to protect France. So, the risk of an invasion in the South of Europe would become high.<br />
<br />
And in March, it was a very good occasion to defeat the British, since these were busy in Greece, and there were only 20.000 British soldiers remaining in North Africa.<br />
<br />
But, no, once again, he didn't do anything which would enable him to get rid of the British in North Africa.<br />
<br />
<br />
So, at the beginning, we had already this big discrepancy about Hitler not attacking (or with very few forces) between July 1940 and March 1941, and not helping the Italians. But by exploring details of this affair, we have three other discrepancies: 1) The fact that British, who were known to be very cautious, attacked the Italian army with five time less soldiers. 2) The fact that British stopped their attack while they were crushing the Italians. 2) The fact that British sent 58.000 soldiers in Greece whereas they were almost sure to be defeated with Greek armies.<br />
<br />
But when you know that the war was staged by Jewish leaders, and why, you can explain those discrepancies easily.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-51510953631410436362013-06-14T07:18:00.000-07:002013-12-01T22:51:28.890-08:00The strange alliance between Germany and Japan<div style="text-align: justify;">
The way of considering things presented in the previous article (about why the war between the USA and Germany was declared only in 1941) explains also the strange alliance between Germany and Japan.<br />
<br />
As we have seen it before, to justify all those years of inaction from the USA, Jewish leaders had to give a quite good explanation. The one they found was that America was dominated by isolationists. In December 1941, it was then quite difficult to say that suddenly, they weren't isolationists anymore. Thus, because they were supposed to still be isolationists, the declaration of war of December 1941 couldn't come from them. It had to come from Germany.<br />
<br />
This way, the USA could enter the war without creating a discrepancy. But, of course, Germany had everything to lose in a war with the USA, since it was already fighting Russia and England. There would have been no reason at all for Germany to suddenly declare war on the USA at the fall of 1941.<br />
<br />
This is why the Japanese alliance was required. With it, Germany had a reason to declare war on the USA. Even if the reason seemed very phony, there was at least a reason. Once this reason created, Jewish Medias just had to sell the idea that Hitler was a man of honor and thus, felt obligated to declare war on the USA.<br />
<br />
With Japan, Jewish leaders had a country totally independent from Europe; a country which then could declare war on the USA at any desired time, something very useful and convenient since the moment the war between Germany and the USA had to be declared was quite strange (if Japan hadn't been involved).<br />
<br />
This is why there was this very strange alliance between Japan and Germany (September 27 1940). It had nothing to do with the official story; that is, Hitler had Japan in great esteem and thought Japanese were kind of Germanic Asians. It also had nothing to do with the hope that Japan would participate to the war against Russia.<br />
<br />
Of course, it means that the Japanese government was already controlled by jews. Otherwise, Jewish leaders wouldn't have relied on it for this agenda which needed to be very precise.<br />
<br />
PS: Indeed, this alliance was very strange. What did Hitler, who thought that German and Nordic races were the only ones which worthed something, do with Asians?<br />
<br />
Officially, from the point of view of Germans, this alliance was concluded because of USSR. Hitler hoped that Japan would help him against Russia (that is, would declare war to Russia). The problem is: in September 1940, it was clear that Japan wouldn't help Germany against Russia. First, it was very dubious that they could do it, since they were already very busy with China, Southern Asia, India, etc… And they most probably didn't want it. Why would Japan attack Russia? They didn't have any profits to make in this affair. The only lands they could gain were of very low interest. And for those poor lands, they would have to make a war against a very powerful adversary. China, Southern Asia presented much more interests for them. It was obvious. So, Hitler didn't have any help against Russia to hope for. And he couldn't ignore it.<br />
<br />
In fact, the alliance with Japan was extremely dangerous, since, in September 1940, it seemed more and more likely that they would finally make war against the USA; something which was totally against the interests of Germany.<br />
<br />
So, why an alliance? Why not just a cordial relationship?<br />
<br />
Ok, maybe why not an alliance? But, then, not a serious one. Just an alliance on paper. Not an alliance leading to declare war on the USA. But it was not a superficial alliance. It was a very serious one (at least in the mind of Hitler), since it leaded Germany to declare war on the USA.<br />
<br />
So, this alliance was very strange. But when you understand that the war was staged, you understand why this alliance took place. It was concluded only to allow the USA to enter the war against Germany without having to do the first step.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-50216361836251254602013-06-14T07:07:00.000-07:002013-06-14T07:09:23.006-07:00Why was the war between the USA and Germany declared only in 1941?<div style="text-align: justify;">
When you study the Battle of France, Dunkirk, the Battle of North Africa, etc, with a revisionist eye (that is, knowing that Hitler was a Zionist jew), you quickly ask yourself why the USA didn't declared war on Germany in 1939 or 1940. And you also ask yourself why it was Germany which declared war against America and not the contrary. And as quickly, you understand why.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Indeed, the fact that America didn't declared war on Germany sooner is extremely fishy. As England, France and all European countries, the USA had been dominated by the jews since an long time. In 1939, the president was Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a jew. Roosevelt is a derivative of the Jewish name Rosenfeld, and Delano is also a Jewish name.<br />
<br />
The infamous banknote of one dollar, the one with the pyramid and the all seeing eye, has been created in 1933, after the election of Roosevelt. The Jewish leaders sent then an important signal toward Gentiles. It meant "we are now powerful enough to show you clearly that we are the masters and you are the cattle". So, things were clear regarding the nature of the government of the USA.<br />
<br />
So, America should have been the one which would have declared war on Germany, not the contrary. And America would have declared it as soon as England and France had declared war on Germany, that is, in 1939. And long before that, America should have pushed other Jewish dominated states of Europe (France, England, etc…) to make war on Germany.<br />
<br />
And if they hadn't done it in 1939, they would have done it in 1940, after Dunkirk; because they would have feared an invasion of England. So, by declaring war on Germany, they would have probably prevented an invasion of it. Hitler would have been too afraid of the immense power of America to try to invade England.<br />
<br />
They should have declared it also not long after June 1941, because Germany was then fighting Russians. If Germany had won against Russia, it would have been a catastrophe for the USA and of course, for the Jewish power.<br />
<br />
But, no, they never declared war on Germany. It's Germany which declared war on the USA in December 1941, after the declaration of war from Japan to America.<br />
<br />
So, the Jewish power was severely challenged by a supposed Anti-Semite, and they did nothing? Absolutely incredible. Super fishy.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>The very fact that Germany declared war on the USA is also ultra fishy. Germany was fighting against USSR (Russia). England was not defeated yet. The Battle of North Africa wasn't won either. Germany hadn't been able to close the Mediterranean Sea at Gibraltar. Declaring war on the extremely powerful USA was completely crazy.<br />
<br />
Officially Hitler did that because of his alliance with Japan. But, the treaty between Germany and Japan didn't force Germany to declare war on the USA. And, as someone else has said it, Japan didn't declared war on Russia when Germany did. So, why declare war on the USA? Germany didn't owe anything to Japan.<br />
<br />
So, the declaration of war from Germany on the USA is another enormous discrepancy from Hitler.<br />
<br />
<br />
But when you understand that Hitler was a jew and that wwII was staged, you understand quickly why all those events happened this way.<br />
<br />
The USA couldn't declare war on Germany in 1939, because then, if Hitler had won the Battle of France, it would have seemed quite fishy. The Allied forces would have been much more powerful than the German ones. And for Jewish leaders, Hitler had to win the Battle of France.<br />
<br />
The second reason why they couldn't declare war in 1939 is also valid for 1940 (after June). If they had done it, then, Hitler would have faced very powerful forces in England and in North Africa. Then, he would have been forced to postpone the war against Russia (supposing that they would have won the Battle of France of course), because this first front would have been much too powerful to allow Hitler to open a second one. He would have been forced to win against the USA/England alliance before making war against Russia. Thus, either Germany would have won against the Allied forces, or it would have lost.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>In the first case, war against Russia would have been postponed for a long time. And as the USA were far away, it would have been impossible for Germany to win against them. So, the war would have last forever. But if at least England had been conquered, then, Germany would have had a free hand to invade Russia. And without England to make second front, the defeat of Germany against Russia would have been difficult to explain. And if Russia had won, nearly all Europe would have been invaded by Stalin.</li>
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>In the second case, the invasion of Russia would never have taken place. And it would have been quite difficult to explain how Germany was defeated whit all its forces at disposal (supposing, of course, that he would have been defeated only by the English and American forces).</li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It would also have been even more difficult to explain why Hitler didn't invade Spain in order to get the strait of Gibraltar (or didn't force Franco to give German forces a right of passage on the Spanish territory).<br />
<br />
So, they could declare war on Germany only after June 1941, once Hitler had already begun the invasion of Russia. Fall of 1941 was the good moment. It was because: 1) the invasion was necessary to justify after the victory of Russia that USSR would take over Eastern and Central Europe. 2) With Hitler having invaded Russia and his army killing millions of Russians, Hitler appeared much more as the bad guy than with the former wars, which had leaded to a little amount of deaths comparatively. 3) As Hitler was occupied by the war against Russia, Jewish leaders could justify that Hitler didn't tried to control the strait of Gibraltar and also didn't win the battle of North Africa. 4) With English and American forces still controlling the Mediterranean Sea, they could force Hitler to engage troops against them. It helped in explaining the defeat against Russians. 5) During the time needed to prepare the D-day, Hitler could gather the jews of Europe into camps. And there was enough time to give the Holocaust lie a credibility (one or two years would have seemed fishy. With the story happening on for or five years, it was more credible).<br />
<br />
You can wonder why the USA didn't declare war in June 1941, just when Germany attacked Russia.<br />
<br />
The first reason is that it was difficult to justify it, regarding the isolationist policy they had adopted until then. They didn't declare war when Germany invaded Poland, Norway, then France, when England was on the verge of being possibly invaded, when Germany began the battle of North Africa, when they invaded Greece, and finally, when most of Europe was more or less under the power the Axis (and, at least, under the power of dictators). So, why suddenly declare war on Germany? Of course, they could have used the argument that the invasion of Russia was the final straw, and that Hitler could become too powerful. But why wouldn't have it been the final straw during the previous steps? Thus, Germany had to be the one declaring war against the USA, not the contrary.<br />
<br />
And how justify a war against Hitler because he was too powerful, when just few years later, they wouldn't seem to see any problem with USSR taking half of Europe?<br />
<br />
The second reason was probably that Jewish leaders wanted to reorganize Asia. So, they decided to kill two birds with one stone and to use Japan to allow the war between Germany and the USA, in addition of making war in Asia. So as Japan had to be the initiator of the war with the USA, and thus as it had to be Germany which would then declare war on the USA, the USA couldn't declare war on Germany. And of course, Jewish leaders couldn't make Pearl Harbor happen just at the same time than the war between Germany and Russia. It would have been too fishy. They had to postpone a little bit the event in order to avoid a coincidence which would be too convenient.<br />
<br />
Thus, in December 1941, the USA still couldn't declare war on Germany. Once again, it would have been too inconsistent with their former isolationist policy. And Jewish leaders wanted to reorganize Asia. So, the declaration of war had to come initially from Japan, Followed by the one from Germany.<br />
<br />
War couldn't be declared in 1942 or in 1943, or after, because then, without the help of the USA, England should have been defeated in North Africa (or else, it would have seemed strange). And for the D-day of June 1944, it would have seemed too short. People would have wondered how America could have been so quickly operational for the D-day (the official timing was already quite extraordinary). Or else, the D-day would have been postponed. But Jewish leaders wanted the war to last a short amount of time. And if the D-day had been postponed, the war against Russia would have lasted longer, in order to finally have the same situation there was at the end of wwII, that is, Europe being separated in two blocks. But then, it would have been much more difficult to explain why the situation didn't evolve in one direction or another during all those years on the Russian front.<br />
<br />
This is why the war had to be declared in 1941, not before, not after. And it had to be declared by Germany on the USA, and not the contrary.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-11953835327723736312013-06-11T07:42:00.000-07:002015-08-10T04:34:44.979-07:00Hitler and Dunkirk: it was not a mistake<div style="text-align: justify;">
The case of Dunkirk is one of those which show the most clearly that Hitler was a jew working for Jewish leaders.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
Even when I still believed Hitler was for real, I couldn't understand his reaction about Dunkirk. It was a big logical hole in the wwII story. And the official explanation about Hitler wanting to be friend with England didn't hold one second.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
For those who don't know, France and England declared war to Germany the 3rd of September 1939, after the invasion of Poland by Hitler's armies. But the real war between France/England and Germany began only May 10 1940, when Hitler invaded France and Belgium.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
At the end of May, the situation was the following:</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b1vpnSXPhbM/UbcrcZ_HYYI/AAAAAAAAAA4/lPmOzL0Kw6M/s1600/Dunkirk_battle_1940_map.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b1vpnSXPhbM/UbcrcZ_HYYI/AAAAAAAAAA4/lPmOzL0Kw6M/s320/Dunkirk_battle_1940_map.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In May 21, 230.000 British soldiers and around 180.000 French soldiers were separated from the rest of the Allied army (in the red zone of the map). The 26, they began to retreat toward Dunkirk. The 28, the pocket of resistance was now only 37 km long (Dunkirk to Nieuport) and 9km large at best (Beaches to the space before Bergues). There were 800.000 German soldiers against the 410.000 Allied soldiers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
There were two moments in which the decisions of Hitler allowed Allied forces to flee: between the 24 and the 26, and between the 28 and the 4.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<a name='more'></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- Between the 24th and the 26th of May</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On the map, something is confusing. It is said that the front was on the Aa canal the 26th of May. But what is not clear is if the front was there before the 26 or if it was there just the 26. In fact, with Liddell Hart's book "History of the Second World War" (1970), we learn that it's the first case. The front was there between the 23 and the 26. In fact, the 23, German troops were already on the other side of the Aa canal. Many bridges hadn't been dynamited. Thus, Germans were able to cross the canal. Between Graveline and Saint-Omer (30 km), there was only one British battalion (that is, between 300 and 1200 soldiers). They had almost no antitank weapons (there were a lot of German tanks on this part of the front). And the line between Graveline and 10 km after Bethune (75 km) was not better defended. As Germans had the air superiority and the land was very flat, with just fields, Allied forces couldn't hide. So, German generals and Hitler knew that there was nearly nobody to defend this zone. Allied troops hadn't already retreated in Dunkirk and on the beaches. Nothing could prevent Germans to invade the zone and to block the road toward Dunkirk.<br />
<br />
If they had done it, Allied forces would have been unable to escape by the sea. But the 24, Hitler ordered the German forces to stop right there. As they were at only 15 km of Dunkirk, chiefs of panzers bombarded their superiors with questions. But they were answered it was a direct order from the Fuhrer. So, during 3 days, the German troops did nothing. And the Allied forces used this time to flee toward Dunkirk. The 26, Germans finally move toward Dunkirk, but it was too late. Allies had already fled.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- Between the 28th of May and the 4th of June</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The 27, the evacuation of British troops began. But, before the 29, only 25.000 soldiers had been evacuated.<br />
<br />
So, the 26, it was totally clear that the British army was going to be evacuated by sea, and thus, that they were completely defeated. They were now in a very thin space. They had lost. It was over.<br />
<br />
Between May 28 and June 4, Hitler could prevent them from escaping by boats. He had several tools to do that.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- Canons</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
First of all, German forces could have used their canons in order to destroy a lot of boats and the jetty (by which 2/3 of the soldiers were able to flee), and to kill lots of soldiers who were without any protection on the beaches and in the port of Dunkirk.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
During World War II, anti-personnel artillery munition called shrapnel (a shell full of marbles, exploding in the air, and awfully efficient against troops exposed on a flat land) had been replaced by high explosive shells (it was still used by aircrafts though). This one had an even more awful result because the fragments were bigger and were sent farer. So, if Hitler had wanted to, he could have made a massacre by sending shrapnels on the beaches and on the port of Dunkirk. Of course, some could say that Hitler didn't want to kill so many men (because he was a noble man, or because he wanted to keep a good relationship with England). But then, why use his aircrafts to machine-gun the troops which were on the beaches? Why sink all those boats which had many men inside them (5000 soldiers perished in the boats)? And he could have done that just on the beaches and the port, in order to forbid the evacuation, but give them the possibility of going to the inner land.</div>
<br />
During the battle of Verdun (World War I), there were 1 million shells used each day. Imagine such a quantity of shells used on the 400.000 unprotected soldiers of Dunkirk.<br />
<br />
It is said that half of Dunkirk was destroyed. But, in fact, only 6.000 men were killed on the land (plus 5000 on the sea. So, a total of 11.000 men). With 410.000 men in the small town of Dunkirk and on the beaches, without any protection, you would expect to have at least 100.000 dead. But no, only 6.000.<br />
<br />
Some images show that canons almost weren't use at all on the beaches:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wPak_ObrrV0/UbctrKnEtrI/AAAAAAAAABI/vzrrRVHQrSo/s1600/allied_troops_beach_dunkirk_1940.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="181" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wPak_ObrrV0/UbctrKnEtrI/AAAAAAAAABI/vzrrRVHQrSo/s320/allied_troops_beach_dunkirk_1940.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-kiAnw8WCPMQ/UbcuNQ-1YoI/AAAAAAAAABQ/osg57MGmiDs/s1600/allied_soldiers_dunkirk_beach_1940.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="234" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-kiAnw8WCPMQ/UbcuNQ-1YoI/AAAAAAAAABQ/osg57MGmiDs/s320/allied_soldiers_dunkirk_beach_1940.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZLOfezjSXok/UbcuppsKI3I/AAAAAAAAABY/HQuNpiQ9pkI/s1600/allied_soldiers_dunkirk_beach_1940_2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="197" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZLOfezjSXok/UbcuppsKI3I/AAAAAAAAABY/HQuNpiQ9pkI/s320/allied_soldiers_dunkirk_beach_1940_2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Where are the dead soldiers? Where are the holes from explosions? And if there were so many shells sent on the beach, why are the soldiers standing up? They should be lying on the ground, in order to avoid the numerous explosions. They didn't because there were nearly no explosions.</div>
<br />
Churchill said that as shells ended up in the sand, many of them didn't exploded. But Germans weren't stupid. They knew that. So, they would have use shells with retardant, not just shells which explode at the impact.<br />
<br />
Others photos are also interesting:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8u6nf1tP1aE/Ubcvsep2NUI/AAAAAAAAABk/_4wFgHy9pJM/s1600/1940_dunkirk_troops_happy_faces.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="318" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8u6nf1tP1aE/Ubcvsep2NUI/AAAAAAAAABk/_4wFgHy9pJM/s320/1940_dunkirk_troops_happy_faces.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gb-KareTDfU/UbcwRGOZQRI/AAAAAAAAABs/HuURjnezThY/s1600/dunkirk_1940_soldiers_in_boats.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="223" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gb-KareTDfU/UbcwRGOZQRI/AAAAAAAAABs/HuURjnezThY/s320/dunkirk_1940_soldiers_in_boats.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lInmshBz0pE/UbcwvvGeu4I/AAAAAAAAAB0/5JoZTcrj4Bg/s1600/dunkirk_soldiers_evacuation_1940.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lInmshBz0pE/UbcwvvGeu4I/AAAAAAAAAB0/5JoZTcrj4Bg/s320/dunkirk_soldiers_evacuation_1940.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Is this faces of men who have just escaped an apocalypse of bombs on the beaches or in the port, or the faces of men who escaped quietly? They don't seem to be very stressed or traumatized.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- Aircrafts</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
About the aircrafts, there are several points to consider.<br />
<br />
<b>The air supremacy:</b> it is said that the Luftwaffe had the air superiority. But it is also said that on this very battle the Royal Air Force was able to be sometimes stronger than the Luftwaffe. It is very dubious that suddenly, the RAF was superior. Liddell Hart gives the reason why the RAF was able to more or less outperform the Luftwaffe (sometimes). In fact, the Luftwaffe sent only few aircrafts compared with what it could have done; once again because of a direct order from Hitler. What was planned was that the Luftwaffe would be completely in charge of preventing the Allied force from fleeing. But finally, because of this decision from Hitler, the Luftwaffe could not do much.<br />
<br />
<b>The weather:</b> it is said that during several days, the weather was not very good. Thus, German airplane could be used against Allied forces only the 27, the 29 and the 1st of June (Germans had the air supremacy), so, only 3 days on the 8 days.<br />
<br />
But, even the 29 and the 1st of June, tons of British soldiers were able to escape (47.000 and 64.000: two of the for best days, on a total of 9 days). So, even when the Luftwaffe was able to attack, it doesn't seem much was done. But as we have seen, Hitler ordered the Luftwaffe to use only a little part of his forces. This is why so many soldiers were able to escape during those days.<br />
<br />
However, this story about the changing weather seems dubious. The problem is it is said that the sea was perfectly calm during those 8 days. Historians say it explains a part of the success of the operation Dynamo. So, how could the sea be so calm when besides, the weather was changing so often?<br />
<br />
Some could say that the weather was not changing so much but was passing from a little bit cloudy to more cloudy. That would explain why there wasn't much wind. But there are photos of soldiers on the beach and on the jetty, and the weather seems very beautiful. For example, this one:</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-q8WL8Nv0sBg/UbcyAujyYEI/AAAAAAAAACE/MYdvvqF7dq8/s1600/dunkirk_beach_1940_soldiers_sunny_weather.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="245" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-q8WL8Nv0sBg/UbcyAujyYEI/AAAAAAAAACE/MYdvvqF7dq8/s320/dunkirk_beach_1940_soldiers_sunny_weather.PNG" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Thus, the weather was passing from sunny to cloudy, and this, in just one day. Then, how could there be so little wind and how could the sea be so calm? So, what is probable is that the weather was quite fine during most of the time, and the Luftwaffe could attack without problem. But the story about the weather has been modified in order to justify the fact that Hitler used the Luftwaffe so little; and then to avoid adding a fishy behavior to the other ones.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
Something else supports the idea that the weather was not so bad. It is generally added that the smoke from the fires in Dunkirk participated to the fact that the Luftwaffe could not attack. But the fires wouldn't have been able to prevent the airplanes from attacking the beaches, the jetty, and the boats. And there was no fires on the beaches (you don't see ones on the photos). So, why did they give this precision about the fire? This is because, as the liars were conscious that the weather was not so bad, they felt that they had to add the problem of the fire in order to give more consistency to the initial lie.<br />
<br />
And where the port is located, the town itself (where there are the houses and buildings) is quite far away. So, in the port, the smoke from the fire would have been too far to disturb the German airplanes.<br />
<br />
And as there was no rain, as the goal was well identified (and immobile), and as the Luftwaffe was not far from it, clouds should not have been a problem. They could have even allowed the Luftwaffe to hide in them before bombing Dunkirk and the beaches.<br />
<br />
And on this <a href="http://dkepaves.free.fr/download/chronologie.pdf" target="_blank">site</a>, there are reports of air attacks from the Luftwaffe on other days that the 27, the 29 and the 1. You find for example that the 28, the French Minesweeper Mimi Pierrot was sunk by the Luftwaffe. And at 12h30, the destroyer Brighton Belle touches a wreck during an attack form the Luftwaffe. The 30, the British malles (boats which allowed people to cross the channel during peacetime) Clan Mac Alister and Mona's Queen are sunk by the Luftwaffe, and the minesweeper Devonia is damaged. The 31, the Dutch boat Horst is damaged by the German airplanes. The 2, the French coaster Francois Tixier escapes a bombing from German airplanes. Two hospital boats, the Paris and the Worthing are attacked by the Luftwtaffe. The first one is sunk and the second is damaged. So, the 28, the 30, the 31, and the 2, the weather was not so bad and the German airplanes were able to fly.<br />
<br />
This is why Liddell Hart doesn't talk about problems of clouds or fires, or about the fact that miraculously the RAF was suddenly superior to the Luftwaffe, in order to explain the fact that the Luftwaffe didn't made much damages to the Allied forces. He knew that those explanations were phony. This is why he says clearly that in fact, it's Hitler who ordered the Luftwaffe to attack just a little bit: "<i>we have also the proof that the Luftwaffe wasn't used with all the intensity and the energy which would have been possible. And some of the heads of the Luftwaffe say that once again the slow-down came from Hitler</i>".<br />
<br />
So, if the Luftwaffe had been used properly, no boat could have approached the shores. As most of the boats were small and didn't have any armor, aircrafts could have sunk most of them. As the boarding was made only in certain places (2/3 in the port and 1/3 on the beaches), they could have thrown bombs on the shore to prevent soldiers from embarking and boats from approaching the shore. They could have destroyed the jetty. The escape plan would have been a nightmare and would have been stopped.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>- U-boots and S-boots</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Liddell Hart says that the Kriegsmarine did little use of the U-boats and the S-boats ("Fortunately, the German navy did little to attempt to operate with either u-boot or with speedboats").<br />
<br />
But, it's true that there are counter arguments. The German navy had only 18 speeboats (each had 4 torpedoes). 9 were used at Dunkirk between the 28 and the 4th of June. So, we can't say that Germany didn't use their S-boats, quite the contrary. And they were able to sink around 5 boats (the Siroco, the Abukir, the Stella Dorado , the Argyllshire, the HMS Wakeful; attacked but not sunk: the Cyclone) . At first sight, it's not too bad.<br />
<br />
But as there were tons of boats, and as their way was well known by the Germans, they could have sunk much more than that. They could attack by night and go back at full speed without being seen at any time (it's how the HMS Wakeful was sunk). With this kind of advantage, they could have sunk many more boats (may be 20 or 30). So, finally Liddell Hart is quite right: the German navy did little attempt to use them. And it was most probably a decision from Hitler.<br />
<br />
The U-boats were almost not used at all. The reason evocated is the waters were too shallow. U-boats were too visible. But by night, they were not. And then, they could have sunk many boats. Of course, there was the risk of being attacked by English destroyers after the attack. But, by night, it was much more difficult to find them. Probably not all convoys were protected by Destroyers. After the 29 or the 31 (depending of the sources), the destroyers were removed from Dunkirk because there were too many losses. And the British boats would much more have tried to flee, since German airplanes were patrolling even by night. Once detected, they would have been in great danger. This is why they tried to be as discreet as possible.<br />
<br />
And there have been one or two attacks from U-Boats. So, it wasn't impossible.<br />
<br />
So the fact that the Kriegsmarine was so little used shows that Hitler voluntarily let the British forces flee.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<b>- Land battle</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But most of all, Hitler could have sent his troops and his panzers. There were only 30.000 men to defend Dunkirk (mostly French). They were fighting at 1 against 10, and in some places at 1 against 30. They seriously lacked heavy armaments.<br />
<br />
As the position was unprepared and as the battle was made on a flat land, the Allied troops would have been destroyed in one or two days on several points of the front with just the German artillery. Once again, those troops couldn't have done anything against high explosive shells shot by canons.<br />
<br />
One thing isn't very much known: the 28, the panzers were already in Dunkirk. But Rundstedt (so in fact Hitler) removed them from this front and ordered them to go to the south (see this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FddKPGE19wA" target="_blank">video</a> at 4:51). It's obvious that without this new intervention from Hitler, the French forces would have been obliterated in one or two days by the panzers. Once again Hitler did what was needed to allow the Allied forces to flee.<br />
<br />
So, German forces could have made a break through at any time. But during 8 days, Germans troops were unable to make it. To explain this very strange thing, it is said that the French resistance was fabulous and was able to prevent German forces from advancing, which is ridiculous.<br />
<br />
To make a comparison, during all the Battle of France, it has been the apocalypse for the French army regarding the organization. It was a complete mess. At each battle, troops were knocked down, bypassed, and fooled by the German army. Between the 10th of May and the 20th, Germans were able to make retreat the whole Allied army on 150 kilometers (an army of nearly the same force). But, during nearly the same amount of time, they weren't able to make retreat of 8 km forces with ten times less soldiers than them and very little heavy armament; this on unprepared positions on a flat land. Bullshit.<br />
<br />
So, it's clear that Hitler, not only removed the panzers from this front, but also ordered the German army to fight as little as possible. The fact that only 11.000 men (according to Wikipedia), were killed between the 28 and the 4 (among them only 6.000 on the ground), shows that obviously. As evocated before, if the battle has been fought at full intensity, there would have been at least 100.000 people killed, and probably much more.<br />
<br />
So, between May 24 and June 4, Hitler could have avoided the escape of Allied forces at any time but did not. Thus, we can say that during 12 days Hitler voluntarily let the Allied forces flee (338.000 men were saved).<br />
<br />
Liddell Hart, who had talked with many German generals, said (chap 7): "<i>But Hitler imposed a stop of 3 days to his tanks. His initiative saved the Britannic forces <b>when nothing else could have saved them</b>. By giving them the possibility of escaping, <b>he allowed them to gather in England, to continue the war, and to defend their shores against the threat of an invasion</b>. By doing this, he was at the origin of his fall and the one of Germany, five years later. Conscious that they had got a lot of luck, but ignoring the cause of their safety, English people talked about the "miracle of Dunkirk". How did Hitler come to give this fatal order, and why? <b>In many ways, it kept being still an enigma for German generals themselves, and we will never know with certitude how he came to take that decision and what were his motives</b></i>."<br />
<br />
When you still think that Hitler was for real, you can only think a big "WTF ?!!!!?". But when you understand that Hitler was a zionist jew, this behavior isn't strange anymore.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Liddell Hart gives the following military reasons to explain the behavior of Hitler. All of them are fishy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>1° The desire of having the job done by the Luftwaffe</b><br />
<br />
It was absolutely clear that such a task (blocking the escape route between the 24 and the 26) couldn't be done by the Luftwaffe alone. And there was no reason at all to let the Luftwaffe do the entire job after the 27.<br />
<br />
<b>2° The fear of engaging his panzers in swamps of Flanders </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
There are no swamps in this area. Thus, panzers were perfectly able to advance without any problem.<br />
<br />
It's true that the triangle between Calais, Saint-Omer and Dunkirk is a polder. But it seems that this polder can't be flooded so easily. In fact, it can be flooded only if there are exceptional tides. And even then, the flood seems to come only from rain (probably because then, the water can't be evacuated anymore toward the sea). So, you can't really flood voluntarily the area in a very short time. And the mentioned conditions (exceptional tides and rain) weren't present.<br />
<br />
The 23, German forces were already in the area of the polder. In fact, they were just in the middle of it. Thus, if English had wanted to flood the place, the German forces would have been in danger anyway. As they didn't fear about the flooding of the polder at this very moment, you don't see why they would have feared about being in the polder 15 or 20 km farer. And about eventual swamps, it didn't seem to be a problem when German forces advanced until the Aa canal.<br />
<br />
Between the 28 and the 4, Germans forces were still in the polder. Once again, they didn't seem to fear any threat from the polder.<br />
Between Saint-Omer and Bethune (40 km), there isn't any polder, and no swamp either. So, German troops could have attack here.<br />
<br />
Flooding the zone would have forbid the Allied forces to flee toward Dunkirk. So, it's clear that English couldn't use this solution.<br />
<br />
When you read about the unanimous protests from Chiefs of panzers about the order of stopping right there, it's clear that the polder or the swamps weren't a problem at all. Chiefs of the panzers knew certainly very well the nature of the land. So, if they wanted to continue the offensive, it's certainly because they knew there wasn't any risk.<br />
<br />
<b>3° The desire of keeping his panzers for the next offensive (against the French army)</b><br />
<br />
The Allied forces were fleeing. It was a debacle. So, their ability to fight was very low. And they wouldn't have been able to fight for a long time, since they didn't have enough munitions, gas, and so on. It was not as if German troops were going to fight an army which was organized and was full of supply. So, if German troops had blocked the escaping way, the British army would have been forced to surrender.<br />
<br />
Germans were getting 30 % or 40 % of the British army (230.000 men). There were 500.000 fighting soldiers in the British army (for a total of 1.650.000 men, that is 2 non-fighters for 1 fighter) It would have been a disaster for England. So, the benefits were very high.<br />
<br />
Ok, panzers had got losses. But at Dunkirk, they weren't fighting against 400.000 soldiers having a lot of material. They fought against only 30.000 soldiers on a flat land, on unprepared positions with very little artillery. The losses would have been minimal.<br />
<br />
Hitler had to prevent English troops from escaping. Because he knew he would have to finish England after having defeated France. So, the danger of letting them escape was important.<br />
<br />
Germans had to be able to move the 800.000 men toward the French front (to the south). If the British had kept fighting during two or three weeks, they would have been forced to stay there. If Hitler wanted to have all those forces disposable for the next offensive as soon as possible, it was another reason to defeat the British army very quickly.<br />
<br />
And what if the French army had tried to make a counter-attack? It is said that Hitler was very nervous about a possible counter-attack coming from the French army. Once again, the logical conclusion was to finish the English forces as soon as possible.<br />
<br />
And if there wasn't any counter-attack from French forces, then, there was no problem about trapping the English forces. Some could say that everything had to be done quickly in order to prevent French armies from reinforcing their left flank. But the affair of Dunkirk lasted 12 days, until the 5th of June. And most of the 800.000 German soldiers stayed in front of Dunkirk. So, because of the inaction of Hitler, the French forces had got largely enough time to get reinforcements.<br />
<br />
And if those soldiers had escaped and the war against France hadn't been won quickly, they would have then come back to France by boats (this is what happened for the 113.000 French soldiers). And Hitler would have had 340.000 more soldiers to fight against. The problem was not just about continuing the war against Great Britain in the future, but also about continuing the Battle of France right now. Thus, regarding this problem, letting the possibility of escaping for the Allied forces in order to preserve some panzers was stupid. It was clever only if Hitler knew that he would win the Battle of France very quickly. And yes, he knew this. He knew this because Hitler was a Jewish shill.<br />
<br />
It is also said that panzers got reinforcements between the 4th and 5th of June before attacking French forces. So, there weren't so many problems with the panzers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then, we arrive at the last explanation. Hitler wanted to keep being in good terms with England because he admired it. Thus, he indeed let the British army flee. As the former explanations aren't convincing, the emphasis has been put on this last one by official historians.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But this explanation doesn't worth anything.<br />
<br />
1° Hitler couldn't ignore that England was entirely controlled by Jewish leaders and Freemasons, and had been since a long time. We could even say that he was the most well placed to know he couldn't hope any friendship, nor any clemency from the British government. He knew it was a fight to the death.<br />
<br />
Some say that Churchill was half-jew. Some say he wasn't. I think he was 100 % Jewish. But of course, as Hitler is supposed to have been an extreme anti-Semite, he would have believed at least the first statement. So, how could have he supposed one second that Churchill the half-jew would have made peace with him?<br />
<br />
2° Germany was already in war with England. You can be cool when the war is not already declared. But when you are fighting, things are clear. The guy in front of you is an enemy and you have to kill him or to neutralize him, that's it. And absolutely nothing let appear that the English government wanted to make peace with Germany. So, being so clement with his enemy when the war had already begun was completely crazy. And as such craziness from Hitler was impossible; it was obviously that Hitler was not what he seemed to be.<br />
<br />
And England wasn't known at all for giving up when they have begun a war. Just the contrary. Once the war engaged, they were known to fight until the enemy had lost. Hitler admired England also for that. But suddenly, he had forgotten this.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
So, this explanation for the behavior of Hitler is ridiculous. It doesn't hold one second.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then, only one possible explanation remains: Hitler was a Jewish shill working for greater Jewish leaders. And if he let British escape, but without their heavy armament, it was for the following reasons:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
1° If Hitler had captured all the British forces of Dunkirk, the British army wouldn't have got enough troops to defend England. Then, people would have asked why Hitler didn't try to invade England before attacking Russia (It wasn't about just one or two years). The opening of a second front would have been much more fishy. Ok, English armies couldn't invade Europe yet. But if the war against Russia hadn't been concluded quickly, it would have been a real danger, especially with the possibility of USA declaring war to Germany.<br />
With most of British troops (450.000 of the initial 500.000) back to England, Jewish leaders could justify this. It was then a little bit more credible to say that England was not so badly defended; thus that it would have been quite difficult to invade it.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
2° The fact that British had lost nearly all their heavy weapons during the Battle of France justified the fact that Hitler didn't send many troops against the British forces in North Africa between September 1940 and July 1941. Hitler could say that English armies were somehow neutralized for a long time.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
If the British forces of Dunkirk hadn't lost most of their heavy armament, the British army would still have been a threat for Germany. And then, Hitler would have tried to invade at least North Africa, in order to avoid any invasion from the South of Europe from England or from a very possible future alliance between the USA and England. Thus, Hitler would have postponed the war against Russia (and Jewish leaders didn't want the war to last for a long time). He would have succeeded against the British armies of North Africa and would have taken the oil of the Middle East. Then, Jewish leaders couldn't have justified the strategy of Hitler of attacking mostly in the Caucasus. Strategy which is supposed to have caused the defeat of Hitler. And with all the troops which wouldn't have got to stay in the south of Europe to avoid a possible invasion, it would have been more difficult to explain the defeat of German armies against Russia.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
With the British army still intact but without any heavy armament, the English forces were too strong for an invasion (in the mind of everyday people) but too weak for continuing the war elsewhere (supposedly in the mind of Adolph Hitler). It was perfect for explaining why Hitler didn't try too much to invade England, and also why he didn't send enough troops in North Africa.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
The problem is that there is the enormous discrepancy of Dunkirk. A discrepancy which shows clearly that Hitler was not for real but was a Jewish shill.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
3° As the victory of Hitler during the Battle of France was supposed to be very fast and total, Jewish leaders had to cause some significant losses to the English armies. Otherwise, the escape would have been too perfect and then would have seemed a little bit too fishy. As we have seen it, they couldn't lose many men. Otherwise, the absence of invasion attempt from Hitler would have seemed shady. But with an escape made in a hurry, they could justify the loss of most of the heavy weapons of the British army. Thus, the way the escape happened was more credible. </div>
<br />
<br />hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-24494878894570743882013-05-17T03:30:00.000-07:002013-05-17T03:30:54.591-07:00The absurdity of wanting to develop the vital space to the east<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hitler said in "Mein Kampf" that the vital space of German people had to be taken on eastern lands, that is, Slavic countries.<br /><br />For example, in the chapter XIV of Mein Kampf (1926), in Eastern Orientation or Eastern Policy: "If we speak of soil [to be conquered for German settlement] in Europe today, we can primarily have in mind only Russia and her vassal border states."<br /><br />It was clearly a declaration of war against all Slavic people, since this vital space couldn't only be taken by deportation or by extermination.<br /><br />The problem is that it is ridiculous. Slavs are among the whitest people. If he had been logical, he would have chosen to take the countries of less white nations, like Italy, or east and south Balkan countries.<br /><br />Ok, maybe when you go far to the East, some Russians are more mixed with Asians. But the Slavic countries which are close to Germany (so those which would have been invaded by Germany to get the greater lebensraum) are those of the west. They are the countries where there are the whitest Slavs. So, it would have been the whitest Slavs he would have thrown out of their countries in order to have a bigger vital space for Germany. Thus, instead of throwing out Italian, or people of the east or south of Balkans, Hitler, the so-called champion of the white race, would have thrown out much whiter people. It doesn't make any sense.<br /><br />It's true that he wasn't exactly the champion of the white race, but the champion of the Germanic and Nordic race. But still. After those races, he was the champion of the white race. So, to favor people who were less white instead of pure whites was still completely incredible.<br /><br />It's also true that there are less people in the Balkans than in Russia and its immediate satellites. In 1940, there were around 40 million people in the Balkan, while there were 168 million people in USSR in January 1939 (And after the gain of half of Poland, there were 196 million people). So, it would have been much less interesting in terms of vital space. <br /><br />But Hitler couldn't take more than the western side of USSR. And, according to official historians, it was not in his plans to take more. The problem is the western zone of Russia contains just 50 or 60 % of Russians. So, he wouldn't have got more than 85 or 100 million people there. Thus, he wouldn't have got much more people than taking the whole Poland territory (35 million) and Balkan (40 million).<br /><br />So, why bother about invading Russia, which was very powerful and so very difficult to beat, and which had only 80 or 100 million people, when he could invade Poland and Balkans easily and get place for almost the same number of people?<br /><br />If he had added France, he would have got access to 40 million more (thus 120 million). And even 60 million, since France had a low density of population (thus 140 million). With the French colonies, there would have been space for at least 60-80 million more Germans (thus a total of 200-220 million).<br /><br />And why not conquer Turkey? There were only 20 million people in 1940. But there was clearly enough space to have at least 60 million (even with the agricultural knowledge of 1940).<br /><br />So, there were a lot of different possible combinations, without invading USSR.<br /><br />In 1940, Hitler had already done a good part of the job (he had conquered France, Belgium and half of Poland). So, what if he had said "well, fuck USSR. I am gonna invade Hungary, Croatia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania, Greece, and North Africa"? There wouldn't have been the war against USSR. Thus, Hitler would have kept the power for a very long time. And he would have defeated England easily.<br /><br />It is said that Hitler respected French. This is why he didn't make a policy of extension of his vital space in France. Thus it means that he made distinction between whites. So, why not respect also Slavs, who were even more white than French? <br /><br />So, this policy against Slavic countries doesn't make sense. But it makes completely sense if Hitler was a jew working for greater Jewish leaders who wanted to create Israel.<br /><br />Why did Hitler need to have this policy toward Slavs?<br /><br />There were several reasons:<br /><br />1° USSR was needed by Jewish leaders to trap everyday jews from Eastern and Central Europe in the future Soviet Bloc. Without a war from Hitler against USSR, this wouldn't have been made, since USSR wouldn't have won and thus wouldn't have been able to take over Eastern and Central Europe.<br /><br />2° Jewish leaders needed the war between Germany and the USSR. Otherwise, Germany wouldn't have been beaten. England was much too weak to be able to defeat Germany. There was only the USSR which was a credible adversary, an adversary able to win again Germany. So, as Jewish leaders didn't want the reign of Hitler over Europe to last more than a few years, they had to make loose German's armies. And the only country which could do that was the USSR.<br /><br />3° Jewish leaders also needed Hitler to gather Russian jews. Of course, anyhow, they would have been trapped in USSR after the war. So, for Russian jews, the war was not absolutely necessary. But with the war, they could be expelled from their houses by Nazis, deported, humiliated, and so on... So, they would have been more eager to go to Israel after that.<br /><br /><br />So, for all these reasons, Hitler the jew had to develop this absurd policy in order to justify the invasion of USSR.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />PS:<br /><br />Some say also that Hitler feared the high birth rate of Russia. He feared that Slavs would finally invade the vital space of Germany. But Hitler also said that France would be overwhelmed in 100 or 200 years by African from its colonies. So, he was also conscious that Africa would become a problem for Europe in the near future. But, instead of treating the most important problem (the threat from Africa), he wanted to treat the problem of the very white Russians.<br /><br />He said that he feared the high birth rate of Russia. But Germany had also a high birth rate. So, why was he afraid of being overwhelmed by Russians and not by Africans or by Arabs, or even Turks, who also had a high birth rate.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-2418774111022734332013-05-13T07:51:00.000-07:002013-05-13T11:10:16.909-07:00Why did Jewhis leaders reveal that Hitler was a jew?<div style="text-align: justify;">
As soon as the 30's, there have been stories of Hitler having Jewish ancestries published in newspapers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-z1KSV5WKdWQ/UZD88AAI-hI/AAAAAAAAAAo/WzbvYHq_89c/s1600/hitler_was_jew_1933_chicago_daily_tribune.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-z1KSV5WKdWQ/UZD88AAI-hI/AAAAAAAAAAo/WzbvYHq_89c/s320/hitler_was_jew_1933_chicago_daily_tribune.jpg" width="131" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves/>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
<w:LidThemeOther>FR</w:LidThemeOther>
<w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>
<w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
<w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
<w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
<w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
</w:Compatibility>
<m:mathPr>
<m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
<m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
<m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
<m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
<m:dispDef/>
<m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
<m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
<m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
<m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
</m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"
DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="267">
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Tableau Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
</div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">A paper about Hitler being part jewish publish
in the Chicago Tribune in September, 20, 1933</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And these newspapers were of course owned by Jewish leaders. So, Jewish leaders revealed that Hitler was a jew. Why did they do this quite incredible thing?<br />
<br />
At first sight, it seems stupid. If he was really a jew, they didn't have any reason for telling it. If he wasn't a jew, there was no reason either. Why invent such a story?<br />
<br />
My opinion is that those informations were not intended for gentiles, but for everyday jews. It was an internal communication plan.<br />
<br />
The problem for Jewish leaders was the following: as Hitler was a jew (and 100 % Jewish, so, with a Jewish father and a Jewish mother), it was certainly well known among the jewish community. Jewish leaders couldn't hide this. There were certainly rumors about this among the Jewish community. So, quickly, ordinary jews could have been able to connect the dots, and then to understand that their leaders were betraying them. It would have destroyed the great unity between everyday jews and their leaders. This would have been apocalyptic for these.<br />
<br />
Thus, Jewish leader absolutely needed to deceive ordinary jews about Hitler's Jewishness.<br />
<br />
As jews knew that Hitler was Jewish to some extent, Jewish leaders couldn't say that he wasn't Jewish at all. Everyday jews would have known it was a lie. So, Jewish leaders had to recognize that Hitler was indeed a jew, thus confirming what jews already knew (that is, the part of the story jewish leaders couldn't hide). But the deceiving part was to add that he was just quarter jewish (whereas he was most probably 100 % jewish).<br />
<br />
They sometimes add he was a self-hating jew, thus explaining his hatred against the jews and all the rest of his behavior. But for everydays jews, the self-hater aspect was not the most important one. It was the fact that he was a jew to some extent, thus confirming the rumors from the Jewish community. However, even without adding the self-hater aspect, he couldn't be too jewish, otherwise his anti-Semitism would still have been strange, since he would have known he was a jew from the beginning. Thus, it would have been difficult for him to dislike jews (without being a self-hater). Being quarter jewish made his anti-Semitism possible with or without the self-hater aspect. It could be because he was a self-hater because he had discovered his part Jewishness when he was an adolescent or a young man, or it could be because he didn't know he was a jew and so, became an anti-Semite by the hazards of his existences, his thoughts, his personality, etc… <br />
<br />
So, Jewish leaders couldn't say that he was 100 % jewish, nor that he was 50 % jewish, because the self-hater aspect wouldn't have been credible. He would have known from the beginning that his mother or his father was Jewish. So, he wouldn't have got any special reasons to be a self-hating jew. And of course, the idea that he became an anti-Semite by the hazards of existence, without knowing he had Jewish ancestries, would have been even impossible. And in the mind of jews, it would have meant that most probably he was "one of them". So, his anti-Semite policy would have been more difficult to explain. Jews would have been much more prone to think their leaders were betraying them.<br />
<br />
They couldn't say either that he was just 1/8th Jewish, because jews would have probably known that he was more jew than that. So, it wouldn't have been credible enough concerning what jews already knew. Some would have suspected that their leaders were still lying to them. And again, the self-hater aspect would have been less credible. 1/8th Jewish, it begins to be too distant to justify self-hate. It would have meant that just one of his great grand-parents was a jew. It's too distant to give a feeling of threat. It would also have been too distant in the past to be fully credible. The events regarding the birth of Hitler's great-grandfather would have taken place in 1800 or 1790. And as Jewish leaders wanted to give a shady part to the story in order to make it quite unverifiable (the doubt about the real identity of Hitler's grandfather), it would have been too shady. The doubt would have then been on Hitler's great-grandfather, a guy who would have lived between, let say 1760 and 1820. It would have been too far in the past. Most people already have big doubts about the story of Hitler's grandfather. If the doubt had been on Hitler's great-grandfather, it would have been too much. Nobody would have bought this story, not even jews. However, there would have been no problems with the part of the story saying he became an anti-Semite because he didn't know his ancestries at all.<br />
<br />
So, he absolutely had to be just quarter Jewish, no more, no less. Then, the Jewishness of Hitler was strong enough to confirm the rumors that were spreading in the Jewish community. Because of the shady part about Hitler's father birth, Jewish leaders could still say that Hitler didn't know that he was a jew, and so, that he was able to become an anti-Semite without any guilt. And if they wanted to add a self-hater aspect to the story, it was credible, because his Jewishness was far enough to be ignored by him during all his youth, and close enough to affect him when he would discover it. <br />
<br />
The story of the grand-mother of Hitler having a child in shady circumstances was also invented to give the feeling that Hitler's origins weren't clear. So, the fact that he didn't know this when he was young becomes logical. It gives credibility to the idea of a psychological choc when he discovered the thing, and after that, the self-hater side. If he had got a stable family, it would have been more difficult to hide the fact that he had a Jewish grandfather.<br />
<br />
So, the story of Hitler being the grandson of a Rothschild or of the Jewish merchant Frankenberger is a lie. A lie created by Jewish leaders. But a lie created in order to hide the fact that Hitler was indeed 100 % Jewish and working for Jewish leaders.<br />
<br />
Of course, there are several versions of this story, in order to introduce even more confusion. And of course, now that those stories are gaining momentum with Internet, they are debunked (this was ordered by Jewish leaders). Thus, Jewish leaders are able, depending on the public who will read the story, to sustain or to debunk this theory. Most of the time, as the public is mostly constituted of gentiles; they will finally debunk the story, in order to make people still believe to the official story (Hitler being a gentile nazi). It's also aimed at jews who are not well informed (they are many). But the debunking is never complete. Thus, there is always a possibility for the most conspirationnistes to still believe the version of Hitler being quarter Jewish.<br />
<br />
For the moment, it's impossible to know from which Jewish family Hitler really came. But it's not very important. The important point is that he was a 100 % Jewish. And we know that just by understanding his role and the one of Jewish leaders in the entire World War II affair.<br />
<br />
So Hitler was not 1/8th, not quarter, not half, but 100 % Jewish. Probably, he was a member of a rich Jewish family and had been educated in the best schools to become a leader.<br />
<br />
<br />
PS: The good thing for Jewish leaders is that the shady details of this story push gentiles to think that it's phony and that Hitler was 100 % a gentile.<br />
<br />
Another good thing for Jewish leaders is that it allows them to introduce confusion and to deceive gentile nationalists about Hitler nowadays. Gentiles come to think that all those revelations are false, since they come from jews (at the beginning, and even now). And indeed, they come 99 % of the time from jews or crypto jews. Of course, fake nationalist leaders don't stop using this argument.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-6588517269125797932013-05-09T02:13:00.001-07:002013-05-10T02:32:55.220-07:00How Jewish leaders forced jews to go to IsraelAs we have seen it at the beginning of this blog, Hitler was put in power by Jewish leaders in order to force jews to go to Israel. Jewish leaders could steal Palestine, but they couldn't force directly everyday jews to go to Israel. But, Hitler was not the only element put in place to force everyday jews to go to Israel. It was vaster than just Hitler.<br />
<br />
With Hitler, Jewish leaders couldn't have directly a massive immigration to Israel. But they were able to:<br />
<br />
1) Push 200,000 jews to emigrate to Israel during the 30's and 40's<br />
<br />
2) Create Israel with the deportation of jews (real) and the story of the holocaust (not real)<br />
<br />
3) Allows jewish leaders to trap everyday jews of the east of Europe in the not friendly at all post war USSR and then give them the choice of staying in USSR of going to Israel<br />
<br />
<br />
1° with the hostility of Hitler toward jews, Jewish leaders were able to push something like 200,000 jews to emigrate to Israel (180,000 between 1929 and 1939 and 20,000 between 1939 and 1945).<br />
<br />
It wasn't big. But it was a beginning.<br />
<br />
2° we already know that the story of the holocaust (which, of course, never happened) was invented in order to give Jewish leaders even more power, by preventing any criticism against jews, and thus against themselves. But I now think that the main reason for the creation of this lie was the creation of Israel. Of course, Jewish leaders could steal the Palestine without any problem. But they still needed a reason to say that now, Palestine was officially Israel. With the holocaust, Jewish leaders were able to do that. It allowed them to create a shock in the opinion of the world. Thus, they were able to justify the fact that England gave Palestine to jews, which then became Israel. Nobody could decently refuse this gift to people who had suffered so much.<br />
<br />
3° the third aspect of Hitler's role was to trap everyday jews of Eastern Europe (and some of Western Europe) in the USSR (of course, there was the USSR + its satellites. But to simplify, I will say USSR or Soviet Bloc). As Hitler was presented as a crazy anti-Semite, the fact that he put millions of everyday jews into camps located in Eastern Europe was considered as normal. They also had to create the post-war USSR. It was possible with Hitler. Hitler declared war to USSR. The war was of course staged. And as USSR won this faked war against Germany, it allowed Jewish leader to justify the takeover of most parts of Eastern and Central Europe by the USSR.<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
Thus, as USSR wasn't now a very good place for jews (after the purges from Staline) and for people in general, Jewish leaders could give a deal to jews of this area, saying "you come to Israel which is now a land of milk and honey, or you stay in this very unfriendly area were you don't have any future".<br />
<br />
The war also allowed Jewish leaders to destroy the houses and the wealth of many of the ordinary jews. Thus, they were more eager to choose to go to Israel instead of staying in USSR.<br />
<br />
With that, they were able to make come 350.000 Eastern jews to Israel between 1948 and 1952. However, this is official statistics. There were probably much more people who came from USSR just after the war; probably 1 million.<br />
<br />
<br />
As Hitler hasn't forbidden the emigration of jews from Germany between 1933 and October 1941, Jewish leaders had to avoid a massive escape toward countries which wouldn't be under the control of Hitler during wwII (except Palestine of course).<br />
<br />
It is said by the "United State Holocaust Museum" that there was 523.000 jews in Germany in 1933. As this figure is given by Jewish leaders, maybe it's a false one given to hide the fact that much more Germans jews were trapped in Germany.<br />
<br />
In 1933 the "United State Holocaust Museum" says that 38.000 jews fled Germany. But they went to European countries which were invaded by Hitler during wwII (France, Belgium, Netherland, Denmark). So, they were nearly all arrested.<br />
<br />
After that, the emigration decreased until 1938. Hitler probably blew hot and cold. During some years before wwII, Hitler played the reasonable guy, the moderate. And it seems jews hoped that Hitler would remove laws which were hostile to them. Jewish leaders tricked everyday jews in order to make most part of them stay in Germany.<br />
<br />
After the events of 1938 and 1939, there was a huge increase of Jewish emigration. But suddenly, occidental countries refused to accept jews anymore. The USA, England, France, Sweden, etc, let only few jews immigrate. Jews still keep a huge bitterness about that (we can understand them).<br />
<br />
Of course, as those countries were ruled by jews, such behavior was completely abnormal. The jew Roosevelt or the jew Churchill, or the jew Blum should have accepted all those ordinary jews without any question. But, as the plan of Jewish leaders was to force jews to go to Israel, it becomes completely normal.<br />
<br />
Jewish leaders needed everyday jews to stay in Europe. So, they had to block the departures of jews outside of Continental Europe. They had to create something like a fish trap, forcing jews to go to only one destination: Israel. Of course, they let some jews go to the USA, or South America, and so on. Otherwise, the trap would have been too obvious for ordinary jews.<br />
<br />
The fact that Hitler let quite a huge number of jews flee Germany was probably made to maintain the illusion that all this was not planed and that it was his chaotic behavior which leaded him to let some jews go and finally forbid the rest of them from leaving Germany.<br />
<br />
Remember, the illusion that everything was due to the hazard of history and had nothing to do with a plan from Jewish leaders had to be perfect. Otherwise, everyday jews and gentiles would be very very angry.<br />
<br />
The economic crisis and the rise of protectionism allowed Jewish leaders to explain partly why occidental countries didn't want to rescue jews. So, it's clear that those economic events and policies were also staged by Jewish leaders.<br />
<br />
But, in fact, the emigration of German jews before 1938 was not a so important problem. Because, most of the European jews were in other European countries, especially the ones of Eastern Europe. So Jewish leaders could let 200.000 or 250.000 jews flee far away. They knew that the biggest part of the Jewish population was still there. And they knew that they could gather them at the decided moment, and fix them in the future USSR Empire.<br />
<br />
However, once the gather had begun, everything had to be done quickly, in order to avoid escapes from ordinary jews. This is one of the reasons why Hitler had to win his victory quickly and chain them quickly too. With that, jews couldn't flee fast enough.<br />
<br />
Maybe this is why the jew Stalin invaded Poland with Hitler. It prevented the Polish jews to escape anywhere.<br />
<br />
This constraint explains the Blitzkrieg. With it, Jewish leader could explain the fact that Hitler invaded France and USSR very quickly. They didn't really need the explanation of the Blitzkrieg against Poland, Austria and Czechoslovakia, since those were small countries compare to Germany. But it helped a little bit to explain their quick defeat.<br />
<br />
It explains why Hitler had to invade Austria in March 1938, then Czechoslovakia one year after in March 1939, then Poland just few months after that (September 1939), then Denmark and Norway (April 1940), then Netherland, Belgium and France (May 1940), then USSR (June 1941). Everything had to be done quickly. Otherwise, ordinary jews would have fled away.<br />
<br />
The invasion of USSR just one year after the invasion of France allowed also Jewish leaders to explain the defeat of Hitler because of a two front war. So, it allowed explaining two elements instead of just one; a good thing for Jewish leaders. On the other side, it brought the discrepancy of precisely the two fronts war. And this was a bad thing for the coherence of the Jewish leader plan.<br />
<br />
This is also why USA, England and France closed their door to jews. It was aimed at German and Austrian jews, but even more at jews from Eastern Europe.<br />
This is also why Hungary (1938 and November 1940), Romania (November 1940), Yugoslavia (March 1941) and Bulgaria (March 1941) suddenly allied with Germany. It avoided the possible escape of jews from Eastern and Central Europe in those countries. And it had to be done at the same time than invasions of the other countries of Europe. It couldn't be done long before, because jews would have been more suspicious about a possible danger against them. The good thing for Jewish leaders, is that those alliances, and their timing, were quite logical. There weren't discrepancies about them.<br />
<br />
Then after the war, the millions of jews from Eastern and Central Europe were trapped in the not fun at all USSR. This is why USSR had to win so many territories of Eastern and Middle Europe during its war against Germany. Jews had to be trapped in the Soviet Bloc, and to have only two choices: staying in this horrible place where they had no future, or going to the paradise of Israel.<br />
<br />
This is why freedom of movements were severely restricted and controlled in USSR. Everydays jews had to be unable to move to other countries except Israel. Of course, it was aimed at gentiles too. Otherwise, they would have fled also. And Jewish leaders needed USSR in order to maintain cold war and thus, to maintain the restrictions of emigration toward the USA or England for jews. But the first target was jews.<br />
<br />
After the war, it wasn't over. The very strange McCarthyism and the cold war allowed avoiding an important emigration from USSR jews toward occidental countries. The cold war made USSR forbid any emigration toward Western countries. And for the few jews who would have been able to emigrate, as jews were suspected of being communist spies or just communists, Western countries refused them. Jews from Arab countries were also affected by this. It was especially true during the McCarthy's era. McCarthyism probably also pushed some American jews to go to Israel.<br />
<br />
We can think that the Cold War lasted so long in order to make those recent Israelis become accustomed to their country, so they would not want to go to a European country or to the USA once Cold War would be over. Many probably tried to go to the USA, but where rejected because of a suspicion of communist tendencies. So, they stayed in Israel, and got used to it.<br />
<br />
For the jews who came during the 90's, as Israel was then a rich country, they wanted less to go elsewhere. And at this moment, occidental countries restricted the coming of migrants because of the economic crisis.<br />
<br />
According to official sources 350,000 jews came from the Soviet Bloc between 1948 and 1952. Nearly none between 1952 and 1960. 157,000 between 1960 and 1986. And one million during the 90's.<br />
<br />
We can think that many jews went to Israel with secret agreements between USSR and Israel government during the 1948-1960 period. It had to be kept secret. Otherwise, it would have seemed quite fishy. Why USSR would have allowed that, since they were supposed to be more or less hostile to Israel? The 350,000 are why the lack of emigration from USSR after that is shady. They would have let 350.000 jews go away during two or three years, but, suddenly, wouldn't allow emigration anymore during 8 years? Very strange.<br />
<br />
Or maybe there have been much more jews who arrived just after the war than officially said, maybe 1 million instead of 350,000. Probably also that as jews were supposed to have been nearly all killed because of the shoah, Jewish leaders couldn't tell that there was almost 1 million jews who came to Israel just after the war.<br />
<br />
However, after 1960, emigration from USSR was authorized by the Soviet government. Thus, between 1960 and 1986, there was officially 157.000 jews who went to Israel from USRR. The figures were probably also underestimated. As Jewish leaders were able to lie so much about wwI and wwII, and tons of other events, it wasn't a problem at all for them to cheat about real figures of Jewish emigration toward Israel. They were able to hide this unofficial emigration behind a birth rate higher than it was really. <br />
<br />
And in the 90's, as the USA didn't give refugee status unconditionally to jews from ex-USSR anymore, there was 1 million jews who went to Israel.<br />
<br />
So, at the end, there were officially 1,510,000 jews who came from USSR. And unofficially, we can think there were 2,110,000.<br />
<br />
There were 375,000 jews who came to Israel between 1919 and 1948, mostly because of the hostility from Poland and after that German Government. So, if we add this emigration, we have 1,885,000 (725,000 between 1919 and 1948 and 1,160,000 between 1960 and 1995) jews who came officially from Eastern and Central Europe to Israel between 1919 and 1995 because of the conspiracy of Jewish leader. And unofficially, we can suppose that there were 2,485,000. Jewish leaders didn't make all this mess to have just 725.000 European jews coming in Israel until 1948 and just 157,000 more until 1990. The goal was more probably to have at least 1,500,000 jews until 1948. There were only 650,000 jews in Israel officially in 1848. With only 700.000 more jews form Europe and Arabian countries, there were only 1,350,000 in 1952. Not enough.<br />
<br />
<br />
PS :<br />
<br />
There were other sources of Jewish immigration staged by Jewish leaders.<br />
<br />
1) Immigration from Iraq and Iran<br />
<br />
2) Immigration from former French colony in North Africa (Morocco mainly, but also Algeria and Tunisia)<br />
<br />
In those both cases, everything was once again staged by Jewish leaders. But we will see that in another paper.<br />
<br />hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-22481045257371334272013-05-06T02:58:00.003-07:002013-05-06T03:00:15.857-07:00Why was the strait of Gibraltar crucial for Hitler?If Hitler had controlled the strait of Gibraltar, there would have been the following consequences:<br />
<br />
1) Hundreds of thousands soldiers and tons of material free from waiting for a possible invasion on the shores of Italy or the south of France.<br />
<br />
2) German and Italian armies could have beaten easily the English forces in North Africa. English government could still have supplied its armies by the Suez Canal, theoretically. But it would have been much too far to let them be able to sustain a war. So, quickly, English forces would have been defeated and Germans would have taken the control of the Suez Canal also. <br />
<br />
3) Then, the Mediterranean Sea would have been totally free of Allies forces. It would have become a German sea.<br />
<br />
4) German forces would then have had access to the oil of Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Then they wouldn't have got to worry about the oil of Caucasus. Thus, Hitler the jew couldn't have justified his huge strategic mistake of concentrating his forces in Caucasus and not against Moscow.<br />
<br />
5) The oil of the Middle East wouldn't have been available for the Allies anymore. The USA supplied GB with its oil. But oil from the Middle East was probably used to supply British armies on the Asian front.<br />
<br />
6) The supply lines of the English armies regarding their Asian empire would have been much longer. Thus it would have been much difficult for them to win battles against Japon's forces.<br />
<br />
7) There wouldn't have been the invasion of Sicily, Italy and South of France. And Hitler wouldn't have had to send tons of material and soldiers in order to defend these areas. And Hitler had to know that there was an important danger on this side, since England controlled the Mediterranean Sea.<br />
<br />
8) Thus, the war would have lasted longer. It would have been more difficult and longer for the Allies to win. Or the plan of Jewish leaders would have been less coherent.<br />
<br />
So, because of the troops and material economized, the access to Middle East oil (and the loss of this oil for the Allies), the strategic implication about the war against Russia, the possible loss of his Asian empire for England, controlling the strait of Gibraltar was absolutely crucial for Hitler.<br />
<br />
But, as Hitler was in fact a Zionist jew, he had to avoid obtaining the control of it.hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-22554830827340401292013-05-05T21:56:00.000-07:002013-05-05T22:32:52.153-07:00The armistice of 1940 : the strange clemency of the jew Hitler toward FranceThere is another discrepancy which, among other things, has to do with the possible takeover of the strait of Gibraltar from Hitler. It's about the armistice between Germany and France after the defeat of French armies in 1940.<br />
<br />
The treaty is quite bizarre. Hitler let a free zone for French people in the south of France (representing nearly half of the French territory) and he let them their colonies. The French armies were completely defeated. So, he could have invaded the entire territory of France and said "now, all your possessions belong to me". French government couldn't have said anything to that. But no, he decides to let a free zone. And he decides also to let them their colony. A very strange clemency.<br />
<br />
But, when you know Hitler was a zionist jew and you observe the north African map, you understand why Hitler the jew did that.<br />
<br />
France possessed colonies at this time in North Africa. They possessed Tunisia, Algeria, AND Morocco. And Morocco is at the south side of the strait of Gibraltar.<br />
<br />
So, if Hitler had decided not to be clement, and to take every French possessions and territories (by an imposed treaty), he would have also taken Morocco. And then, he would have controlled the strait of Gibraltar. Spain controlled a thin band of the north of the Morocco territory, but the French territory was largely near enough of the strait of Gibraltar to let Hitler be able to control it without invading the Spanish protectorate. But Hitler could have also invaded the Spanish protectorate. Spain couldn't have stopped the German armies.<br />
<br />
And what would have happened if Hitler had controlled the strait? Germany would have controlled the entire Mediterranean Sea, and all the north of Africa. Then, they wouldn't have had to keep large forces in the south of Europe and in North Africa. They could have invade Iraq an take his oil. England would have been very far from his Indian colonies.<br />
<br />
And at this time (September 1940), England was unable to prevent this from happening. So, there was nobody to stop Hitler from invading French (and eventually Spanish) Morocco.<br />
<br />
Thus, as Hitler was a jew, he had to show such a strange clemency toward France, and to let them keep the south of France and all their colonies. Without this clemency, Germany would have been stronger and England weaker. And it would have been longer to finish the faked wwII. Or the events would have been less coherent and thus less believable.<br />
<br />
It also explains why the German armies didn't rush toward Morocco (and didn't install a simple defensive line against English armies. English armies which would have been defenseless once the strait of Gibraltar controlled, because of a lack of supplies) instead of trying to obliterate English armies when they decided to fight in North Africa (February 1941).<br />
<br />
So by not invading Morocco in 1940 or in February 1941, Hitler let England the time to rebuild its forces and to be able (with the USA), to invade Morocco (in November 1942). And all this was planned from the beginning.<br />
<br />
And this discrepancy is even more important than the one about Hitler not forcing Spain to give him the control of the strait of Gibraltar, or the one about not invading Spain. It shows even more clearly that Hitler was in fact a traitor who acted intentionally to avoid taking control of the strait. The case of Spain was already extremely shady. But the fact that he also avoided taking control of French North Africa during two years and a half leaves no doubt about his real nature.hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-54009899176984960682013-05-05T01:07:00.000-07:002013-05-05T01:16:25.736-07:00Why the jews Franco and Salazar were put in power<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the jews Franco and Salazar were put in power by Jewish leaders, it was to give a reason for Hitler to not attack these countries during WWII (especially Spain). If those two countries had been republics, they would have presented a threat for Hitler, just because of the possibility of a secret alliance with England and the USA in order to allow them to invade the European continent. So, just to avoid this possible threat, Hitler could have decided to invade those countries.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And even without considering them as enemies, Hitler wouldn't have got any scruple or hesitation to invade them in order to control the strait of Gibraltar, which was a crucial strategic point in the war against England.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
But if those countries were semi-allies, because they were more or less in the same ideological camp, Jewish leaders could justify the fact that Hitler didn't invade them. The idea mainstream Medias sell to us is that Hitler was a sentimentalist and a man of honor, thus he couldn't attack his former ally. Without those moral problems, he would have surely tried to take control of the strait of Gibraltar by a way or another. So, it prevents people from thinking that the behavior of Hitler toward Spain was very strange.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But, even with this explanation, this is still extremely shady. Franco was in debt with the Axis. Without the help of Hitler and Mussolini, he would never have won the civil war. Hitler should have been very upset about that. And Hitler wasn't sentimental at all toward his former allies during the night of the long knives (just 6 or 7 years before). So, he should have shown no mercy toward Franco. He would have said "you give me the strait of Gibraltar, or I invade Spain in just one month and I kill you when it's finished". And between September 1940 and July 1941, Hitler had all his forces unemployed. So, his entire army was available to invade Spain. Even with only a quarter of German forces, the invasion would have taken only three weeks.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Note : the Axis needed to control the strait of Gibraltar as soon as September 1940; because Italy had begun a war against England in North Africa. Hitler sent troops to help Italy the 6th of February 1941. And as Hitler planned to invade USSR in 1941, he needed to control the strait very quickly before using his main forces in the battle against Russia.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<br />
On the side of Franco, mainstream history tells us that he was in fact quite a moderate politically and thus, that he didn't like Hitler. He thought he was completely insane. This is why he didn't help him during wwII. The other reason was that Spain was exhausted because of the civil war. Thus, he didn't want to engage his country in another war.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The very convenient divergence of political opinion was of course staged by Jewish leaders. The purpose was to explain the lack of alliance between Franco and Hitler during wwII.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The other reason is quite bullshit if you think a little bit about it. England couldn't invade Spain at this time (1940/1941). And Germany would have endorsed all the military and financial investments. So, Spain didn't risk anything at this time. And as Hitler was winning, the smart move was apparently to be his ally. The danger of a war against Germany was then much more probable than the one of a war against England.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The choice of Franco of choosing Allies against Hitler is very bizarre. Indeed, his neutrality meant clearly that he was helping the Allied camp against Hitler; because, it prevented Hitler from being able to get access to the strait of Gibraltar. He had chosen his side, and it was the side of the Allies. It's quite obvious that he did that because he thought that the Allies were the most powerful force and was afraid of it. But first, it's quite absurd, since Hitler was the ultra-dominant force in Europe after summer of 1940. And the Allies were in complete distress. So, it could only be long term estimation. But, at this moment, how could he know the Allies would win? In September 1940, it was an incredibly visionary prevision. But not incredible at all if Franco knew that the war was staged and was a conscious part of the conspiracy.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And it doesn't remove the fact that his choice was still extremely dangerous. Hitler was extremely aggressive and had shown that his armies were able to win in just one or two months against weak armies (like the ones of Franco) and even against powerful ones (like the ones of France and England). So, there was a great danger of Hitler attacking Spain sooner or later in order to get the control of the strait of Gibraltar. The reasoning of Franco was good, but only if Hitler didn't attack him during the next 2 or 3 years. It was good for the long term (if his prevision were good), but not for the short or middle term. His decision shows he was quite sure that Hitler wouldn't attack. But how could he know that? He could because he knew the Jewish leaders plan.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But choosing the side of the Allies wasn't enough. Franco had to thought that the Allies would excuse is alliance with Hitler and Mussolini during the civil war, and so, would let him keep the power after wwII. He had to be sure the Allies would forgive him and would let him in place. But once again, how could he know that? He knew that because he was a zionist Jew working for Jewish leaders.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If Franco had been a for real, he wouldn't have trusted them. He would have more trusted Hitler than the Jews Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill. So, even if they had promised to let him keep the power, he wouldn't have trusted them and would have chosen Hitler. Because of that, Franco was more interested in a victory of Hitler than a one of the Allies. But, Franco was not for real. He was a jew put in power to explain why Hitler wasn't able to take the strait of Gibraltar.<br />
<br />
<br />
The fact that Spain civil war ended in 1939, just before wwII was also staged by Jewish leader. If civil hadn't ended, Hitler would have had a reason to invade Spain a take control of the strait of Gibraltar.<br />
<br />
<br />
If Franco (and Salazar) had been for real, he wouldn't have gained the power in the first place. Jewish leaders would never have let him win. They would have sent tons of military material and soldiers from France, England, and USA, and would have restored a Jewish democracy. In fact, even the civil war would never have taken place. Spain and Portugal were already totally controlled by jews. If the civil war happened, this is because Jewish leaders wanted it to happen.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The fact that the civil war opposed kinds of fascists against communists allows Jewish leaders to explain why democracies didn't intervened, and even why they let Franco win. The official explanation is that they didn't want a communist country in Spain. Thus, they let Franco win. So, the rise of these two specific camps was of course also staged.<br />
<br />
<br />
The fact that Franco and Salazar were jews doesn't need to be proven with the help of documents or testimonies. They were jews because they were clearly part of the Jewish leaders plan, and like for Hitler, Jewish leaders couldn't use gentiles for this work, even corrupted ones. They needed people of absolute trust…, thus, jews… And the fact that they weren't expelled from power after the war or that their countries weren't submitted to retaliations (like an economic embargo) shows also that they were jews.<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, for Franco, it seems that some people say that he has Jewish ancestries (John Toland for example in his book about Adolph Hitler of 1976, p887).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
About Salazar, the name itself says much. Lazar is a Jewish name. For example, you can find the jew Ken L. Salazar in government of Obama as Secretary-designate. And in the "dictionary of Jewish family names" from Paul Levy (2006), you find Azar and Lazar.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-34220048869085749922013-05-03T08:39:00.000-07:002013-05-03T21:11:49.561-07:00Almost no books about jews or Freemasons plots under the Hitler's reign<div style="text-align: justify;">
Another discrepancy about Hitler and the nazis is that you almost don't have any book about the jews and their plots, or about Freemasons.<br />
<br />
Nazis were in power during 12 years (between 1933 and 1945), and there is almost not even one book about the subject.<br />
<br />
Whereas if Hitler and the nazis had been for real, we should have dozens of very well documented books, edited in hundred of thousand of copies, all traduced in many languages.<br />
<br />
Imagine all the secrets about jews which would have been accessible with all the power of the Nazi state and the knowledge of the secret police. And it would have been true not only for Germany and Italy, but after 1940, it would also have been true for France, Belgium, Poland, Czechoslovakia, etc.., etc... The German Secret Services could also have used their power to learn secrets about jews and Freemasons of Great Britain, USSR and the USA. So, people should have gained access to completely hidden informations.<br />
<br />
But if Hitler and the top ranked nazis were in fact jews, it becomes completely normal.</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-17811927309518086042013-05-03T07:02:00.002-07:002013-05-03T07:02:42.139-07:00Events pushing Germans to vote for Hitler were staged by Jewish leaders<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, many events from the 20's and 30's were made with the goal of pushing people to vote for Hitler.<br /><br />1)
The German revolution was made of course to provoke a change of
government (empire to republic). But the secondary goal was to create a
hatred from goys toward jews with the theory of the stab in the back
defended later by the nazi's. And of course, it allowed Nazis to present
communism and jews as enemies to German people.<br /><br />2) The treaty of
Versailles and the reparations were made to make German people
displeased and to make them feel discontent toward English and French
governments.<br /><br />3) The hyperinflation of 1923 was voluntarily
created in order to ruin a part of the upper middle class, and so, to
make them very angry. The other goal was probably to suppress the debt
of the German government. Being liberated from the debt, it was then
easier for them to make a rearmament (also with the help of jewish
money).<br /><br />We can find in Wikipedia informations about the fact that hyperinflation was very favorable to Hitler.<br /><br />"<em>Although the inflation ended with the introduction of the Rentenmark and the Weimar Republic continued for a decade afterwards, <strong>hyperinflation is widely believed to have contributed to the Nazi takeover of Germany and Adolf Hitler's rise to power</strong>.
Adolf Hitler himself in his book, Mein Kampf, makes many references to
the German debt and the negative consequences that brought about the
inevitability of "National Socialism". The inflation also raised doubts
about the competence of liberal institutions, especially amongst a
middle class who had held cash savings and bonds. It also produced
resentment of bankers and speculators, whom the government and press
blamed for the inflation.[16] Many of them were Jews, and some Germans
called the hyperinflated Weimar banknotes Jew Confetti</em>".<br /><br />4)
The Ruhr invasion in 1923 and 1924 (officially made to oblige German
government to pay the reparations), was another action made to produce
discontent in the German population.<br /><br />5) Same thing, the stock
market crash of 1929 and the great depression which followed were made,
among other things, with the goal of provoking the ruin of the German
upper middle class, the impoverishment of the middle class and also
provoking a massive amount of unemployment, thus creating even more
discontent.<br /><br />6) All the informations about the involvement of jews
in the Russian revolution were given to increase the resentment against
jews. We can notice that after 1940, when nazism was no more necessary,
suddenly, we haven't informations about the jews in USSR anymore. Some
people will say it's because jews were expelled from power by Stalin.
But when jewish leaders have the power, they never let it go so easily.
So, it's obvious that jews were still possessing the power after Stalin.
And then, we should have informations about them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-46855499812057273762013-05-03T03:46:00.000-07:002013-05-03T03:46:20.482-07:00World War I was staged by Jewish leaders also<div style="text-align: justify;">
I have already presented the plan behind ww2. They have put the jew
Hitler in power in order to oblige everyday jews to go to Israel. After
losing everything and being in the suddenly hostile USSR after the war,
the choice of going to Israel seemed a quite good deal for them.<br /><br />But Jewish leaders were obliged to make a plan in <b>two parts</b>. They couldn't
have a Hitler all of a sudden. And for their ww2 plan, they had to
control every important countries. And it seems that, in 1914, Russia
was not into control yet. Great Britain was, France was, USA were,
Germany and Austria most probably were. But it seems that it was not the
case of Russia.<br /><br />Or maybe it was. But they had to justify the
future hatred against jews and Russia (which had become communist at
this time) from the future nazi government. So, even if it was in
control, they had to destroy the Russian government and to replace it by one with a very visible domination from jews.<br /><br />So they had to create a first European war in order to create the conditions of success for the ww2 plan and finally for the creation of Israel.<br /><br />So, with ww1, they were able to :<br /><br />1)
Justify the rise of Hitler because of the Versailles treaty, the
poverty caused by the war (and by the jews after the collapse stocks
markets of October 1929), the supposed stab in the back from jews in
1918, and the communist-jewish menace from USSR.<br /><br />2) Justify the war against the now communist and dominated by jews USSR in 1940.<br /><br />3)
They were also able to create the condition of existence for Israel in
the middle-east. The Turkish empire was too big and too powerful for the
future Israel. They had to split it into several pieces in order to
have only countries with little or average size and power. With ww1,
they were able to justify the collapse of the Turkish empire in 1920.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
With this new interpretation of those events, we can also understand why
wwI lasted 4 years. In fact, in Europe, the goal of the war was to
create revolutions in Russia and Germany. And the plan of jewish leaders
was to explain them by the fact that people were fed up with the war.
So the war had to last quite a long time in order to explain revolts
from people. It had to last at least 3 years to explain in a convincing
way the Russian revolution.<br /><br />But, as the Russian revolution
allowed Germany to transfer its armies from the east to the west, thus
increasing greatly his forces against French/English armies, the war
needed to last longer than 3 years. German armies had to win some more
times in 1918 before beginning to lose. And they had to begin to lose.
Because otherwise, the German revolution wouldn't have been believable. A
revolution when a country is winning, it is quite bizarre. It's less
bizarre when it is loosing. So, this added nearly one year of war after
the Russian revolution.<br /><br />In fact, jewish leaders ended the war
quite too quickly, because the change in the balance of forces was too
quick to be honest. In marsh 1918, German armies got reinforcements from
east troops. Between marsh and July 1918, they were still able to make
large breakthroughs. But, suddenly, in august, it was finished. The
allies were making German armies retreat everywhere.<br /><br />Anyway, with
Germany beginning to retreat a little bit, they were able to launch the
German revolution (in 10/30/1918 at Kiel). Once again, this operation
was done too fast not to be something staged. In only 12 days, the
revolution had succeed and Guillaume II was fleeing toward Netherlands
(11/10/1918). In fact, it was even better than that. Because, until the
11/6/1918, the revolution was limited to Kiel. So, in only 4 days, the
revolution had succeeded and Guillaume II was fleeing. A little to
incredible. <br /> </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
They were obliged to have a revolution in Germany in order to explain
the rise of Hitler. Without it, the empire would have been still in
place, and Hitler couldn't have come to power (since there would have
been no election for supreme power). Or it would have been much
difficult to explain. Jewish leaders were obliged to have a republic to
be able to have Hitler as the chancellor 15 years later.<br /><br />The
revolution also allowed them to end the war sooner. Without it, they
would have been obliged to have a military victory. And it would have
been much longer (may be 1 or 2 more years). Or it would have been less
logical.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, as Jewish leaders didn't need the war anymore after the
German revolution, they could end it right away. But maybe another
reason forced them to end the war very quickly after the German
revolution. As Jewish leaders like symbols and numerology, maybe they
wanted to
finish the war the 11/11/1918 (number eleven is important for them, as
we have known it since 9/11 events). So, in order to fit with this date,
they were pressed to end the war quicker than they would probably have done if they hadn't got this numerical symbol in mind.<br /><br />The revolution also permitted jewish leaders to advance
the stab in the back theory, which made German people hostile toward
jews. This was another explanation of the rise of Hitler.<br /><br />So, in
fact, the war lasted a long time not because the defense was too strong
at this time (thus preventing any breakthrough into the enemy lines),
but because jewish leaders needed it to last enough time to be able to
explain de Russian and the German revolutions.<br /><br />And all those
stupid bloody attacks with only a gain of 1 or 2 kms and 100.000 deads
each time were also made with the goal of justifying the discontent from
troops and also civilians. And thus justifying Russian and German
revolutions.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It also allows Jewish leaders to explain the hatred for war from French and English people and government during the 20's and the 30's, thus explaining their passivity against Germany's rearmament, about the expansion wars from Hitler, and the strategy of "defense only" from the French government (which allows them to explain the fact that the Allied armies lost in 1940). </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4046905650738873963.post-45893073622875980622013-05-03T01:25:00.000-07:002013-05-03T01:25:08.385-07:00The shady things about Hitler sustaining the idea he was a zionist jew<div class="postbody" style="text-align: justify;">
There are many things which are much too shady
about Hitler and which sustain the idea he was jew working for more
powerful jewish leaders and that all those events were faked and
planned.<br /><br />1) First of all, in a country dominated by jews as was
Germany during the 20's and the 30's, it would have been impossible for a
hostile goy like Hitler to come to power. When they control a country,
jewish leaders don't let hostile goyims take back the power. So, the
rise of Hitler is unbelievable, especially in such a short period of
time.<br /><br />2) The reaction of Hitler about Dunkirk is also incredible.
He can capture the entire English army. But what does he do ? He let
them flee. What !!? And the Hitler's pretext is that he had a great
respect for England ! Wtf !!? No, only a traitor acts like that. A real
nazi would never have done that.<br /><br />He did that because he was a
zionist jew. And as the war was a fake one, he had to let the english
army flee. Otherwise, England couldn't have continued the war. And the
USA couldn't have made the D-day and won the war with the USSR as it was
planned.<br /><br />3) Hitler knew a two-front war was something he had to
avoid at all costs. He told many times that it was that which had lead
to the defeat during WWI. But what does he do ? He attacks USSR before
having destroyed England, thus creating a... two-front war.<br /><br />4)
Hitler doesn't invade the strait of Gibraltar, which would have made him
the master of the Mediterranean sea, thus preventing the battles of
north Africa, and also the invasion of Italy and of the south of France.
The communication lines between England and its empire (like India),
would have been much more extended.<br /><br />Maybe he would have been
obliged to invade Spain also. But without the threat of an invasion in
the south of Europe, he would have been able to remove troops from other
areas, like Greece. And as Spain was exhausted by the war of 1936
(which had ended in 1939), it would have been very easy to defeat it.<br /><br /><br />Another one than myself has seen other discrepancies :<br /><br />5)
"The Jew Hitler refuses to even feint an attack on Britain to draw the
British navy to the channel, were it could be obliterated by aircraft".<br /><br />Very
relevant. England could prevent a landing with their fleet. But their
fleet could have been destroyed by the german aircraft.<br /><br />6) "The
Jew Hitler declares war on the U.S., even though he was no more obliged
to declare war on the U.S. than Japan was obliged to declare war on the
Soviet Union, which Germany had been fighting since June 1941. Japan
never declared war on the Soviet Union."<br /><br />7) "The Jew Hitler
(against the advice of all his generals) single-handedly saves Moscow by
ordering army group "Center" to stop its advance on Moscow".<br /><br />8)
"The Jew Hitler tells the Soviets an attack will occur at Kursk. The Jew
Hitler delays the attack for more than four months, until the Soviets
have built defensive lines eight deep. The Soviets concentrate 1,300,000
soldiers with 3,600 tanks, 20,000 artillery pieces, including 6,000
76mm anti-tank guns, and 2,400 aircraft in and around Kursk. An attack
anywhere other than Kursk would be fatal for the Soviets, but the
Soviets seem to know that the attack will come only at Kursk."<br /><br />They knew it because the war was a fake one, planned by the jewish leaders.<br /><br />9) "The Jew Hitler orders German troops to attack the most heavily defended lines ever constructed, at Kursk".<br /><br />"The
Jew Hitler is amazed by the supermen of the elite SS Panzer Korps
Liebstandarte, who, in the south, break through all eight defensive
lines and take on the Soviet reserve tank battalions".<br /><br />"Less than
two weeks into the offensive, worried that the Liebstandarte might win
the battle for the Germans, the Jew Hitler strips this elite group of
their tanks and ships them to Northern Italy, where they sit on their
hands for some months before returning to the eastern front. The pretext
of the Sicily invasion is used".<br /><br />As there was enough jews in the
concentration camps, Hitler's mission was over, and then, he had to
loose the war. And the unexpected success of the SS Panzer Korps
Liebstandarte was not at all a part of the plan. So, he sent them far
away.<br /><br />And, of course, it was not because he was caring for his
troops. In many other occasions, orders were to be killed rather than
retreating.<br /><br />This stupid strategy of being killed rather than
retreating was also a part of the jewish plan. With an elastic defense,
the war could have last two or three more years. But jewish leaders
didn't need the war anymore. So, Hitler had to choose a stupid strategy
which would accelerate the end of the war.<br /><br />10) "The Jew Hitler
refuses total mobilisation of the German people, even though the
munitions factories cried out for manpower and all his enemies had
recruited woman into the work force. The Jew Hitler never bothered to
use half the potential German labor force."<br /><br />11) "And do you think
(the Jew) Roosevelt would have forced the Japanese into the very
destructive Pacific war, if he hadn't been certain Hitler would declare
war on the United States? How was Roosevelt so sure Hitler would declare
war on the United States. What if Hitler had just said, "Piss off,
Roosevelt. Enjoy your little war against Japan." Then Roosevelt would
have ended up just fighting the Japanese without being able to drag the
United States into direct participation in the European war. ..... and
it goes on and on ..... instance, after instance, of Hitler
single-handedly losing the war for the Germans (and winning it for the
Jews)."</div>
<div class="postbody">
</div>
hexzane527http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679132791757266945noreply@blogger.com2